Treatment of bladder cancer in the elderly

被引:26
作者
Erlich, Annette [1 ]
Zlotta, Alexandre R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Urol, 60 Murray St 6th Floor,Room 6004,Box 19, Toronto, ON M5T 3L9, Canada
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Surg Oncol, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Bladder cancer; Cystectomy; Elderly; Geriatric; Treatment; OPEN RADICAL CYSTECTOMY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BACILLE CALMETTE-GUERIN; URINARY-DIVERSION; 90-DAY MORTALITY; ORTHOTOPIC NEOBLADDER; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; ILEAL CONDUIT; RISK-FACTORS; AGE;
D O I
10.4111/icu.2016.57.S1.S26
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
As the population ages and life expectancy increases in the human population, more individuals will be diagnosed with bladder cancer (BC). The definition of who is elderly is likely to change in the future from the commonly used cut-off of >= 75 years of age. Physiological rather than chronological age is key. BC care in the elderly is likely to become a very common problem in daily practice. Concerns have been raised that senior BC patients are not given treatments that could cure their disease. Clinicians lack quantitative and reliable estimates of competing mortality risks when considering treatments for BC. Majority of patients diagnosed with BC are elderly, making treatment decisions complex with their increasing number of comorbidities. A multidisciplinary approach to these patients may be a way to incorporate discussion from various disciplines regarding treatment options available. Here we review various treatment options for elderly patients with muscle invasive BC and nonmuscle invasive BC. We include differences in treatments from robotic versus open radical cystectomy, various urinary diversion techniques, chemotherapy, radiation therapy and combination treatments. In clinical practice, treatment decisions for elderly patients should be done on a case-by-case basis, tailored to each patient with their specific histories and comorbidities considered. Some healthy elderly patients may be better candidates for extensive curative treatments than their younger counterparts. This implies that these important, life-altering decisions cannot be solely based on age as many other factors can affect patient survival outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:S26 / S35
页数:10
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Health related quality of life (HRQoL) after cystectomy: Comparison between orthotopic neobladder and ileal conduit diversion [J].
Ali, A. S. ;
Hayes, M. C. ;
Birch, B. ;
Dudderidge, T. ;
Somani, B. K. .
EJSO, 2015, 41 (03) :295-299
[2]   Psychometric Characteristics of a Condition-specific, Health-related Quality-of-life Survey: The FACT-Vanderbilt Cystectomy Index [J].
Anderson, Christopher B. ;
Feurer, Irene D. ;
Large, Michael C. ;
Steinberg, Gary D. ;
Barocas, Daniel A. ;
Cookson, Michael S. ;
Penson, David F. .
UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (01) :77-83
[3]  
[Anonymous], UROL ONCOL
[4]  
[Anonymous], SEER STAT FACT SHEET
[5]  
[Anonymous], BJU INT
[6]  
[Anonymous], EUR UROL
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, POP PROJ CAN PROV TE
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, UROL ONCOL
[9]   Prediction of 90-day Mortality After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer in a Prospective European Multicenter Cohort [J].
Aziz, Atiqullah ;
May, Matthias ;
Burger, Maximilian ;
Palisaar, Rein-Jueri ;
Quoc-Dien Trinh ;
Fritsche, Hans-Martin ;
Rink, Michael ;
Chun, Felix ;
Martini, Thomas ;
Bolenz, Christian ;
Mayr, Roman ;
Pycha, Armin ;
Nuhn, Philipp ;
Stief, Christian ;
Novotny, Vladimir ;
Wirth, Manfred ;
Seitz, Christian ;
Noldus, Joachim ;
Gilfrich, Christian ;
Shariat, Shahrokh F. ;
Brookman-May, Sabine ;
Bastian, Patrick J. ;
Denzinger, Stefan ;
Gierth, Michael ;
Roghmann, Florian .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (01) :156-163
[10]   The Importance of Surgeon Characteristics on Impacting Oncologic Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy [J].
Bhindi, Bimal ;
Yu, Julie ;
Kuk, Cynthia ;
Sridhar, Srikala S. ;
Hamilton, Robert J. ;
Finelli, Antonio ;
Jewett, Michael A. S. ;
Evans, Andrew ;
Fleshner, Neil E. ;
Zlotta, Alexandre R. ;
Kulkarni, Girish S. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (03) :714-719