Hospital staff participation in a national hip fracture audit: facilitators and barriers

被引:4
作者
Voeten, Stijn C. [1 ,2 ]
van Bodegom-Vos, Leti [3 ]
Hegeman, J. H. [4 ]
Wouters, Michel W. J. M. [2 ,5 ]
Krijnen, Pieta [1 ]
Schipper, Inger B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Trauma Surg, Med Ctr, Albinusdreef 2, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Dutch Inst Clin Auditing, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Ziekenhuisgrp Twente, Dept Trauma Surg, Almelo Hengelo, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Canc Inst Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Clinical audit; Implementation science; Hip fractures; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s11657-019-0652-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To ensure meaningful results in a clinical audit, as many hospitals as possible should participate. To optimise participation, the data collection process should either be performed by additional staff or be automated. Active participation may be promoted by offering relevant external parties insight into the actual quality of care. Purpose The aim of the study was to identify which facilitators and barriers experienced by hospital staff are associated with participation in the ongoing nationwide multidisciplinary Dutch Hip Fracture Audit (DHFA). Methods A survey including questions about the respondents' characteristics, hospital level of participation and factors of influence on DHFA participation was sent to hip fracture surgeons. The factors were based on results of semi-structured interviews held with hospital staff involved in hip fracture care. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to establish which respondent characteristics and factors were associated with participation and active participation (>= 80% of patients registered) in the DHFA. Factors significantly increasing the (active) participation in the DHFA were classified as facilitators, and factors significantly decreasing the (active) participation in the DHFA as barriers. Results One hundred nine surgeons filled out the questionnaire. The factors most agreed on were availability of staffing capacity for data collection and automated data import. A lower intention to participate was associated with being an academic surgeon (odds ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.52) and an orthopaedic surgeon (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.90). Data sharing with relevant external parties was associated with active participation (odds ratio, 3.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-8.95). Conclusions To improve participation in a nationwide clinical audit, it seems that the data collection should either be performed by additional staff or be automated. Active participation is facilitated if audit data is made available to other parties, such as insurers, healthcare authorities or policymakers.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems [J].
Atkins, Lou ;
Francis, Jill ;
Islam, Rafat ;
O'Connor, Denise ;
Patey, Andrea ;
Ivers, Noah ;
Foy, Robbie ;
Duncan, Eilidh M. ;
Colquhoun, Heather ;
Grimshaw, Jeremy M. ;
Lawton, Rebecca ;
Michie, Susan .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
[2]   Clinical audit and quality improvement - time for a rethink? [J].
Bowie, Paul ;
Bradley, Nicholas A. ;
Rushmer, Rosemary .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (01) :42-48
[3]   Early outcomes from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit [J].
Busweiler, L. A. D. ;
Wijnhoven, B. P. L. ;
Henegouwen, M. I. van Berge ;
Henneman, D. ;
van Grieken, N. C. T. ;
Wouters, M. W. J. M. ;
van Hillegersberg, R. ;
van Sandick, J. W. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 (13) :1855-1863
[4]   The National Bowel Cancer Audit Project: what do trusts think of the National Bowel Cancer Audit and how can it be improved? [J].
Cornish, J. A. ;
Tilney, H. S. ;
Tan, E. ;
Thompson, M. R. ;
Smith, J. J. ;
Tekkis, P. P. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2011, 15 (01) :53-59
[5]   Audit, guidelines and standards: Clinical governance for hip fracture care in Scotland [J].
Currie, CT ;
Hutchison, JD .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 27 (18-19) :1099-1105
[6]   Evidence-based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: Using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians' blood transfusion behaviour [J].
Francis, Jill J. ;
Stockton, Charlotte ;
Eccles, Martin P. ;
Johnston, Marie ;
Cuthbertson, Brian H. ;
Grimshaw, Jeremy M. ;
Hyde, Chris ;
Tinmouth, Alan ;
Stanworth, Simon J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 14 :625-646
[7]   Three approaches to qualitative content analysis [J].
Hsieh, HF ;
Shannon, SE .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (09) :1277-1288
[8]   Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit [J].
Johnston, G ;
Crombie, IK ;
Davies, HTO ;
Alder, EM ;
Millard, A .
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 9 (01) :23-36
[9]   The Dutch Audit of Carotid Interventions: Transparency in Quality of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients in the Netherlands [J].
Karthaus, Eleonora G. ;
Vahl, Anco ;
Kuhrij, Laurien S. ;
Elsman, Bernard H. P. ;
Geelkerken, Robert H. ;
Wouters, Michel W. J. M. ;
Hamming, Jaap F. ;
de Borst, Gert J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 56 (04) :476-485
[10]   The Best Practice Tariff helps improve management of neck of femur fractures: a completed audit loop [J].
Khan, S. K. ;
Weusten, A. ;
Bonczek, S. ;
Tate, A. ;
Port, A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2013, 74 (11) :644-647