Exploring differences in the use of the statin choice decision aid and diabetes medication choice decision aid in primary care

被引:16
作者
Ballard, Aimee Yu [1 ]
Kessler, Maya [1 ]
Scheitel, Marianne [2 ]
Montori, Victor M. [3 ,4 ]
Chaudhry, Rajeev [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Primary Care Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Knowledge Delivery Ctr, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Knowledge & Evaluat Res Unit, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Div Endocrinol, Dept Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
来源
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING | 2017年 / 17卷
关键词
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; UPDATE; MELLITUS; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-017-0514-5
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Shared decision making is essential to patient centered care, but can be difficult for busy clinicians to implement into practice. Tools have been developed to aid in shared decision making and embedded in electronic medical records (EMRs) to facilitate use. This study was undertaken to explore the patterns of use and barriers and facilitators to use of two decision aids, the Statin Choice Decision Aid (SCDA) and the Diabetes Medication Choice Decision Aid (DMCDA), in primary care practices where the decision aids are embedded in the EMR. Methods: A survey exploring factors that influenced use of each decision aid was sent to eligible primary care clinicians affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Survey data was collected and clinician use of each decision aid via links from the EMR was tracked. Results: The survey response rate was 40% (105/262). Log file data indicated 51% of clinicians used the SCDA and 9% of clinicians used the DMCDA. Reasons for lack of use included lack of knowledge of the EMR link, not finding the decision aids helpful, and time constraints. Survey responses indicated that use of the tool as intended was low, with many clinicians only discussing decision aid topics that they found relevant. Conclusion: Although guidelines for both the treatment of blood cholesterol with a statin and for the treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes recommend shared decision making, tools that facilitate shared decision making are not routinely used even when embedded in the EMR. Even when decision aids are used, their use may not reflect patient centered care.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   SPOTLIGHT: PATIENT CENTRED CARE Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens [J].
Agoritsas, Thomas ;
Heen, Anja Fog ;
Brandt, Linn ;
Alonso-Coello, Pablo ;
Kristiansen, Annette ;
Akl, Elie A. ;
Neumann, Ignacio ;
Tikkinen, Kari A. O. ;
van der Weijden, Trudy ;
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Montori, Victor M. ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. ;
Vandvik, Per Olav .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, REP BRIEF CROSS QUAL
[3]   Shared decision making for patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial in primary care [J].
Branda, Megan E. ;
LeBlanc, Annie ;
Shah, Nilay D. ;
Tiedje, Kristina ;
Ruud, Kari ;
Van Houten, Holly ;
Pencille, Laurie ;
Kurland, Marge ;
Yawn, Barbara ;
Montori, Victor M. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
[4]   The design of a decision aid about diabetes medications for use during the consultation with patients with type 2 diabetes [J].
Breslin, Maggie ;
Mlillan, Rebecca J. ;
Montori, Victor M. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2008, 73 (03) :465-472
[5]   Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument [J].
Couet, Nicolas ;
Desroches, Sophie ;
Robitaille, Hubert ;
Vaillancourt, Hugues ;
Leblanc, Annie ;
Turcotte, Stephane ;
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Legare, France .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (04) :542-561
[6]   Training health professionals in shared decision making: Update of an international environmental scan [J].
Diouf, Ndeye Thiab ;
Menear, Matthew ;
Robitaille, Hubert ;
Guerard, Genevieve Painchaud ;
Legare, France .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2016, 99 (11) :1753-1758
[7]   Shared decision making in the United States: policy and implementation activity on multiple fronts [J].
Frosch, Dominick L. ;
Moulton, Benjamin W. ;
Wexler, Richard M. ;
Holmes-Rovner, Margaret ;
Volk, Robert J. ;
Levin, Carrie A. .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2011, 105 (04) :305-312
[8]   Uptake and Documentation of the Use of an Encounter Decision Aid in Usual Practice: A Retrospective Analysis of the Use of the Statin/Aspirin Choice Decision Aid [J].
Inselman, Jonathan ;
Branda, Megan ;
Castaneda-Guarderas, Ana ;
Gionfriddo, Michael R. ;
Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia L. ;
Morris, Megan M. ;
Shah, Nilay D. ;
Montori, Victor M. ;
LeBlanc, Annie .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2016, 36 (04) :557-561
[9]   Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2015: A Patient-Centered Approach Update to a Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes [J].
Inzucchi, Silvio E. ;
Bergenstal, Richard M. ;
Buse, John B. ;
Diamant, Michaela ;
Ferrannini, Ele ;
Nauck, Michael ;
Peters, Anne L. ;
Tsapas, Apostolos ;
Wender, Richard ;
Matthews, David R. .
DIABETES CARE, 2015, 38 (01) :140-149
[10]   Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme [J].
Joseph-Williams, Natalie ;
Lloyd, Amy ;
Edwards, Adrian ;
Stobbart, Lynne ;
Tomson, David ;
Macphail, Sheila ;
Dodd, Carole ;
Brain, Kate ;
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Thomson, Richard .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 357 :j1744