Information Content Weighting for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment

被引:980
|
作者
Wang, Zhou [1 ]
Li, Qiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Media Excel Inc, Austin, TX 78759 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Gaussian scale mixture (GSM); image quality assessment (IQA); pooling; information content measure; peak signal-to-noise-ratio (PSNR); structural similarity (SSIM); statistical image modeling; SCALE MIXTURES; ATTENTION; STATISTICS; STRATEGIES; VISIBILITY; GAUSSIANS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/TIP.2010.2092435
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Many state-of-the-art perceptual image quality assessment (IQA) algorithms share a common two-stage structure: local quality/distortion measurement followed by pooling. While significant progress has been made in measuring local image quality/distortion, the pooling stage is often done in ad-hoc ways, lacking theoretical principles and reliable computational models. This paper aims to test the hypothesis that when viewing natural images, the optimal perceptual weights for pooling should be proportional to local information content, which can be estimated in units of bit using advanced statistical models of natural images. Our extensive studies based upon six publicly-available subject-rated image databases concluded with three useful findings. First, information content weighting leads to consistent improvement in the performance of IQA algorithms. Second, surprisingly, with information content weighting, even the widely criticized peak signal-to-noise-ratio can be converted to a competitive perceptual quality measure when compared with state-of-the-art algorithms. Third, the best overall performance is achieved by combining information content weighting with multiscale structural similarity measures.
引用
收藏
页码:1185 / 1198
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spread Spectrum Image Watermarking Based on Perceptual Quality Metric
    Zhang, Fan
    Liu, Wenyu
    Lin, Weisi
    Ngan, King Ngi
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2011, 20 (11) : 3207 - 3218
  • [42] Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similarity
    Ding, Keyan
    Ma, Kede
    Wang, Shiqi
    Simoncelli, Eero P.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 44 (05) : 2567 - 2581
  • [43] Blind image quality assessment by simulating the visual cortex
    Cai, Rongtai
    Fang, Ming
    VISUAL COMPUTER, 2023, 39 (10) : 4639 - 4656
  • [44] Fractal Analysis for Reduced Reference Image Quality Assessment
    Xu, Yong
    Liu, Delei
    Quan, Yuhui
    Le Callet, Patrick
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2015, 24 (07) : 2098 - 2109
  • [45] PERCEPTUAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF HIGH FRAME RATE VIDEO
    Nasiri, Rasoul Mohammadi
    Wang, Jiheng
    Rehman, Abdul
    Wang, Shiqi
    Wang, Zhou
    2015 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MULTIMEDIA SIGNAL PROCESSING (MMSP), 2015,
  • [46] Video Quality Assessment Based on Measuring Perceptual Noise from Spatial and Temporal Perspectives
    Zhao, Yin
    Yu, Lu
    Chen, Zhenzhong
    Zhu, Ce
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 21 (12) : 1890 - 1902
  • [47] TRANSFORMER FOR IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT
    You, Junyong
    Korhonen, Jari
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2021, : 1389 - 1393
  • [48] Dual-Anchor Metric Learning for Blind Image Quality Assessment of Screen Content Images
    Jing, Weiyi
    Bai, Yongqiang
    Zhu, Zhongjie
    Zhang, Rong
    Jin, Yiwen
    ELECTRONICS, 2022, 11 (16)
  • [49] Retinal image quality assessment using generic image quality indicators
    Pires Dias, Joao Miguel
    Oliveira, Carlos Manta
    da Silva Cruz, Luis A.
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2014, 19 : 73 - 90
  • [50] Full-reference Screen Content Image Quality Assessment by Fusing Multilevel Structure Similarity
    Chen, Chenglizhao
    Zhao, Hongmeng
    Yang, Huan
    Yu, Teng
    Peng, Chong
    Qin, Hong
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA COMPUTING COMMUNICATIONS AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 17 (03)