Development and validation of a frailty index compatible with three interRAI assessment instruments

被引:9
|
作者
Abey-Nesbit, Rebecca [1 ]
Bergler, Ulrich [1 ]
Pickering, John W. [1 ]
Nishtala, Prasad S. [2 ]
Jamieson, Hamish [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Med, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Univ Bath, Ctr Therapeut Innovat, Dept Pharm & Pharmacol, Bath, Avon, England
关键词
frailty; frailty index; aged care; international Residential Assessment Instrument assessments (interRAI); geriatric assessment; older people; ACCUMULATION; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1093/ageing/afac178
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background a Frailty Index (FI) calculated by the accumulation of deficits is often used to quantify the extent of frailty in individuals in specific settings. This study aimed to derive a FI that can be applied across three standardised international Residential Assessment Instrument assessments (interRAI), used at different stages of ageing and the corresponding increase in support needs. Methods deficit items common to the interRAI Contact Assessment (CA), Home Care (HC) or Long-Term Care Facilities assessment (LTCF) were identified and recoded to form a cumulative deficit FI. The index was validated using a large dataset of needs assessments of older people in New Zealand against mortality prediction using Kaplan Meier curves and logistic regression models. The index was further validated by comparing its performance with a previously validated index in the HC cohort. Results the index comprised 15 questions across seven domains. The assessment cohort and their mean frailty (SD) were: 89,506 CA with 0.26 (0.15), 151,270 HC with 0.36 (0.15) and 83,473 LTCF with 0.41 (0.17). The index predicted 1-year mortality for each of the CA, HC and LTCF, cohorts with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.741 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.718-0.762), 0.687 (95%CI: 0.684-0.690) and 0.674 (95%CI: 0.670-0.678), respectively. Conclusions the results for this multi-instrument FI are congruent with the differences in frailty expected for people in the target settings for these instruments and appropriately associated with mortality at each stage of the journey of progressive ageing.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Frailty Scale for Clinical Geriatric Assessment
    Shin, J.
    Kim, M.
    Choi, J.
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING, 2021, 25 (07) : 938 - 943
  • [22] Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Frailty Scale for Clinical Geriatric Assessment
    J. Shin
    M. Kim
    Jaekyung Choi
    The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2021, 25 : 938 - 943
  • [23] A Computerized Frailty Assessment Tool at Points-of-Care: Development of a Standalone Electronic Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment/Frailty Index (eFI-CGA)
    Sepehri, Katayoun
    Braley, McKenzie Sarah
    Chinda, Betty
    Zou, Macy
    Tang, Brandon
    Park, Grace
    Garm, Antonina
    McDermid, Robert
    Rockwood, Kenneth
    Song, Xiaowei
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 8
  • [24] Predicting outcome after hip fracture: using a frailty index to integrate comprehensive geriatric assessment results
    Krishnan, Manju
    Beck, Sue
    Havelock, Will
    Eeles, Eamonn
    Hubbard, Ruth E.
    Johansen, Antony
    AGE AND AGEING, 2014, 43 (01) : 122 - 126
  • [25] Recalibration and External Validation of the Risk Analysis Index A Surgical Frailty Assessment Tool
    Arya, Shipra
    Varley, Patrick
    Youk, Ada
    Borrebach, Jeffrey D.
    Perez, Sebastian
    Massarweh, Nader N.
    Johanning, Jason M.
    Hall, Daniel E.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 272 (06) : 996 - 1005
  • [26] Social Frailty Index: Development and validation of an index of social attributes predictive of mortality in older adults
    Shah, Sachin J.
    Oreper, Sandra
    Jeon, Sun Young
    Boscardin, W. John
    Fang, Margaret C.
    Covinsky, Kenneth E.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2023, 120 (07)
  • [27] Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data
    Clegg, Andrew
    Bates, Chris
    Young, John
    Ryan, Ronan
    Nichols, Linda
    Teale, Elizabeth Ann
    Mohammed, Mohammed A.
    Parry, John
    Marshall, Tom
    AGE AND AGEING, 2016, 45 (03) : 353 - 360
  • [28] A 10-Item Frailty Index Based on a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (FI-CGA-10) in Older Adults with Cancer: Development and Construct Validation
    Nishijima, Tomohiro F.
    Shimokawa, Mototsugu
    Esaki, Taito
    Morita, Masaru
    Toh, Yasushi
    Muss, Hyman B.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2021, 26 (10) : E1751 - E1760
  • [29] Development and validation of the geriatric trauma frailty index for geriatric trauma patients based on electronic hospital records
    Zhao, Fangjie
    Tang, Bihan
    Liu, Xu
    Weng, Weizong
    Wang, Bo
    Wang, Yincheng
    Zhang, Zhifeng
    Zhang, Lulu
    AGE AND AGEING, 2022, 51 (01)
  • [30] The biological index of frailty: A new index for the assessment of frailty in human skeletal remains
    Zedda, Nicoletta
    Bramanti, Barbara
    Gualdi-Russo, Emanuela
    Ceraico, Elena
    Rinaldo, Natascia
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2021, 176 (03) : 459 - 473