Detection of amplified oncogenes by genome DNA microarrays in human primary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with conventional comparative genomic hybridization analysis

被引:40
作者
Arai, H
Ueno, T
Tangoku, A
Yoshino, S
Abe, T
Kawauchi, S
Oga, A
Furuya, T
Oka, M
Sasaki, K
机构
[1] Yamaguchi Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Ube, Yamaguchi 7558505, Japan
[2] Yamaguchi Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg 2, Ube, Yamaguchi 7558505, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0165-4608(03)00106-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Oncogene amplification in 20 surgically resected esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC) was examined with DNA microarrays that detected 57 oncogenes and two reference DNA. Alterations in DNA copy numbers detected by microarrays were compared to those obtained by conventional comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Amplification of eight oncogenes (CCND1, FGF3/FGF4, EMS1, SAS, ERBB2, PDGFRA, MYC, and BCL2) was detected by DNA microarrays in 9 of 20 tumors. Although ERBB2 was 23.2 times higher than the control level in one case, the average magnitude of gene amplification was approximately two to four times that of the control level. EMS1, CCND1, and FGF3/FGF4, which are all located on 11q13, were amplified in 7, 5, and 4 of 20 ESCC, respectively, and they were coamplified in 3 tumors. A comparison of genome DNA microarrays and CGH data revealed that although most amplified oncogenes were included in chromosomal regions for which DNA copy number gains were detected by conventional CGH, not all amplified genes on microarrays showed concomitant DNA copy number gains on CGH. In conclusion, microarrays of oncogenes are useful for the comprehensive identification of amplified oncogenes and for analysis of areas of specific amplification within chromosomal regions with DNA copy number increases detected by CGH analysis. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 21
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Akervall JA, 1997, CANCER, V79, P380
  • [2] Bentz M, 1998, GENE CHROMOSOME CANC, V21, P172, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199802)21:2<172::AID-GCC14>3.3.CO
  • [3] 2-T
  • [4] Hashimoto Y, 2000, CYTOMETRY, V40, P161, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(20000601)40:2<161::AID-CYTO10>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-M
  • [6] Comparative genomic hybridization: A new tool in cancer pathology
    Hermsen, MAJA
    Meijer, GA
    Baak, JPA
    Joenje, H
    Walboomers, JJM
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1996, 27 (04) : 342 - 349
  • [7] COMPLEX KARYOTYPE WITH AN 11Q13 HOMOGENEOUSLY STAINING REGION IN ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA
    JIN, C
    MERTENS, F
    JIN, YS
    WENNERBERG, J
    HEIM, S
    MITELMAN, F
    [J]. CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 1995, 82 (02) : 175 - 176
  • [8] OPTIMIZING COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION FOR ANALYSIS OF DNA-SEQUENCE COPY NUMBER CHANGES IN SOLID TUMORS
    KALLIONIEMI, OP
    KALLIONIEMI, A
    PIPER, J
    ISOLA, J
    WALDMAN, FM
    GRAY, JW
    PINKEL, D
    [J]. GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER, 1994, 10 (04) : 231 - 243
  • [9] KALLIONIEMI OP, 1993, SEMIN CANCER BIOL, V4, P41
  • [10] Online access to CGH data of DNA sequence copy number changes
    Knuutila, S
    Autio, K
    Aalto, Y
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2000, 157 (02) : 689 - 689