CT of the normal temporal bone:: Comparison of multiand single-detector row CT

被引:40
作者
Jäger, L
Bonell, H
Liebl, M
Srivastav, S
Arbusow, V
Hempel, M
Reiser, M
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Klinikum Grosshadern, Inst Clin Radiol, D-81366 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, Klinikum Grosshadern, Dept Neurol, D-81366 Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Munich, Klinikum Grosshadern, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, D-81366 Munich, Germany
[4] Tulane Univ, Dept Biostat, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2351020895
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate multi- and single-detector row computed tomographic (CT) depiction of anatomic landmarks of temporal bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. In 50 tempora ones, transverse an corona single-detector row CT images were compared with transverse and reformatted coronal multi-detector row CT images obtained of additional 50 temporal bones. Two radiologists evaluated images. Visibility of 50 landmarks was scored with a five-point quality rating scale. Fisher exact test, K statistics, and Mann-Whitney U test were used to evaluate imaging technique and landmark visibility. RESULTS: In delineating landmarks, total interobserver agreement was higher (P < .001) for transverse multi- than for single-detector row CT images. In 60% of landmarks, interobserver agreement was higher (P < .001) for transverse multi- than for single-detector row CT images. In 20% of landmarks, there was no difference, and in another 20% of landmarks, interobserver agreement was higher (P < .01) for single-detector row CT. Total interobserver agreement was higher (P < .01) for coronal multi-detector row reformations than for coronal single-detector row images. In 58% of landmarks, interobserver agreement was higher (P < .001) for coronal multi-detector row reformations than for coronal single-detector row images, while there was no difference in 8%. In 34% of landmarks, interobserver agreement was higher (P < .001) for coronal single-detector row images. Frequency of detected landmarks was higher for transverse (82%) and coronal (88%) multi-detector row images than for corresponding single-detector row images. In 72% of landmarks, transverse multi-detector row images were (P < .05) superior to corresponding transverse single-detector row images in landmark delineation. In 56% of landmarks, reformatted coronal multi-detector row images were (P < .05) superior to coronal single-detector row images in landmark delineation. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT images, including reformations, better delineate temporal bone anatomy than do single-detector row CT images. (C) RSNA, 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 141
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Arbusow V, 1999, ANN NEUROL, V46, P416, DOI 10.1002/1531-8249(199909)46:3<416::AID-ANA20>3.0.CO
  • [2] 2-W
  • [3] BAXTER A, 1971, Journal of Laryngology and Otology, V85, P587, DOI 10.1017/S0022215100073849
  • [4] BEDDARD D, 1962, Laryngoscope, V72, P112
  • [5] MORPHOLOGY OF VESTIBULAR NERVE .1. ANATOMICAL STUDIES OF VESTIBULAR NERVE IN MAN
    BERGSTROM, B
    [J]. ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 1973, 76 (2-3) : 162 - 172
  • [6] Temporal bone: Comparison of isotropic helical CT and conventional direct axial and coronal CT
    Caldemeyer, KS
    Sandrasegaran, K
    Shinaver, CN
    Mathews, VP
    Smith, RR
    Kopecky, KK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (06) : 1675 - 1682
  • [7] Dimopoulos PA, 1996, ACTA RADIOL, V37, P49
  • [8] Normal canals at the fundus of the internal auditory canal: CT evaluation
    Fatterpekar, GM
    Mukherji, SK
    Lin, YH
    Alley, JG
    Stone, JA
    Castillo, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1999, 23 (05) : 776 - 780
  • [9] CT detection of facial canal dehiscence and semicircular canal fistula: Comparison with surgical findings
    Fuse, T
    Tada, Y
    Aoyagi, M
    Sugai, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1996, 20 (02) : 221 - 224
  • [10] HELMS J, 1981, CRANIAL NERVES, P391