A simulated severe difficult airway does not alter the intubation performance with the SensaScope: a prospective randomised manikin study

被引:6
作者
Ludwig, Andreea A. [2 ]
Baulig, Werner [1 ]
Biro, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Anaesthesiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Zurcher Hohenklin, Dept Internal Med, Davos, Switzerland
关键词
difficult airway; difficult intubation; difficult laryngoscopy; SensaScope equipment; video-assisted intubation; video stylet; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; LARYNGOSCOPE; MANAGEMENT; GLIDESCOPE(R); MCGRATH(R);
D O I
10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283460fc9
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Design Prospective randomised controlled study. Setting Operation unit in a tertiary academic university hospital in a central European city. Period of the study was springtime and summer 2010. Patients or other participants Twenty-four anaesthesiologists with various levels of professional experience were allocated to intubate an airway manikin either with the SensaScope (group S) or with the conventional Macintosh 3 laryngoscope (group L). Interventions Each participant performed three consecutive intubations with normal anatomy followed by three intubations with difficult anatomy. The airway difficulty was simulated by inflation of the manikin's tongue base with 40 ml of air. The times taken to view the larynx and to insert the tracheal tube were noted. The resulting tube position and the occurrence of dental damage were recorded. Main outcome measures Those planned in the protocol. Results In normal anatomy, the laryngeal view (group L 5.9 +/- 4.2 s vs. group S 9.2 +/- 3.5 s) and intubation (group L 13.4 +/- 7.6 s vs. group S 23.3 +/- 8.6 s) was more rapidly obtained with conventional laryngoscopy (values presented as mean +/- SD). In difficult anatomy, only the SensaScope permitted successful laryngeal view (group L impossible vs. group S 9.9 +/- 4.8 s) and tracheal intubation (group L impossible vs. group S 23.4 +/- 8.8 s). The latter always enabled correct tracheal tube position, whereas with laryngoscopy alone either oesophageal intubation or aborted attempts resulted. In the difficult airway setting, the frequency of simulated tooth damage was also significantly higher with conventional laryngoscopy (group L 26 of 36 vs. group S 6 of 36). Conclusions The SensaScope performed fairly well in normal intubation anatomy, although its use was more complex than with conventional laryngoscopy and it required a slightly longer time. In the difficult airway setting, the SensaScope performed as well as in normal anatomy, whereas intubation by direct laryngoscopy proved to be impossible. The SensaScope enables the user to overcome severe airway difficulties caused by large tissue masses at the level of the tongue base or mouth floor. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28:449-453
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 453
页数:5
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] A Comparative Evaluation of 2 Videolaryngoscopes as an Intubation Aid in a Simulated Difficult Airway: A Prospective Randomised Study
    Kumar, Ajay
    Taluja, Anupma
    Saxena, Bhavna
    Dwivedi, Puneet
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2022, 50 (05) : 340 - 345
  • [2] Performance of the glottiscopes: A randomized comparative study on difficult intubation simulation manikin
    Sudrial, J.
    Abdi, W.
    Amathieu, R.
    Luis, D.
    Jabre, P.
    Le Roux, B.
    Slavov, V.
    Kamoun, W.
    Avenel, A.
    Sebbah, J. -L.
    Combes, X.
    Dhonneur, G.
    ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 2010, 29 (05): : 347 - 353
  • [3] Endotracheal Intubation by Paramedics Using Neodymium Magnet and Modified Stylet in Simulated Difficult Airway: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Manikin Study
    Bilge, Sedat
    Tezel, Onur
    Acar, Yahya Ayhan
    Aydin, Guclu
    Aydin, Attila
    Ozkan, Gokhan
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 2019
  • [4] Ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Airway Scope by novice operators in simulated easy and difficult airways - a manikin study
    Tan, B. H.
    Liu, E. H. C.
    Lim, R. T. C.
    Liow, L. M. H.
    Goy, R. W. L.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 64 (02) : 187 - 190
  • [5] The performance of rigid scopes for tracheal intubation: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway
    Kleine-Brueggeney, M.
    Greif, R.
    Urwyler, N.
    Wirthmuller, B.
    Theiler, L.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 (12) : 1456 - 1463
  • [6] Retromolar intubation with video intubating stylet in difficult airway: A randomized crossover manikin study
    Chen, Yen-Yu
    Lin, Jih-Chun
    Tsai, Ming-Jen
    Cheng, Kai-Yuan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 54 : 212 - 220
  • [7] Tracheal intubation for a difficult airway using Airway scope®, KingVision® and McGRATH®: a comparative manikin study of inexperienced personnel
    J Itai
    Y Tanabe
    T Nishida
    T Inagawa
    Y Torikoshi
    Y Kida
    T Tamura
    K Ota
    T Otani
    T Sadamori
    K Une
    R Tsumura
    Y Iwasaki
    N Hirohashi
    K Tanigawal
    Critical Care, 17 (Suppl 2):
  • [8] Performance of intubation with 4 different airway devices by unskilled rescuers: manikin study
    Lee, Dong Woo
    Kang, Mun Ju
    Kim, Yong Hwan
    Lee, Jun Ho
    Cho, Kwang Won
    Kim, Yang Weon
    Cho, Jun Hwi
    Kim, Young Sik
    Hong, Chong Kun
    Hwang, Seong Youn
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 33 (05) : 691 - 696
  • [9] Low skill fibreoptic intubation using i-gel™ and air-Q™ in simulated difficult airways: A randomised study in manikin and in patients
    Sim, Jacqueline Xiu Ling
    Liew, Geoffrey Haw Chieh
    Abdullah, Hairil
    Wong, Theodore Gar Ling
    Wong, Patrick
    PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE, 2020, 29 (03) : 156 - 162
  • [10] Comparison of Bullard and Airtraq laryngoscopes with conventional laryngoscopy in a manikin study of simulated difficult intubation
    Legrand, Maria A. -L.
    Steinmann, Daniel
    Priebe, Hans-Joachim
    Mols, Georg
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 29 (07) : 343 - 350