Gastrointestinal endoscope contamination rates - elevators are not only to blame: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:10
作者
Goyal, Hemant [1 ,2 ]
Larsen, Sara [3 ]
Perisetti, Abhilash [4 ]
Larsen, Nikolaj Birk [5 ]
Ockert, Lotte Klinten [1 ]
Adamsen, Sven [1 ,6 ]
Tharian, Benjamin [7 ]
Thosani, Nirav [8 ]
机构
[1] UTHealth iGUT, McGovern Med Sch, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Ctr Intervent Gastroenterol, Houston, TX USA
[2] Mercer Univ, Sch Med, Macon, GA 31207 USA
[3] Ambu AS, Ballerup, Denmark
[4] Parkview Canc Inst, Div Intervent Oncol & Surg Endoscopy IOSE, Wayne, IN USA
[5] Aalborg Univ, Fac Med, Aalborg, Denmark
[6] Univ Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hosp, Ctr Digest Dis, Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Gen & Adv Endoscopy, Med, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[8] UTHealth, McGovern Med Sch, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Ctr Intervent Gastroenterol,UTHealth iGUT, Houston, TX USA
关键词
HIGH-LEVEL DISINFECTION; MICROBIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE; FLEXIBLE BRONCHOSCOPES; DUODENOSCOPE; TRANSMISSION; INFECTION; CULTURE; RISK; QUARANTINE; GUIDELINE;
D O I
10.1055/a-1795-8883
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims Duodenoscopes that are contaminated due to inadequate reprocessing are well-documented. However, studies have demonstrated poor reprocessing of other kinds of endoscopes as well, including echoendoscopes, gastroscopes, and colonoscopes. We estimated the contamination rate beyond the elevator of gastrointestinal endoscopes based on available data. Methods We searched PubMed and Embase from January 1, 2010 to October 10, 2020, for studies investigating contamination rates of reprocessed gastrointestinal endoscopes. A random-effects model was used to calculate the contamination rate of patient-ready gastrointestinal endoscopes. Subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate differences among endoscope types, countries, and colony-forming unit (CFU) thresholds. Results Twenty studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including 1,059 positive cultures from 7,903 samples. The total contamination rate was 19.98% +/- 0.024 (95% confidence interval [Cl]: 15.29%-24.68 %; I-2=98.6%). The contamination rates of colonoscope and gastroscope channels were 31.95%+/- 0.084 and 28.22%+/- 0.076, respectively. Duodenoscope channels showed a contamination rate of 14.41% +/- 0.029. The contamination rates among studies conducted in North America and Europe were 6.01%+/- 0.011 and 18.16% +/- 0.053 %, respectively. The contamination rate among studies using a CFU threshold > 20 showed contamination of 30.36%+/- 0.094, whereas studies using a CFU threshold < 20 showed a contamination rate of 11%+/- 0.026. Conclusions On average, 19.98% of reprocessed gastrointestinal endoscopes may be contaminated when used in patients and varies between different geographies. These findings highlight that the elevator mechanism is not the only obstacle when reprocessing reusable endoscopes; therefore, guidelines should recommend more surveillance of the endoscope channels as well.
引用
收藏
页码:E840 / E853
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MAUDE Adverse Event Report
[2]   Gastroscopy-associated transmission of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa [J].
Bajolet, O. ;
Ciocan, D. ;
Vallet, C. ;
de Champs, C. ;
Vernet-Garnier, V. ;
Guillard, T. ;
Brasme, L. ;
Thiefin, G. ;
Cadiot, G. ;
Bureau-Chalot, F. .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2013, 83 (04) :341-343
[3]   Concept of disposable duodenoscope: at what cost? [J].
Bang, Ji Young ;
Sutton, Bryce ;
Hawes, Robert ;
Varadarajulu, Shyam .
GUT, 2019, 68 (11) :1915-1917
[4]   Prospective assessment of the effectiveness of standard high-level disinfection for echoendoscopes [J].
Becq, Aymeric ;
Snyder, Graham M. ;
Heroux, Riley ;
Wright, Sharon B. ;
Bharadwaj, Shishira ;
Cohen, Jonah ;
Gabr, Moamen ;
Berzin, Tyler M. ;
Pleskow, Douglas K. ;
Sawhney, Mandeep S. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (05) :984-989
[5]   Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS) [J].
Beg, Sabina ;
Ragunath, Krish ;
Wyman, Andrew ;
Banks, Matthew ;
Trudgill, Nigel ;
Pritchard, Mark D. ;
Riley, Stuart ;
Anderson, John ;
Griffiths, Helen ;
Bhandari, Pradeep ;
Kaye, Phillip ;
Veitch, Andrew .
GUT, 2017, 66 (11) :1886-1899
[6]   ESGE-ESGENA guideline for quality assurance in reprocessing: Microbiological surveillance testing in endoscopy [J].
Beilenhoff, U. ;
Neumann, C. S. ;
Rey, J. F. ;
Biering, H. ;
Blum, R. ;
Schmidt, V. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 39 (02) :175-181
[7]   Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories used in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Position Statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) - Update 2018 [J].
Beilenhoff, Ulrike ;
Biering, Holger ;
Blum, Reinhard ;
Brljak, Jadranka ;
Cimbro, Monica ;
Dumonceau, Jean-Marc ;
Hassan, Cesare ;
Jung, Michael ;
Kampf, Birgit ;
Neumann, Christiane ;
Pietsch, Michael ;
Pineau, Lionel ;
Ponchon, Thierry ;
Rejchrt, Stanislav ;
Rey, Jean-Francois ;
Schmidt, Verona ;
Tillett, Jayne ;
van Hooft, Jeanin E. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 50 (12) :1205-1234
[8]  
Borenstein M., 2009, INTRO METAANALYSIS, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470743386
[9]   Guidelines for safety in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit [J].
Calderwood, Audrey H. ;
Chapman, Frank J. ;
Cohen, Jonathan ;
Cohen, Lawrence B. ;
Collins, James ;
Day, Lukejohn W. ;
Early, Dayna S. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 79 (03) :363-372
[10]   Risk of Infection Transmission in Curvilinear Array Echoendoscopes: Results of a Prospective Reprocessing and Culture Registry [J].
Chapman, Christopher G. ;
Siddiqui, Uzma D. ;
Konda, Vani J. ;
Waxman, Irving .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (05) :AB128-AB128