Platform for automatic patient quality assurance via Monte Carlo simulations in proton therapy

被引:27
作者
Marmitt, G. Guterres [1 ]
Pin, A. [2 ]
Siang, K. Ng Wei [1 ]
Janssens, G. [2 ]
Souris, K. [3 ]
Cohilis, M. [3 ]
Langendijk, J. A. [1 ]
Both, S. [1 ]
Knopf, A. [1 ]
Meijers, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Ion Beam Applicat, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium
[3] Catholic Univ Louvain, Inst Rech Expt & Clin, Ottignies, Belgium
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2020年 / 70卷
关键词
Patient QA; Scanned proton therapy; Independent dose calculation; Treatment log files; DOSE CALCULATION; VERIFICATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.12.018
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
For radiation therapy, it is crucial to ensure that the delivered dose matches the planned dose. Errors in the dose calculations done in the treatment planning system (TPS), treatment delivery errors, other software bugs or data corruption during transfer might lead to significant differences between predicted and delivered doses. As such, patient specific quality assurance (QA) of dose distributions, through experimental validation of individual fields, is necessary. These measurement based approaches, however, are performed with 2D detectors, with limited resolution and in a water phantom. Moreover, they are work intensive and often impose a bottleneck to treatment efficiency. In this work, we investigated the potential to replace measurement-based approach with a simulation-based patient specific QA using a Monte Carlo (MC) code as independent dose calculation engine in combination with treatment log files. Our developed QA platform is composed of a web interface, servers and computation scripts, and is capable to autonomously launch simulations, identify and report dosimetric inconsistencies. To validate the beam model of independent MC engine, in-water simulations of mono-energetic layers and 30 SOBP-type dose distributions were performed. Average Gamma passing ratio 99 +/- 0.5% for criteria 2%/2 mm was observed. To demonstrate feasibility of the proposed approach, 10 clinical cases such as head and neck, intracranial indications and craniospinal axis, were retrospectively evaluated via the QA platform. The results obtained via QA platform were compared to QA results obtained by measurement-based approach. This comparison demonstrated consistency between the methods, while the proposed approach significantly reduced in-room time required for QA procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 57
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Verification of patient-specific dose distributions in proton therapy using a commercial two-dimensional ion chamber array
    Arjomandy, Bijan
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Ciangaru, George
    Zhu, Ronald
    Song, Xiaofei
    Gillin, Michael
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (11) : 5831 - 5837
  • [2] Correction of CT artifacts and its influence on Monte Carlo dose calculations
    Bazalova, Magdalena
    Beaulieu, Luc
    Palefsky, Steven
    Verhaegen, Frank
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2119 - 2132
  • [3] contributors G, 2018, ANGULAR FULL STACK G
  • [4] Effect of statistical fluctuation in Monte Carlo based photon beam dose calculation on gamma index evaluation
    Graves, Yan Jiang
    Jia, Xun
    Jiang, Steve B.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (06) : 1839 - 1853
  • [5] Hammond S, 2009, NODE JS V10 11 0
  • [6] A motorized solid-state phantom for patient-specific dose verification in ion beam radiotherapy
    Henkner, K.
    Winter, M.
    Echner, G.
    Ackermann, B.
    Brons, S.
    Horn, J.
    Jaekel, O.
    Karger, C. P.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (18) : 7151 - 7163
  • [7] Ittycheria D, 2009, MONGODB V4 0 2
  • [8] Jodogne S., 2012, ORTHANC V1 4 2
  • [9] In vivo proton range verification: a review
    Knopf, Antje-Christin
    Lomax, Antony
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (15) : 131 - 160
  • [10] Use of treatment log files in spot scanning proton therapy as part of patient-specific quality assurance
    Li, Heng
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Poenisch, Falk
    Suzuki, Kazumichi
    Li, Yupeng
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Lee, Andrew K.
    Gillin, Michael T.
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (02)