How to formulate research questions and design studies for telehealth assessment and evaluation

被引:26
作者
Fatehi, Farhad [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Smith, Anthony C. [1 ]
Maeder, Anthony [4 ]
Wade, Victoria [5 ]
Gray, Leonard C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Online Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Commonwealth Sci & Ind Res Org, Australian eHlth Res Ctr, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Allied Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Gen Practice, Adelaide, SA, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Telehealth; telemedicine; assessment; evaluation; research question; TELEMEDICINE; HEALTH; CARE;
D O I
10.1177/1357633X16673274
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Planning a research strategy and formulating the right research questions at various stages of developing a telehealth intervention are essential for producing scientific evidence. The aim of research at each stage should correspond to the maturity of the intervention and will require a variety of study designs. Although there are several published evaluation frameworks for telemedicine or telehealth as a subset of broader eHealth domain, there is currently no simple model to guide research planning. In this paper we propose a five-stage model as a framework for planning a comprehensive telehealth research program for a new intervention or service system. The stages are: (1) Concept development, (2) Service design, (3) Pre-implementation, (4) Implementation, (5) Post-implementation, and at each stage a number of studies are considered. Robust evaluation is important for the widespread acceptance and implementation of telehealth. We hope this framework enables researchers, service administrators and clinicians to conceptualise, undertake and appraise telehealth research from the point of view of being able to assess how applicable and valid the research is for their particular circumstances.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 763
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Abdel-Aleem S., 2008, GLOSSARY CLIN TRIAL, P235
  • [2] Al-Yaseen Hussein, 2010, Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, V13, P9
  • [3] [Anonymous], ASSESSING EFFICACY S
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1998, 924111 ISO
  • [5] Telemedicine - is the cart being put before the horse?
    Armfield, Nigel R.
    Edirippulige, Sisira K.
    Bradford, Natalie
    Smith, Anthony C.
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2014, 200 (09) : 530 - 533
  • [6] Brender J., 2006, Handbook of evaluation methods for health informatics
  • [7] Brender McNair J., 2006, HDB EVALUATION METHO
  • [8] Telemedicine, telehealth or e-health? A bibliometric analysis of the trends in the use of these terms
    Fatehi, Farhad
    Wootton, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2012, 18 (08) : 460 - 464
  • [9] Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations
    Levesque, Jean-Frederic
    Harris, Mark F.
    Russell, Grant
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2013, 12
  • [10] Smith AC, 2003, J TELEMED TELECARE, V9, pS58