It all make sense: biomedical knowledge, causal connections and memory in the novice diagnostician

被引:137
作者
Woods, Nicole N.
Brooks, Lee R.
Norman, Geoffrey R.
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Wilson Ctr, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol Behav & Neruosci, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
关键词
basic science; causal knowledge; clinical reasoning; memory; undergraduate medical education; concept formation;
D O I
10.1007/s10459-006-9055-x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Although there is consensus among medical educators that students must receive training in the biomedical sciences, little is known regarding the role of biomedical knowledge in diagnosis. The present paper presents two studies examining the role of biomedical knowledge, specifically knowledge of causal mechanisms, in novice diagnosticians. In Experiment 1, two groups of participants are taught to diagnose a series of artificial diseases. In the causal learning condition students learn the underlying causal mechanisms for each feature. A second group learns the same diseases without the causal explanations. Participants are asked to diagnose a series of written cases immediately after training and again 1 week later. The results show that students who learn a causal model are better able to retain their diagnostic performance over time (89% correct vs. 78%). This finding is investigated further in Experiment 2, demonstrating that students rely more on casual information after a delay (mean probability of 57% vs. 43%). Together, the studies suggest that knowledge of underlying causal mechanisms can aid student memory for diagnostic categories and that use of causal knowledge changes over time.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 415
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Causal status as a determinant of feature centrality [J].
Ahn, WK ;
Kim, NS ;
Lassaline, ME ;
Dennis, MJ .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 41 (04) :361-416
[2]   The role of basic science knowledge and clinical knowledge in diagnostic reasoning: A structural equation modeling approach [J].
de Bruin, ABH ;
Schmidt, HG ;
Rikers, RMJP .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2005, 80 (08) :765-773
[3]  
Elstein AS, 2000, CLINICAL REASONING IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2ND EDITION, P95
[4]   DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE AND HYPOTHESIS GENERATION IN DIAGNOSTIC REASONING [J].
JOSEPH, GM ;
PATEL, VL .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1990, 10 (01) :31-46
[5]   Clinical psychologists' theory-based representations of mental disorders predict their diagnostic reasoning and memory [J].
Kim, NS ;
Ahn, WK .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2002, 131 (04) :451-476
[6]   CONTEXT AND STRUCTURE IN CONCEPTUAL COMBINATION [J].
MEDIN, DL ;
SHOBEN, EJ .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 20 (02) :158-190
[7]   CLINICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING BY MEDICAL-STUDENTS - A CROSS-SECTIONAL AND LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS [J].
NEUFELD, VR ;
NORMAN, GR ;
FEIGHTNER, JW ;
BARROWS, HS .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1981, 15 (05) :315-322
[8]   The Non-Analytical Basis of Clinical Reasoning [J].
Norman, Geoffrey R. ;
Brooks, Lee R. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 1997, 2 (02) :173-184
[9]  
Norman GR, 1994, TEACH LEARN MED, V6, P114, DOI DOI 10.1080/10401339409539657
[10]  
Patel V. L., 2000, CLIN REASONING HLTH, P117