The Effect of Dose and Quality Assurance in Early Prostate Cancer Treated with Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy

被引:7
|
作者
Henry, A. M. [1 ,2 ]
Rodda, S. L. [1 ]
Mason, M. [1 ]
Musurunu, H. [1 ]
Al-Qaisieh, B. [1 ]
Bownes, P. [1 ]
Smith, J. [1 ]
Franks, K. [1 ]
Carey, B. [1 ]
Bottomley, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] St James Univ Hosp, Leeds Canc Ctr, Leeds LS9 7TF, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Brachytherapy; dosimetry; outcomes; prostate cancer; quality assurance; POSTIMPLANT DOSIMETRY; IMPACT; INTERMEDIATE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.clon.2015.03.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: To examine the relationship between post-implant computed tomography dosimetry and long-term prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival in patients treated with iodine 125 (I-125) low dose rate prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy and, second, to audit recent practice against Royal College of Radiologists' (RCR) guidelines after the re-introduction of post-implant dosimetry for all patients in our centre. Materials and methods: Between March 1995 and September 2007, 2157 consecutive patients with localised prostate cancer underwent I-125 permanent prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy in a single UK centre. All patients were transrectal ultrasound planned delivering a 145 Gy (TG 43) minimum peripheral dose. None received supplemental external beam radiotherapy. Post-implant computed tomography-based dosimetry was undertaken between 4 and 6 weeks after treatment and was available for 711 (33%). Outcomes were analysed in terms of the relationship of D90 to prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival (nadir 2+ definition) and all patients had a minimum follow-up of 5 years. For contemporary patients from 2011, quality metrics from post-implant computed tomography as defined by RCR guidelines are presented. Results: A mean D90 of 138.7 Gy (standard deviation 24.7) was achieved for the historic cohort. Biochemical control at 10 years was 76% in patients with D90 > 140 Gy and 68% in those with D90 < 140 Gy (P < 0.01). In current practice, over the last 3 years the mean (standard deviation) D90 has increased from 154 (15.3) Gy in 2011 to 164 (13.5) Gy in 2013. Similarly, an increase in the mean (standard deviation) V100 from 92 (4.4) to 95 (3.2) % is noted over time. No difference between clinicians was noted. Conclusion: D90 values of less than 140 Gy continue to be predictive of increased risk of recurrence of prostate cancer across risk groups with longer follow-up. Quality assurance can be used to ensure improved and consistent implant quality in a team with multiple clinicians. (C) 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 386
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] High-dose-rate brachytherapy as a monotherapy for prostate cancer-Single-institution results of the extreme fractionation regimen
    Kukielkal, Andrzej Marek
    Dabrowski, Tomasz
    Walasek, Tomasz
    Olchawa, Agnieszka
    Kudzia, Roksana
    Dybek, Dorota
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2015, 14 (03) : 359 - 365
  • [42] High-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: The impact of cellular repair and source decay
    Tien, Christopher J.
    Carlson, David J.
    Nath, Ravinder
    Chen, Zhe
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2019, 18 (05) : 701 - 710
  • [43] Health-Related Quality of Life after Radical Prostatectomy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Wyler, Stephen Frederic
    Engeler, Daniel Stephan
    Seelentag, Wolfhart
    Ries, Gerhard
    Schmid, Hans-Peter
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2009, 82 (01) : 17 - 23
  • [44] Diffusion pattern of low dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer in Japan
    Nakamura, Katsumasa
    Ohga, Saiji
    Yorozu, Atsunori
    Dokiya, Takushi
    Saito, Shiro
    Yamanaka, Hidetoshi
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2013, 104 (07): : 934 - 936
  • [45] Single-Dose Focal Salvage High Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer
    Chitmanee, P.
    Tsang, Y.
    Tharmalingam, H.
    Hamada, M.
    Alonzi, R.
    Ostler, P.
    Hughes, R.
    Lowe, G.
    Hoskin, P.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 32 (04) : 259 - 265
  • [46] A Review of Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy-Techniques and Outcomes
    Marcus, David M.
    Jani, Ashesh B.
    Godette, Karen
    Rossi, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 102 (06) : 500 - 510
  • [47] A Phase 2 Randomized Pilot Study Comparing High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer
    Hathout, Lara
    Mahmoud, Omar
    Wang, Yaqun
    Vergalasova, Irina
    Barkati, Maroie
    Despres, Philippe
    Martin, Andre-Guy
    Foster, William
    Lacroix, Frederic
    Delouya, Guila
    Taussky, Daniel
    Morton, Gerard
    Vigneault, Eric
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 4 (04) : 631 - 640
  • [48] Time-driven activity-based costing of low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy for low-risk prostate cancer
    Ilg, Annette M.
    Laviana, Aaron A.
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    Veruttipong, Darlene
    Steinberg, Michael
    Park, Sang-June
    Burke, Michael A.
    Niedzwiecki, Douglas
    Kupelian, Patrick A.
    Saigal, Christopher
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2016, 15 (06) : 760 - 767
  • [49] Low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate brachytherapy in treatment of prostate cancer - between options
    Skowronek, Janusz
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2013, 5 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [50] Comparison of disease-specific quality of life in prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy: A randomized controlled trial of silodosin versus naftopidil
    Maesaka, Fumisato
    Tanaka, Nobumichi
    Nakai, Yasushi
    Asakawa, Isao
    Tomizawa, Mitsuru
    Owari, Takuya
    Miyake, Makito
    Anai, Satoshi
    Yamaki, Kaori
    Fujii, Tomomi
    Hasegawa, Masatoshi
    Fujimoto, Kiyohide
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 28 (11) : 1171 - 1176