Evaluating structural safety of trusses using Machine Learning

被引:6
|
作者
Nguyen, Tran-Hieu [1 ]
Vu, Anh-Tuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hanoi Univ Civil Engn, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
Machine Learning; Classification; Adaptive Boosting; Structural Safety; Truss Structure; CRACK DETECTION; DAMAGE DETECTION;
D O I
10.3221/IGF-ESIS.58.23
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this paper, a machine learning-based framework is developed to quickly evaluate the structural safety of trusses. Three numerical examples of a 10-bar truss, a 25-bar truss, and a 47-bar truss are used to illustrate the proposed framework. Firstly, several truss cases with different cross-sectional areas are generated by employing the Latin Hypercube Sampling method. Stresses inside truss members as well as displacements of nodes are determined through finite element analyses and obtained values are compared with design constraints. According to the constraint verification, the safety state is assigned as safe or unsafe. Members' sectional areas and the safety state are stored as the inputs and outputs of the training dataset, respectively. Three popular machine learning classifiers including Support Vector Machine, Deep Neural Network, and Adaptive Boosting are used for evaluating the safety of structures. The comparison is conducted based on two metrics: the accuracy and the area under the ROC curve. For the two first examples, three classifiers get more than 90% of accuracy. For the 47-bar truss, the accuracies of the Support Vector Machine model and the Deep Neural Network model are lower than 70% but the Adaptive Boosting model still retains the high accuracy of approximately 98%. In terms of the area under the ROC curve, the comparative results are similar. Overall, the Adaptive Boosting model outperforms the remaining models. In addition, an investigation is carried out to show the influence of the parameters on the performance of the Adaptive Boosting model.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 318
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The inverse design of structural color using machine learning
    Huang, Zhao
    Liu, Xin
    Zang, Jianfeng
    NANOSCALE, 2019, 11 (45) : 21748 - 21758
  • [22] Evaluating Railroad Ballast Degradation Trends Using Machine Vision and Machine Learning Techniques
    Delay, Benjamin L.
    Moaveni, Maziar
    Hart, John M.
    Sharpe, Phil
    Tutumluer, Erol
    GEOTECHNICAL FRONTIERS 2017: TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES, STRUCTURES, AND SITE INVESTIGATION, 2017, (277): : 432 - 441
  • [23] Assessing safety in horizontal curves using surrogate safety measures and machine learning
    Navid Nadimi
    Hojjat Fathipour
    Abbas Sheykhfard
    Scientific Reports, 15 (1)
  • [24] A Practical Monitoring System for the Structural Safety of Mega-Trusses Using Wireless Vibrating Wire Strain Gauges
    Park, Hyo Seon
    Lee, Hwan Young
    Choi, Se Woon
    Kim, Yousok
    SENSORS, 2013, 13 (12) : 17346 - 17361
  • [25] Evaluating the Perception Index for Cyclists' Safety Using Structural Equation Modelling
    Nair, D. J.
    Saxena, N.
    Dixit, V. V.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2016: PROJECTS AND PRACTICES FOR PROSPERITY, 2016, : 1099 - 1110
  • [26] Industrial Automation with Safety Aspects using Machine Learning Techniques
    Jayasri Kotti
    Safety in Extreme Environments, 2020, 2 (2): : 183 - 188
  • [27] Human Safety Devices using IoT and Machine Learning: A Review
    Sharma, Kritika
    Londhe, Deepali D.
    2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR CONVERGENCE IN TECHNOLOGY (I2CT), 2018,
  • [28] Predicting slope safety using an optimized machine learning model
    Khajehzadeh, Mohammad
    Keawsawasvong, Suraparb
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (12)
  • [29] Accident prevention and safety assistance using IOT and machine learning
    Uma S.
    Eswari R.
    Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments, 2022, 8 (02) : 79 - 103
  • [30] Women Safety Device Designed using IoT and Machine Learning
    Muskan
    Khandelwal, Teena
    Khandelwal, Manisha
    Pandey, Purnendu Shekhar
    2018 IEEE SMARTWORLD, UBIQUITOUS INTELLIGENCE & COMPUTING, ADVANCED & TRUSTED COMPUTING, SCALABLE COMPUTING & COMMUNICATIONS, CLOUD & BIG DATA COMPUTING, INTERNET OF PEOPLE AND SMART CITY INNOVATION (SMARTWORLD/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCOM/IOP/SCI), 2018, : 1204 - 1210