Comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil during anaesthesia for patients undergoing direct laryngoscopy without intubation

被引:9
|
作者
Wiel, E
Davette, M
Carpentier, L
Fayoux, P
Erb, C
Chevalier, D
Vallet, B
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Lille, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care Med, F-59037 Lille, France
[2] Univ Hosp Lille, ENT Facil, F-59037 Lille, France
关键词
adults; anaesthetic techniques; direct laryngoscopy; analgesics opioid; alfentanil; remifentanil; surgery; ENT;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aeg198
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. Remifentanil and alfentanil are opioids often used during direct laryngoscopy (DL). This prospective, randomized study compared these agents with respect to haemodynamic and Bispectral Index (BIS) responses, glottic visualization, and rapidity of recovery (spontaneous ventilation, eye opening) in DL without intubation. Methods. A total of 60 patients undergoing DL were randomized into two groups: remifentanil (R) and alfentanil (A). Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5 mg kg(-1) and the opioid was administered 1 min later (R=2 mug kg(-1) or A=30 mug kg(-1) over 30 s). DL was commenced 1 min after (corresponding to 3 min after the beginning of induction). Glottic visualization, opioid and/or propofol re-injection, spontaneous ventilation recovery, and eye opening were recorded. Results. During DL, mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased by 6% in the R group vs 20% in the A group (P<0.05) when compared with post-induction values without affecting heart rate or BIS. No significant difference was observed between groups with respect to glottic exposure, opioid and/or propofol re-injection, and spontaneous ventilation recovery (mean (sem) 3.8 (0.6) min, R group vs 3.2 (0.7) min, A group, NS) or eye opening (7.1 (1.1) min, R group vs 7.4 (0.9) min, A group, NS). Thirty minutes after postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) admission, MAP returned to its pre-induction value in the R group (104 (3) vs 109 (3) at baseline, NS), whereas in the A group MAP remained significantly lower at this time point (96 (4) vs 106 (3) at baseline, P<0.05). Conclusion. This study showed that only remifentanil prevented MAP increase without adverse effects such as bradycardia during DL, and prevented MAP decrease 30 min after PACU admission.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 423
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bolus dose remifentanil for control of haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia
    O'Hare, R
    McAtamney, D
    Mirakhur, RK
    Hughes, D
    Carabine, U
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (02) : 283 - 285
  • [22] Effects of remifentanil on cardiovascular and bispectral index responses to endotracheal intubation in severe pre-eclamptic patients undergoing Caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia
    Yoo, K. Y.
    Jeong, C. W.
    Park, B. Y.
    Kim, S. J.
    Jeong, S. T.
    Shin, M. H.
    Lee, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 102 (06) : 812 - 819
  • [23] Comparison of video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation during pediatric oral surgery: a randomized clinical trial
    Canakci, Ebru
    Gultekin, Ahmet
    Cebeci, Zubeyir
    Coskun, Ilker
    Tas, Nilay
    Altinbas, Ali
    KUWAIT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 56 (03):
  • [24] The comparison of Alfentanil and Remifentanil infusion during anesthesia on post-anesthesia recovery
    Entezariasl, Masood
    Akhavanakbari, Godrat
    Isazadehfar, Khatereh
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 6 (04) : 323 - 326
  • [25] Comparison of remifentanil with dexmedetomidine for monitored anaesthesia care in elderly patients during vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty
    Lee, Jung Min
    Lee, Soo Kyung
    Lee, Sang Jun
    Hwang, Woon Suk
    Jang, Sung Wook
    Park, Eun Young
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 44 (02) : 307 - 316
  • [26] Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for intubation in emergency department patients with cardiac arrest: A multicentre study
    Okamoto, Hiroshi
    Goto, Tadahiro
    Wong, Zoie S. Y.
    Hagiwara, Yusuke
    Watase, Hiroko
    Hasegawa, Kohei
    RESUSCITATION, 2019, 136 : 70 - 77
  • [27] Comparison of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil for total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery
    Ahonen, J
    Olkkola, KT
    Hynynen, M
    Seppälä, T
    Ikävalko, H
    Remmerie, B
    Salmenperä, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 85 (04) : 533 - 540
  • [28] Comparison of the effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on cardiovascular response to nasotracheal intubation: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study
    Olmez, G
    Ozyilmaz, MA
    Menekse, A
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2005, 66 (04): : 385 - 393
  • [29] Comparison of the effects of remifentanil and remifentanil plus lidocaine on intubation conditions in intellectually disabled patients
    Eyigor, Can
    Cagiran, Esra
    Balcioglu, Taner
    Uyar, Meltem
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2014, 64 (04): : 263 - 268
  • [30] THE COMPARISON OF ATRACURIUM AND REMIFENTANIL EFFECT ON JAW RELAXATION AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION CONDITION WITHOUT MUSCLE RELAXANT IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE SURGERY
    Yazdi, Bijan
    Khalili, Mohammad
    Dadashpour, Niloufar
    Nasab, Seyed Masoud Mousavi
    Khabiri, Mohammad
    Eraghi, Majid Golestani
    ACTA MEDICA MEDITERRANEA, 2016, 32 : 1029 - 1032