Genetic diversity of Pyrenophora teres in Algeria

被引:5
作者
Ahmed Lhadj, Wassila [1 ]
Boungab, Karima [1 ]
Righi Assia, Fatiha [1 ]
Celik Oguz, Arzu [2 ]
Karakaya, Aziz [2 ]
Olmez, Fatih [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mustapha Stambouli, Dept Agron Sci, Fac Nat & Life Sci, Lab Res Biol Syst & Geomat, Mascara, Algeria
[2] Ankara Univ, Dept Plant Protect, Fac Agr, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Sivas Sci & Technol Univ, Dept Plant Protect, Fac Agr Sci & Technol, Sivas, Turkey
关键词
Barley; Pyrenophora teres; Drechslera teres; Net blotch; Mating type; Genetic diversity; Algeria; POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION; MATING-TYPE IDIOMORPHS; NET BLOTCH; F-MACULATA; SPOT FORM; BARLEY; POPULATIONS; PATHOGENS; MARKERS; AGENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s42161-021-01010-0
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Barley net blotch is one of the most widespread and destructive foliar diseases of barley crops worldwide. The causal fungal agent, Pyrenophora teres (anamorphic stage: Drechslera teres) occurs in two forms, P. teres f. maculata (Ptm) and P. teres f. teres (Ptt) exhibiting the spot and net type symptoms, respectively. In this study, sixty-one P. teres single conidia isolates were obtained from different cereal-growing areas in Algeria. Fungal isolates of net and spot forms were identified using appropriate form-specific SNP primers. The results indicated that 57.38% of the isolates were Ptm, while 42.62% were identified as Ptt. Mating-type assessments of P. teres isolates were conducted using MAT-specific single nucleotide polymorphism primers. Among the tested strains of Ptt, 19 were found as MAT1-2 and only 7 were determined as MAT 1-1; while 27 were identified as MAT 1-1, and 8 were found as MAT1-2 for the Ptm population. Inter-simple sequence repeat markers (ISSR) were used to examine genetic variation and relationships within the P. teres population. The similarity rates were found as 0.60 and 0.63 within Ptt and Ptm populations, respectively. Our results suggested that both populations are reproducing sexually. It appears that P. teres f. teres population is reproducing exclusively sexually and P. teres f. maculata population is reproducing mostly sexually, but asexual reproduction is also occurring. Obviously, ascospore production is a key epidemiological aspect, but in the case of P. teres f. maculata, conidia may also be playing a role.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 315
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Akar T., 2004, Barley: Post-harvest operations
  • [2] Prevalence of mating type idiomorphs in Pyrenophora teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata populations from the Canadian prairies
    Akhavan, Alireza
    Turkington, T. Kelly
    Kebede, Berisso
    Tekauz, Andy
    Kutcher, H. Randy
    Kirkham, Colleen
    Xi, Kequan
    Kumar, Krishan
    Tucker, James R.
    Strelkov, Stephen E.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2015, 37 (01) : 52 - 60
  • [3] A modified protocol for rapid DNA isolation from plant tissues using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide
    Allen, G. C.
    Flores-Vergara, M. A.
    Krasnyanski, S.
    Kumar, S.
    Thompson, W. F.
    [J]. NATURE PROTOCOLS, 2006, 1 (05) : 2320 - 2325
  • [4] Genetic Relationship of Pyrenophora graminea, P-teres f. maculata and P-teres f. teres assessed by RAPD analysis
    Bakonyi, J.
    Justesen, A. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2007, 155 (02) : 76 - 83
  • [5] Baturo-Ciesniewska A, 2012, J PLANT PATHOL, V94, P339
  • [6] Boungab K, 2012, PHYTOPATHOL MEDITERR, V51, P577
  • [7] Evidence of recombination between net- and spot-type populations of Pyrenophora teres as determined by RAPD analysis
    Campbell, GF
    Lucas, JA
    Crous, PW
    [J]. MYCOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2002, 106 : 602 - 608
  • [8] Mating type idiomorphs of Pyrenophora teres in Turkey
    Celik Oguz, Arzu
    Olmez, Fatih
    Karakaya, Aziz
    [J]. ZEMDIRBYSTE-AGRICULTURE, 2018, 105 (03) : 271 - 278
  • [9] Genetic variation of Pyrenophora teres f. teres isolates in Western Australia and emergence of a Cyp51A fungicide resistance mutation
    Ellwood, S. R.
    Piscetek, V.
    Mair, W. J.
    Lawrence, J. A.
    Lopez-Ruiz, F. J.
    Rawlinson, C.
    [J]. PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2019, 68 (01) : 135 - 142
  • [10] Ficsor A, 2014, J PLANT PATHOL, V96, P515