Global processing provides malignancy evidence complementary to the information captured by humans or machines following detailed mammogram inspection

被引:11
作者
Gandomkar, Ziba [1 ]
Siviengphanom, Somphone [1 ]
Ekpo, Ernest U. [1 ]
Suleiman, Mo'ayyad [1 ]
Li, Tong [1 ]
Xu, Dong [2 ]
Evans, Karla K. [3 ]
Lewis, Sarah J. [1 ]
Wolfe, Jeremy M. [4 ,5 ]
Brennan, Patrick C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Discipline Med Imaging Sci, 512 Block M,Cumberland Campus, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Engn, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ York, Dept Psychol, York, N Yorkshire, England
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-021-99582-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The information captured by the gist signal, which refers to radiologists' first impression arising from an initial global image processing, is poorly understood. We examined whether the gist signal can provide complementary information to data captured by radiologists (experiment 1), or computer algorithms (experiment 2) based on detailed mammogram inspection. In the first experiment, 19 radiologists assessed a case set twice, once based on a half-second image presentation (i.e., gist signal) and once in the usual viewing condition. Their performances in two viewing conditions were compared using repeated measure correlation (rm-corr). The cancer cases (19 cases x 19 readers) exhibited non-significant trend with rm-corr = 0.012 (p = 0.82, CI: -0.09, 0.12). For normal cases (41 cases x 19 readers), a weak correlation of rm-corr = 0.238 (p < 0.001, CI: 0.17, 0.30) was found. In the second experiment, we combined the abnormality score from a state-of-the-art deep learning-based tool (DL) with the radiological gist signal using a support vector machine (SVM). To obtain the gist signal, 53 radiologists assessed images based on half-second image presentation. The SVM performance for each radiologist and an average reader, whose gist responses were the mean abnormality scores given by all 53 readers to each image was assessed using leave-one-out cross-validation. For the average reader, the AUC for gist, DL, and the SVM, were 0.76 (CI: 0.62-0.86), 0.79 (CI: 0.63-0.89), and 0.88 (CI: 0.79-0.94). For all readers with a gist AUC significantly better than chance-level, the SVM outperformed DL. The gist signal provided malignancy evidence with no or weak associations with the information captured by humans in normal radiologic reporting, which involves detailed mammogram inspection. Adding gist signal to a state-of-the-art deep learning-based tool improved its performance for the breast cancer detection.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] The Patient Burden of Screening Mammography Recall
    Alcusky, Matthew
    Philpotts, Liane
    Bonafede, Machaon
    Clarke, Janice
    Skoufalos, Alexandria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 23 : S11 - S19
  • [2] [Anonymous], ICLR WORKSH TRACK
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, P 25 INT C NEUR INF, DOI DOI 10.5555/2999325.2999464
  • [4] Australia B., 2002, NATL ACCREDITATION S
  • [5] Repeated Measures Correlation
    Bakdash, Jonathan Z.
    Marusich, Laura R.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [6] Brennan P., 2017, INT J RADIOL RAD THE, V4
  • [7] Brennan P., MED IMAGING 2013 IMA
  • [8] Radiologists can detect the 'gist' of breast cancer before any overt signs of cancer appear
    Brennan, Patrick C.
    Gandomkar, Ziba
    Ekpo, Ernest U.
    Tapia, Kriscia
    Trieu, Phuong D.
    Lewis, Sarah J.
    Wolfe, Jeremy M.
    Evans, Karla K.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [9] Chin M, 2018, J VISUAL-JAPAN, V18, P391
  • [10] A half-second glimpse often lets radiologists identify breast cancer cases even when viewing the mammogram of the opposite breast
    Evans, Karla K.
    Haygood, Tamara Miner
    Cooper, Julie
    Culpan, Anne-Marie
    Wolfe, Jeremy M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (37) : 10292 - 10297