Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization

被引:960
作者
Koss, Mary P.
Abbey, Antonia
Campbell, Rebecca
Cook, Sarah
Norris, Jeanette
Testa, Maria
Ullman, Sarah
West, Carolyn
White, Jacquelyn
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ Hlth, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Georgia State Univ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] SUNY Coll Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14222 USA
[7] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
[8] Univ Washington, Tacoma, WA USA
[9] Univ N Carolina, Greensboro, NC 27412 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Sexual Experiences Survey (SES) assesses victimization and perpetration of unwanted sexual experiences (e.g., Koss, Gidycz, & Wisniewski, 1987). Revised versions of the SES that resulted from the work of the SES Collaboration are now available. This article reviews weaknesses of the SES that were identified, strengths that were preserved, and methodological considerations in the measurement of unwanted sexual experiences that informed the revisions. The primary changes include: more behavioral specificity; conversion to gender neutrality; full crossing of unwanted acts and coercive tactics; and revised and updated wording for assessing consent, alcohol-related incidents, unwanted acts, and coercive tactics. For illustration, the full text of the revised victimization version and its scoring rules are provided. The article concludes with suggestions for future research. These suggestions aim to involve researchers in a coordinated agenda to develop data that clarify methodological questions and contribute to continued improvement in assessing sexual victimization and perpetration.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 370
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
[11]   Feminist approaches to social science: Epistemological and methodological tenets [J].
Campbell, R ;
Wasco, SM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 28 (06) :773-791
[12]   Sexual victimization among African American adolescent females - Examination of the reliability and validity of the Sexual Experiences Survey [J].
Cecil, H ;
Matson, SC .
JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2006, 21 (01) :89-104
[13]   Self-reports of sexual, physical, and nonphysical abuse perpetration - A comparison of three measures [J].
Cook, SL .
VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, 2002, 8 (05) :541-565
[14]  
CRAWFORD MC, 1999, PSYCHOL WOMEN Q, V23
[15]   On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures [J].
Edwards, JR ;
Bagozzi, RP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2000, 5 (02) :155-174
[16]  
FIELDS B, 2006, WOMEN STRESSFUL LIFE
[17]   The discovery of acquaintance rape - The salience of methodological innovation and rigor [J].
Fisher, BS ;
Cullen, FT ;
Daigle, LE .
JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2005, 20 (04) :493-500
[18]  
Fisher BS., 2000, CRIMINAL JUSTICE 200, V4, P317
[19]   Perceived control and distress following sexual assault: A longitudinal test of a new model [J].
Frazier, PA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 84 (06) :1257-1269
[20]   Effects of context and question type on endorsement of childhood sexual abuse [J].
Fricker, AE ;
Smith, DW ;
Davis, JL ;
Hanson, RF .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 2003, 16 (03) :265-268