Patient Outreach to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Patients With an Expired Order for Colonoscopy A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:24
|
作者
Cameron, Kenzie A. [1 ,2 ]
Persell, Stephen D. [1 ]
Brown, Tiffany [1 ]
Thompson, Jason [1 ]
Baker, David W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Div Gen Internal Med, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
OCCULT BLOOD-TESTS; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; IMPACT; INTERVENTIONS; STRATEGIES; EDUCATION; ADOPTION; QUALITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1001/archinternmed.2010.468
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Targeted interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening among specific populations could increase screening rates. Patients with an expired order for screening colonoscopy might be persuaded to follow through with screening by such an intervention. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a combined reminder/outreach intervention among patients in a large general internal medicine practice. Participants included 628 patients aged 50 to 79 years with an expired order for screening colonoscopy. Patients were stratified based on receipt of any previous colorectal cancer screening and randomly assigned either to (1) an intervention group that received a mailing containing a reminder letter from their primary care physician, a brochure and digital video disc about colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer screening, and a follow-up telephone call or (2) a usual care control group. The primary outcome was receipt of fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy within 3 months of randomization. Screening outcomes were observed for an additional 3 months (6 months from randomization). Results: Screening rates at 3 months were 9.9% (31 of 314 patients) in the intervention group and 3.2% (10 of 314 patients) in the control group (rate ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-6.2; P=.001). At 6 months, rates were 18.2% (57 of 314 patients) and 12.1% (38 of 314 patients), respectively (rate ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.2; P=.03). Conclusion: Patient outreach to individuals with an expired order for colonoscopy may be an effective tool to modestly increase short-term completion of colorectal cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 646
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Randomized Clinical Trial: A Normocaloric Low-Fiber Diet the Day Before Colonoscopy Is the Most Effective Approach to Bowel Preparation in Colorectal Cancer Screening Colonoscopy
    Alvarez-Gonzalez, Marco A.
    Pantaleon, Miguel A.
    Flores-Le Roux, Juana A.
    Zaffalon, Diana
    Amoros, Jaume
    Bessa, Xavier
    Seoane, Agustin
    Pedro-Botet, Juan
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2019, 62 (04) : 491 - 497
  • [42] Effect of Patient-Directed Messaging on Colorectal Cancer Screening A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Oyalowo, Akinbowale
    Forde, Kimberly A.
    Lamanna, Alicia
    Kochman, Michael L.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (03) : E224529
  • [43] Alerts in electronic medical records to promote a colorectal cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care
    Guiriguet, Carolina
    Munoz-Ortiz, Laura
    Buron, Andrea
    Rivero, Irene
    Grau, Jaume
    Vela-Vallespin, Carmen
    Vilarrubi, Mercedes
    Torres, Miquel
    Hernandez, Cristina
    Mendez-Boo, Leonardo
    Toran, Pere
    Caballeria, Llorenc
    Macia, Francesc
    Castells, Antoni
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2016, 66 (648) : E483 - E490
  • [44] A randomized controlled trial of a tailored navigation intervention to promote breast and cervical cancer screening among intergenerational Southeast Asian women
    Kue, Jennifer
    Tate, Judith
    Szalacha, Laura A.
    Menon, Usha
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 37
  • [45] Adherence to Physician Recommendation to Colorectal Cancer Screening Colonoscopy Among Hispanics
    Jibara, Ghalib
    Jandorf, Lina
    Fodera, Monica B.
    DuHamel, Katherine N.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 26 (10) : 1124 - 1130
  • [46] Increasing breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening among rural women: Baseline characteristics of a randomized control trial
    Biederman, Erika
    Baltic, Ryan
    Katz, Mira L.
    Rawl, Susan
    Vachon, Eric
    Monahan, Patrick O.
    Stump, Timothy E.
    Kettler, Carla
    Carter, Lisa
    Young, Gregory
    Xu, Wendy
    Paskett, Electra D.
    Champion, Victoria
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2022, 123
  • [47] Reinvitation to screening colonoscopy: a randomized-controlled trial of reminding letter and invitation to educational meeting on attendance in nonresponders to initial invitation to screening colonoscopy (REINVITE)
    Pisera, Malgorzata
    Kaminski, Michal F.
    Kraszewska, Ewa
    Rupinski, Maciej
    Regula, Jaroslaw
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 28 (05) : 538 - 542
  • [48] The Effects of the Nurse Navigation Program in Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Temucin, Elif
    Nahcivan, Nursen O.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2020, 35 (01) : 112 - 124
  • [49] Colorectal Cancer Screening Patient Navigation for Patients with Mental Illness and/or Substance Use Disorder: Pilot Randomized Control Trial
    Abuelo, Carolina
    Ashburner, Jeffrey M.
    Atlas, Steven J.
    Knudsen, Amy
    Morrill, James
    Corona, Patricia
    Shtasel, Derri
    Percac-Lima, Sanja
    JOURNAL OF DUAL DIAGNOSIS, 2020, 16 (04) : 438 - 446
  • [50] Effect of a Patient Decision Aid on Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Older Adults A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Dalton, Alexandra F.
    Golin, Carol E.
    Morris, Carolyn
    Kistler, Christine E.
    Dolor, Rowena J.
    Bertin, Kaitlyn B.
    Suresh, Krithika
    Patel, Swati G.
    Lewis, Carmen L.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (12) : e2244982