Application of unmanned aerial systems for high throughput phenotyping of large wheat breeding nurseries

被引:154
作者
Haghighattalab, Atena [1 ]
Gonzalez Perez, Lorena [2 ]
Mondal, Suchismita [2 ]
Singh, Daljit [3 ]
Schinstock, Dale [4 ]
Rutkoski, Jessica [2 ,5 ]
Ortiz-Monasterio, Ivan [2 ]
Prakash Singh, Ravi [2 ]
Goodin, Douglas [1 ]
Poland, Jesse [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Geog, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr CIMMYT, Int Apdo,Postal 6-641, Mexico City 06600, DF, Mexico
[3] Kansas State Univ, Interdept Genet Program, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[4] Kansas State Univ, Dept Mech & Nucl Engn, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Coll Agr & Life Sci, Int Programs, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[6] Kansas State Univ, Dept Plant Pathol, Wheat Genet Resource Ctr, Throckmorton Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[7] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agron, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Unmanned aerial vehicles/systems (UAV/UAS); Wheat; High-throughput phenotyping; Remote sensing; GNDVI; Plot extraction; EMPIRICAL LINE METHOD; REMOTE; HERITABILITY; REFLECTANCE; CALIBRATION; PHENOMICS; AIRCRAFT; BIOMASS; IMAGERY;
D O I
10.1186/s13007-016-0134-6
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Low cost unmanned aerial systems (UAS) have great potential for rapid proximal measurements of plants in agriculture. In the context of plant breeding and genetics, current approaches for phenotyping a large number of breeding lines under field conditions require substantial investments in time, cost, and labor. For field-based high-throughput phenotyping (HTP), UAS platforms can provide high-resolution measurements for small plot research, while enabling the rapid assessment of tens-of-thousands of field plots. The objective of this study was to complete a baseline assessment of the utility of UAS in assessment field trials as commonly implemented in wheat breeding programs. We developed a semi-automated image-processing pipeline to extract plot level data from UAS imagery. The image dataset was processed using a photogrammetric pipeline based on image orientation and radiometric calibration to produce orthomosaic images. We also examined the relationships between vegetation indices (VIs) extracted from high spatial resolution multispectral imagery collected with two different UAS systems (eBee Ag carrying MultiSpec 4C camera, and IRIS+ quadcopter carrying modified NIR Canon S100) and ground truth spectral data from hand-held spectroradiometer. Results: We found good correlation between the VIs obtained from UAS platforms and ground-truth measurements and observed high broad-sense heritability for VIs. We determined radiometric calibration methods developed for satellite imagery significantly improved the precision of VIs from the UAS. We observed VIs extracted from calibrated images of Canon S100 had a significantly higher correlation to the spectroradiometer (r = 0.76) than VIs from the MultiSpec 4C camera (r = 0.64). Their correlation to spectroradiometer readings was as high as or higher than repeated measurements with the spectroradiometer per se. Conclusion: The approaches described here for UAS imaging and extraction of proximal sensing data enable collection of HTP measurements on the scale and with the precision needed for powerful selection tools in plant breeding. Low-cost UAS platforms have great potential for use as a selection tool in plant breeding programs. In the scope of tools development, the pipeline developed in this study can be effectively employed for other UAS and also other crops planted in breeding nurseries.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Agisoft LLC, 2016, AG PHOTOSCAN US MAN
  • [2] Development and evaluation of a field-based high-throughput phenotyping platform
    Andrade-Sanchez, Pedro
    Gore, Michael A.
    Heun, John T.
    Thorp, Kelly R.
    Carmo-Silva, A. Elizabete
    French, Andrew N.
    Salvucci, Michael E.
    White, Jeffrey W.
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY, 2014, 41 (01) : 68 - 79
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2003, Estimating and Interpreting Heritability for Plant Breeding: An Update, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470650202.CH2
  • [4] Assessment of vineyard water status variability by thermal and multispectral imagery using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)
    Baluja, Javier
    Diago, Maria P.
    Balda, Pedro
    Zorer, Roberto
    Meggio, Franco
    Morales, Fermin
    Tardaguila, Javier
    [J]. IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 2012, 30 (06) : 511 - 522
  • [5] High-throughput shoot imaging to study drought responses
    Berger, Bettina
    Parent, Boris
    Tester, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2010, 61 (13) : 3519 - 3528
  • [6] BreedVision - A Multi-Sensor Platform for Non-Destructive Field-Based Phenotyping in Plant Breeding
    Busemeyer, Lucas
    Mentrup, Daniel
    Moeller, Kim
    Wunder, Erik
    Alheit, Katharina
    Hahn, Volker
    Maurer, Hans Peter
    Reif, Jochen C.
    Wuerschum, Tobias
    Mueller, Joachim
    Rahe, Florian
    Ruckelshausen, Arno
    [J]. SENSORS, 2013, 13 (03) : 2830 - 2847
  • [7] Chao HY, 2010, INT J CONTROL AUTOM, V8, P36, DOI [10.1007/S12555-010-0105-z, 10.1007/s12555-010-0105-z]
  • [8] Pheno-Copter: A Low-Altitude, Autonomous Remote-Sensing Robotic Helicopter for High-Throughput Field-Based Phenotyping
    Chapman, Scott C.
    Merz, Torsten
    Chan, Amy
    Jackway, Paul
    Hrabar, Stefan
    Dreccer, M. Fernanda
    Holland, Edward
    Zheng, Bangyou
    Ling, T. Jun
    Jimenez-Berni, Jose
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2014, 4 (02): : 279 - 301
  • [9] Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement
    Cobb, Joshua N.
    DeClerck, Genevieve
    Greenberg, Anthony
    Clark, Randy
    McCouch, Susan
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2013, 126 (04) : 867 - 887
  • [10] Development and Deployment of a Portable Field Phenotyping Platform
    Crain, Jared L.
    Wei, Yong
    Barker, Jared, III
    Thompson, Sean M.
    Alderman, Phillip D.
    Reynolds, Matthew
    Zhang, Naiqian
    Poland, Jesse
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (03) : 965 - 975