The Effect of Dose and Quality Assurance in Early Prostate Cancer Treated with Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy

被引:7
|
作者
Henry, A. M. [1 ,2 ]
Rodda, S. L. [1 ]
Mason, M. [1 ]
Musurunu, H. [1 ]
Al-Qaisieh, B. [1 ]
Bownes, P. [1 ]
Smith, J. [1 ]
Franks, K. [1 ]
Carey, B. [1 ]
Bottomley, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] St James Univ Hosp, Leeds Canc Ctr, Leeds LS9 7TF, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Brachytherapy; dosimetry; outcomes; prostate cancer; quality assurance; POSTIMPLANT DOSIMETRY; IMPACT; INTERMEDIATE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.clon.2015.03.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: To examine the relationship between post-implant computed tomography dosimetry and long-term prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival in patients treated with iodine 125 (I-125) low dose rate prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy and, second, to audit recent practice against Royal College of Radiologists' (RCR) guidelines after the re-introduction of post-implant dosimetry for all patients in our centre. Materials and methods: Between March 1995 and September 2007, 2157 consecutive patients with localised prostate cancer underwent I-125 permanent prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy in a single UK centre. All patients were transrectal ultrasound planned delivering a 145 Gy (TG 43) minimum peripheral dose. None received supplemental external beam radiotherapy. Post-implant computed tomography-based dosimetry was undertaken between 4 and 6 weeks after treatment and was available for 711 (33%). Outcomes were analysed in terms of the relationship of D90 to prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival (nadir 2+ definition) and all patients had a minimum follow-up of 5 years. For contemporary patients from 2011, quality metrics from post-implant computed tomography as defined by RCR guidelines are presented. Results: A mean D90 of 138.7 Gy (standard deviation 24.7) was achieved for the historic cohort. Biochemical control at 10 years was 76% in patients with D90 > 140 Gy and 68% in those with D90 < 140 Gy (P < 0.01). In current practice, over the last 3 years the mean (standard deviation) D90 has increased from 154 (15.3) Gy in 2011 to 164 (13.5) Gy in 2013. Similarly, an increase in the mean (standard deviation) V100 from 92 (4.4) to 95 (3.2) % is noted over time. No difference between clinicians was noted. Conclusion: D90 values of less than 140 Gy continue to be predictive of increased risk of recurrence of prostate cancer across risk groups with longer follow-up. Quality assurance can be used to ensure improved and consistent implant quality in a team with multiple clinicians. (C) 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 386
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Use of Implant Volume for Quality Assurance of Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy Treatment Plans
    Wilkinson, D.
    Kolar, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 353 - 353
  • [22] Focal application of low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a pilot study
    Mandavi, S. Sara
    Spodinger, Ingrid T.
    Salcudean, Septimiu E.
    Kozlowski, Piotr
    Chang, Silvia D.
    Ng, Tony
    Lobo, Julio
    Nir, Guy
    Moradi, Hand
    Peacock, Michael
    Morris, W. James
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2017, 9 (03) : 197 - 208
  • [23] High-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Masui, Koji
    Suzuki, Gen
    Nakamura, Satoaki
    Yamada, Kei
    Okihara, Koji
    Shiraishi, Takumi
    Yoshida, Ken
    Kotsuma, Tadayuki
    Tanaka, Eiichi
    Otani, Keisuke
    Yoshioka, Yasuo
    Ogawa, Kazuhiko
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 132 : 162 - 170
  • [24] Early quality of life outcomes in patients with prostate cancer managed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy
    Komiya, Akira
    Fujiuchi, Yasuyoshi
    Ito, Takatoshi
    Morii, Akihiro
    Yasuda, Kenji
    Watanabe, Akihiko
    Nozaki, Tetsuo
    Iida, Hiroaki
    Nomura, Kuninori
    Fuse, Hideki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 20 (02) : 185 - 192
  • [25] Effectiveness, toxicity and impact on quality of life of high-dose-rate brachytherapy delivered in two fractions as monotherapy in patients with prostate cancer
    Olsen, Johan Staby
    Valachis, Antonis
    Johansson, Bengt
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2025, 51
  • [26] Hemi-ablative low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy for unilateral localised prostate cancer
    Langley, Stephen
    Uribe, Jennifer
    Uribe-Lewis, Santiago
    Franklin, Adrian
    Perna, Carla
    Horton, Alex
    Cunningham, Melanie
    Higgins, Donna
    Deering, Claire
    Khaksar, Sara
    Laing, Robert
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 125 (03) : 383 - 390
  • [27] Nationwide, Multicenter, Retrospective Study on High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Prostate Cancer
    Yoshioka, Yasuo
    Kotsuma, Tadayuki
    Komiya, Akira
    Kariya, Shinji
    Konishi, Koji
    Nonomura, Norio
    Ogawa, Kazuhiko
    Tanaka, Eiichi
    Nishimura, Kensaku
    Fujiuchi, Yasuyoshi
    Kitamura, Hiroshi
    Yamagami, Takuji
    Yamasaki, Ichiro
    Nishimura, Kazuo
    Teshima, Teruki
    Nakamura, Katsumasa
    Itami, Jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 97 (05): : 952 - 961
  • [28] High-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year results
    Solodkiy, V. A.
    Pavlov, A. Yu
    Tsybulskii, A. D.
    Dzidzaria, A. G.
    Sorokin, A. S.
    Mirzakhanov, R., I
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2022, 18 (01): : 58 - 69
  • [29] Counterpoint: There is a dose-response relationship in the low-dose rate brachytherapy management of prostate cancer
    Stock, Richard G.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2010, 9 (04) : 293 - 296
  • [30] Modelling second malignancy risks from low dose rate and high dose rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for localised prostate cancer
    Murray, Louise
    Mason, Joshua
    Henry, Ann M.
    Hoskin, Peter
    Siebert, Frank-Andre
    Venselaar, Jack
    Bownes, Peter
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 120 (02) : 293 - 299