Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy versus Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Localised Prostate Cancer: a Cost-Utility Analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Helou, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Torres, S. [3 ,4 ]
Musunuru, H. B. [1 ,4 ]
Raphael, J. [3 ,4 ]
Cheung, P. [1 ,4 ]
Vesprini, D. [1 ,4 ]
Chung, H. T. [1 ,4 ]
D'Alimonte, L. [1 ,4 ]
Krahn, M. [3 ,5 ]
Morton, G. [1 ,4 ]
Loblaw, A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, 610 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Measurement & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Odette Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Toronto Hlth Econ & Technol Assessment Collaborat, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Cost-utility; low dose rate brachytherapy; prostate cancer; stereotactic body radiotherapy; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIATION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE; LOW-RISK; MULTIINSTITUTIONAL CONSORTIUM; POOLED ANALYSIS; FREE SURVIVAL; THERAPY SBRT; POPULATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.clon.2017.08.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: To conduct a cost-utility analysis comparing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) for localised prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and methods: A decision-analytic Markov model was developed from the healthcare payer perspective to simulate the history of a 66-year-old man with low-risk PCa. The model followed patients yearly over their remaining lifetimes. Health states included 'recurrence-free', 'biochemical recurrence' (BR), 'metastatic' and 'death'. Transition probabilities were based on a retrospective cohort analysis undertaken at our institution. Utilities were derived from the literature. Costs were assigned in 2015 Canadian dollars ($) and reflected Ontario's health system and departmental costs. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. A willingness-to-pay threshold of $ 50 000/QALY was used. Results: SBRT was the dominant strategy with 0.008LYs and 0.029QALYs gained and a reduction in cost of $ 2615. Under base case conditions, our results were sensitive to the BR probability associated with both strategies. LDR-BT becomes the preferred strategy if the BR with SBRT is 1.3*[baseline BR_SBRT] or if the BR with LDR-BT is 0.76*[baseline BR_LDR-BT]. When assuming the same BR for both strategies, LDR-BT becomes marginally more effective with 0.009QALYs gained at a cost of $ 272 848/QALY. Conclusions: SBRT represents an economically attractive radiation strategy. Further research should be carried out to provide longer-term follow-up and high-quality evidence. (C) 2017 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 731
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ablative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and High Dose Rate Brachytherapy
    Ma, Ting Martin
    Lilleby, Oscar
    Lilleby, Wolfgang A.
    Kishan, Amar U.
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (12) : 1 - 20
  • [2] Robot-Assisted Surgery vs Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Utility Analysis
    Farah, Line
    Magne, Nicolas
    Martelli, Nicolas
    Sotton, Sandrine
    Zerbib, Marc
    Borget, Isabelle
    Scher, Nathaniel
    Guetta, Thierry
    Chargari, Cyrus
    Bauduceau, Olivier
    Toledano, Alain
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [3] Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Versus Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy or External Beam Radiotherapy: Propensity Score Matched Analyses of Canadian Data
    Loblaw, A.
    Pickles, T.
    Crook, J.
    Martin, A. -G.
    Vigneault, E.
    Souhami, L.
    Cury, F.
    Morris, J.
    Catton, C.
    Lukka, H.
    Cheung, P.
    Sethukavalan, P.
    Warner, A.
    Yang, Y.
    Rodrigues, G.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 29 (03) : 161 - 170
  • [4] High dose rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for localised prostate cancer
    Strouthos, Iosif
    Tselis, Nikolaos
    Chatzikonstantinou, Georgios
    Butt, Saeed
    Baltas, Dimos
    Bon, Dimitra
    Milickovic, Natasa
    Zamboglou, Nikolaos
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 126 (02) : 270 - 277
  • [5] Hemi-ablative low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy for unilateral localised prostate cancer
    Langley, Stephen
    Uribe, Jennifer
    Uribe-Lewis, Santiago
    Franklin, Adrian
    Perna, Carla
    Horton, Alex
    Cunningham, Melanie
    Higgins, Donna
    Deering, Claire
    Khaksar, Sara
    Laing, Robert
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 125 (03) : 383 - 390
  • [6] High Dose Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Localised Prostate Cancer: Review of the Current Status
    Tselis, N.
    Hoskin, P.
    Baltas, D.
    Strnad, V.
    Zamboglou, N.
    Roedel, C.
    Chatzikonstantinou, G.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 29 (07) : 401 - 411
  • [7] Primary treatments for clinically localised prostate cancer: a comprehensive lifetime cost-utility analysis
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Ramakrishna, Naren R.
    Duff, Steven B.
    Hughes, Kathleen E.
    Sadownik, Sara
    Smith, Joseph A.
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (03) : 437 - 450
  • [8] Combined high dose rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy for clinically localised prostate cancer
    Strouthos, Iosif
    Chatzikonstantinou, Georgios
    Zamboglou, Nikolaos
    Milickovic, Natasa
    Papaioannou, Sokratis
    Bon, Dimitra
    Zamboglou, Constantinos
    Roedel, Claus
    Baltas, Dimos
    Tselis, Nikolaos
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 128 (02) : 301 - 307
  • [9] Long-term outcome of high dose rate brachytherapy in radiotherapy of localised prostate cancer
    Åström, L
    Pedersen, D
    Mercke, C
    Holmäng, S
    Johansson, KA
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 74 (02) : 157 - 161
  • [10] A Pooled Analysis of Biochemical Failure in Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Following Definitive Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) or High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy (HDR-B) Monotherapy
    Hegde, John V.
    Collins, Sean P.
    Fuller, Donald B.
    King, Christopher R.
    Demanes, D. Jeffrey
    Wang, Pin-Chieh
    Kupelian, Patrick A.
    Steinberg, Michael L.
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 41 (05): : 502 - 507