Using Videoconferencing Focus Groups in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research With Chinese Im/Migrants in Australia

被引:3
作者
Wong, Horas T. H. [1 ]
Jin, Defeng [2 ]
Wang, Pan [3 ]
Sun, Yingli [3 ]
Mao, Limin [2 ]
Zhang, Ye
Ogilvie, Erin [4 ]
Vujcich, Daniel [6 ]
Newman, Christy [2 ,5 ]
O'Connor, Catherine C. [1 ]
Vaughan, Cathy [7 ]
Carter, Allison [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales Sydney, Kirby Inst, Level 6,Wallace Wurth Bldg,High St, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales Sydney, Ctr Social Res Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales Sydney, Sch Humanities & Languages, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales Sydney, Kirby Inst, HIV Epidemiol & Prevent Program, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ New South Wales Sydney, UNSW Arts Design & Architecture, Engagement & Impact, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Curtin Univ, Perth, WA, Australia
[7] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Ctr Hlth Equ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Simon Fraser Univ, Burnaby, BC, Canada
关键词
online; research; qualitative methods; research design; focus groups; research strategies; qualitative Australia; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; CANCER SURVIVORS; ONLINE; WEB; GAY; TECHNOLOGY; EXPERIENCE; INTERNET; SAMPLE;
D O I
10.1177/10497323211043823
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Videoconferencing focus groups have emerged as a popular method for collecting qualitative data. However, its use in sexual and reproductive health research is still very much in its infancy. Based on participants' feedback and researchers' reflections on using videoconferencing focus groups to collect sexual and reproductive health data with 39 heterosexual and non-heterosexual Chinese im/migrants in Australia, we discuss some of the key lessons learned, and considerations involved in shifting from face-to-face to online focus groups. Overall, videoconferencing focus groups appeared to be a highly feasible and acceptable way to discuss "sensitive" topics with Chinese im/migrants. Importantly, researchers need to be both creative and reflexive during the research process and must not forget that the success of a study lies not only in troubleshooting technical issues but also in cultivating and maintaining a trusting relationship with research participants.
引用
收藏
页码:2757 / 2769
页数:13
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [51] Focus group method and methodology: current practice and recent debate
    Parker, Andrew
    Tritter, Jonathan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH & METHOD IN EDUCATION, 2006, 29 (01) : 23 - 37
  • [52] Seeking Ways to Inform the Uninformed: Improving the Informed Consent Process in Online Social Science Research
    Perrault, Evan K.
    Keating, David M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2018, 13 (01) : 50 - 60
  • [53] Informed Consent-Uninformed Participants: Shortcomings of Online Social Science Consent Forms and Recommendations for Improvement
    Perrault, Evan K.
    Nazione, Samantha A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2016, 11 (03) : 274 - 280
  • [54] Poland B., 1998, QUAL INQ, V4, P293, DOI DOI 10.1177/107780049800400209
  • [55] Powers J.D., 2017, INFLUENCE PARENTAL C
  • [56] Reaching Adolescent Gay, Bisexual, and Queer Men Online: Development and Refinement of a National Recruitment Strategy
    Prescott, Tonya L.
    Phillips, Gregory, II
    DuBois, L. Zachary
    Bull, Sheana S.
    Mustanski, Brian
    Ybarra, Michele L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (08)
  • [57] Sensitive Health Topics With Underserved Patient Populations: Methodological Considerations for Online Focus Group Discussions
    Reisner, Sari L.
    Randazzo, Renee K.
    Hughto, Jaclyn M. White
    Peitzmeier, Sarah
    DuBois, L. Zachary
    Pardee, Dana J.
    Marrow, Elliot
    McLean, Sarah
    Potter, Jennifer
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2018, 28 (10) : 1658 - 1673
  • [58] Richard B, 2018, INT J CONTEMP HOSP M, V30, P3175, DOI [10.1108/IJCHM-11-2017-0715, 10.1108/ijchm-11-2017-0715]
  • [59] Design and methods of the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships
    Richters, Juliet
    Badcock, Paul B.
    Simpson, Judy M.
    Shellard, David
    Rissel, Chris
    de Visser, Richard O.
    Grulich, Andrew E.
    Smith, Anthony M. A.
    [J]. SEXUAL HEALTH, 2014, 11 (05) : 383 - 396
  • [60] Virtual Versus In-Person Focus Groups: Comparison of Costs, Recruitment, and Participant Logistics
    Rupert, Douglas J.
    Poehlman, Jon A.
    Hayes, Jennifer J.
    Ray, Sarah E.
    Moultrie, Rebecca R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (03)