Development and validation of a frailty index compatible with three interRAI assessment instruments

被引:9
|
作者
Abey-Nesbit, Rebecca [1 ]
Bergler, Ulrich [1 ]
Pickering, John W. [1 ]
Nishtala, Prasad S. [2 ]
Jamieson, Hamish [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Med, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Univ Bath, Ctr Therapeut Innovat, Dept Pharm & Pharmacol, Bath, Avon, England
关键词
frailty; frailty index; aged care; international Residential Assessment Instrument assessments (interRAI); geriatric assessment; older people; ACCUMULATION; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1093/ageing/afac178
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background a Frailty Index (FI) calculated by the accumulation of deficits is often used to quantify the extent of frailty in individuals in specific settings. This study aimed to derive a FI that can be applied across three standardised international Residential Assessment Instrument assessments (interRAI), used at different stages of ageing and the corresponding increase in support needs. Methods deficit items common to the interRAI Contact Assessment (CA), Home Care (HC) or Long-Term Care Facilities assessment (LTCF) were identified and recoded to form a cumulative deficit FI. The index was validated using a large dataset of needs assessments of older people in New Zealand against mortality prediction using Kaplan Meier curves and logistic regression models. The index was further validated by comparing its performance with a previously validated index in the HC cohort. Results the index comprised 15 questions across seven domains. The assessment cohort and their mean frailty (SD) were: 89,506 CA with 0.26 (0.15), 151,270 HC with 0.36 (0.15) and 83,473 LTCF with 0.41 (0.17). The index predicted 1-year mortality for each of the CA, HC and LTCF, cohorts with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.741 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.718-0.762), 0.687 (95%CI: 0.684-0.690) and 0.674 (95%CI: 0.670-0.678), respectively. Conclusions the results for this multi-instrument FI are congruent with the differences in frailty expected for people in the target settings for these instruments and appropriately associated with mortality at each stage of the journey of progressive ageing.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validation of the Kihon Checklist and the frailty screening index for frailty defined by the phenotype model in older Japanese adults
    Watanabe, Daiki
    Yoshida, Tsukasa
    Watanabe, Yuya
    Yamada, Yosuke
    Miyachi, Motohiko
    Kimura, Misaka
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [32] The Italian version of the “frailty index” based on deficits in health: a validation study
    Pasquale Abete
    Claudia Basile
    Giulia Bulli
    Francesco Curcio
    Ilaria Liguori
    David Della-Morte
    Gaetano Gargiulo
    Assunta Langellotto
    Gianluca Testa
    Gianluigi Galizia
    Domenico Bonaduce
    Francesco Cacciatore
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2017, 29 : 913 - 926
  • [33] Frailty assessment instruments in heart failure: A systematic review
    McDonagh, Julee
    Martin, Lily
    Ferguson, Caleb
    Jha, Sunita R.
    Macdonald, Peter S.
    Davidson, Patricia M.
    Newton, Phillip J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2018, 17 (01) : 23 - 35
  • [34] The Italian version of the "frailty index" based on deficits in health: a validation study
    Abete, Pasquale
    Basile, Claudia
    Bulli, Giulia
    Curcio, Francesco
    Liguori, Ilaria
    Della-Morte, David
    Gargiulo, Gaetano
    Langellotto, Assunta
    Testa, Gianluca
    Galizia, Gianluigi
    Bonaduce, Domenico
    Cacciatore, Francesco
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2017, 29 (05) : 913 - 926
  • [35] Development of a Frailty Index in the Irish Hip Fracture Database
    Mary Walsh
    Helena Ferris
    Louise Brent
    Emer Ahern
    Tara Coughlan
    Roman Romero-Ortuno
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 4447 - 4454
  • [36] External validation of CLI Frailty Index and assessment of predictive value of modified CLI Frailty Index for patients with critical limb ischemia undergoing infrainguinal revascularization
    Morisaki, Koichi
    Furuyama, Tadashi
    Matsubara, Yutaka
    Inoue, Kentaro
    Kurose, Shun
    Yoshino, Shinichiro
    Nakayama, Ken
    Yamashita, Sho
    Yoshiya, Keiji
    Yoshiga, Ryosuke
    Maehara, Yoshihiko
    VASCULAR, 2019, 27 (04) : 405 - 410
  • [37] Development and Validation of a Clinical Frailty Index for the World Trade Center General Responder Cohort
    Bello, Ghalib A.
    Ornstein, Katherine A.
    Lucchini, Roberto G.
    Hung, William W.
    Ko, Fred C.
    Colicino, Elena
    Taioli, Emanuela
    Crane, Michael A.
    Todd, Andrew C.
    JOURNAL OF AGING AND HEALTH, 2021, 33 (7-8) : 531 - 544
  • [38] Development of a Frailty Index in the Irish Hip Fracture Database
    Walsh, Mary
    Ferris, Helena
    Brent, Louise
    Ahern, Emer
    Coughlan, Tara
    Romero-Ortuno, Roman
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (07) : 4447 - 4454
  • [39] Development and validation of the FRAGIRE tool for assessment an older person's risk for frailty
    Vernerey, Dewi
    Anota, Amelie
    Vandel, Pierre
    Paget-Bailly, Sophie
    Dion, Michele
    Bailly, Vanessa
    Bonin, Marie
    Pozet, Astrid
    Foubert, Audrey
    Benetkiewicz, Magdalena
    Mankoundia, Patrick
    Bonnetain, Franck
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2016, 16 : 1 - 28
  • [40] The Comprehensive Rheumatologic Assessment of Frailty (CRAF): development and validation of a multidimensional frailty screening tool in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
    Salaffi, F.
    Di Carlo, M.
    Farah, S.
    Carotti, M.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 38 (03) : 488 - 499