The Emergence of Two Distinct Fertility Regimes in Economically Advanced Countries

被引:48
作者
Rindfuss, Ronald R. [1 ,2 ]
Choe, Minja Kim [2 ]
Brauner-Otto, Sarah R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Carolina Populat Ctr, 206 West Franklin St,Rm 208, Chapel Hill, NC 27516 USA
[2] East West Ctr, 1601 East West Rd, Honolulu, HI 96848 USA
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Sociol, Room 713,Leacock Bldg,855 Sherbrooke St West, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T7, Canada
关键词
Fertility; Developed countries; Institutions; Policies; 2ND DEMOGRAPHIC-TRANSITION; LOWEST-LOW FERTILITY; FAMILY POLICIES; CHILD-CARE; EUROPEAN FERTILITY; WOMENS EMPLOYMENT; NATURAL EXPERIMENT; FEMALE EMPLOYMENT; OECD COUNTRIES; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11113-016-9387-z
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Beginning in 2000, in economically advanced countries, a remarkable bifurcation in fertility levels has emerged, with one group in the moderate range of period total fertility rates, about 1.9, and the other at 1.3. The upper branch consists of countries in Northern and Western Europe, Oceania and the United States; the lower branch includes Central, Southern, and Eastern Europe, and East and Southeast Asia. A review of the major theories for low-fertility countries reveals that none of them would have predicted this specific bifurcation. We argue that those countries with fertility levels close to replacement level have institutional arrangements, and related policies, that make it easier, not easy, for women to combine the worker and mother roles. The institutional details are quite different across countries, suggesting that multiple combinations of institutional arrangements and policies can lead to the same country-level fertility outcome. Canada, the only exception to this bifurcation, illustrates the importance of the different institutional structures in Quebec compared to the rest of Canada.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 304
页数:18
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [51] McDonald P, 2009, ROUT RES PUB SOC POL, P23
  • [52] Mills M. C., 2015, LOW LOWER FERTILITY
  • [53] Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives
    Mills, Melinda
    Rindfuss, Ronald R.
    McDonald, Peter
    Velde, Egbert Te
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2011, 17 (06) : 848 - 860
  • [54] New Cohort Fertility Forecasts for the Developed World: Rises, Falls, and Reversals
    Myrskylae, Mikko
    Goldstein, Joshua R.
    Cheng, Yen-hsin Alice
    [J]. POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2013, 39 (01) : 31 - +
  • [55] Consequences of Family Policies on Childbearing Behavior: Effects or Artifacts?
    Neyer, Gerda
    Andersson, Gunnar
    [J]. POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2008, 34 (04) : 699 - +
  • [56] Why Demographic Suicide? The Puzzles of European Fertility
    Pritchett, Lant
    Viarengo, Martina
    [J]. POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2013, 38 : 55 - 71
  • [57] Child-Care Availability and Fertility in Norway
    Rindfuss, Ronald R.
    Guilkey, David K.
    Morgan, S. Philip
    Kravdal, Oystein
    [J]. POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2010, 36 (04) : 725 - +
  • [58] Rindfuss Ronald R, 2008, Vienna Yearb Popul Res, V2008, P57
  • [59] The changing institutional context of low fertility
    Rindfuss, RR
    Guzzo, KB
    Morgan, SP
    [J]. POPULATION RESEARCH AND POLICY REVIEW, 2003, 22 (5-6) : 411 - 438
  • [60] Rovny A. E., 2011, J EUROPEAN SOCIAL PO, V21, P1