Behavioral approaches to the assessment of attention in animals

被引:128
|
作者
Bushnell, PJ [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Div Neurotoxicol, Natl Hlth & Environm Effects Res Lab, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
关键词
attention; anima; assessment; behavioral procedure; cognitive process; validity;
D O I
10.1007/s002130050668
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Increasing awareness that disorders of attention may underlie cognitive dysfunctions associated with intoxication and neurodegenerative disease has stimulated research into the neural bases of attention. Because attention comprises a constellation of hypothetical cognitive processes, it can only be inferred from behavior, of either human or non-human subjects, under appropriate experimental conditions. Many behavioral procedures have been proposed for modeling attention in animals, but not all of these procedures have been systematically associated with specific attentional processes. This review endeavors to evaluate critically the construct validity of these procedures (i.e., to determine the degree io which a given procedure assesses a particular process) and to suggest experiments to improve the conceptual links between these procedures and the processes they purport to assess. Five categories of processes have been identified from the animal literature: orienting, expectancy, stimulus differentiation (including stimulus salience, discrimination of a critical stimulus from its context, and selection among stimuli), sustained attention, and parallel processing. The review discusses the strengths and weaknesses of specific behavioral procedures for assessing these categories of attentional processes and, given the conceptual uncertainties involved, it attempts to summarize the present state of knowledge of the pharmacology and neurobiology of attention.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 259
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Assessing Attention in Category Learning by Animals
    Wasserman, Edward A.
    Castro, Leyre
    CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 30 (06) : 495 - 502
  • [12] Mapping attention during gameplay: Assessment of behavioral and ERP markers in an auditory oddball task
    Castellar, Elena Patricia Nunez
    Antons, Jan-Niklas
    Marinazzo, Daniele
    Van Looy, Jan
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 56 (07)
  • [13] Identifying Bully Victims: Definitional Versus Behavioral Approaches
    Green, Jennifer Greif
    Felix, Erika D.
    Sharkey, Jill D.
    Furlong, Michael J.
    Kras, Jennifer E.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2013, 25 (02) : 651 - 657
  • [14] Observer 8: Outliers, Attention, and Situated Knowledge in a Qualitative Behavioral Assessment of Laboratory Mouse Welfare
    Tomlinson, Maisie
    SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2024,
  • [15] Assessment of Attention in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Problems in Primary Care Settings
    Peter C. Entwistle
    Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 2000, 7 : 159 - 166
  • [16] Assessment of attention in children with attention deficit hyperactivity problems in primary care settings
    Entwistle, PC
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY IN MEDICAL SETTINGS, 2000, 7 (03) : 159 - 166
  • [17] Animals in Upright Postures Attract Attention in Humans
    Yorzinski, Jessica L.
    Coss, Richard G.
    EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 6 (01) : 30 - 37
  • [18] Dangerous Animals Capture and Maintain Attention in Humans
    Yorzinski, Jessica L.
    Penkunas, Michael J.
    Platt, Michael L.
    Coss, Richard G.
    EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 12 (03): : 534 - 548
  • [19] Preferential attention to animals and people is independent of the amygdala
    Wang, Shuo
    Tsuchiya, Naotsugu
    New, Joshua
    Hurlemann, Rene
    Adolphs, Ralph
    SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 10 (03) : 371 - 380
  • [20] Intelligence, Attention, and Behavioral Outcomes in Internationally Adopted Girls with a History of Institutionalization
    Petranovich, Christine L.
    Walz, Nicolay Chertkoff
    Staat, Mary Allen
    Chiu, Chung-Yiu Peter
    Wade, Shari L.
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2015, 29 (05) : 639 - 655