Development and evaluation of correction models for a low-cost fine particulate matter monitor

被引:10
|
作者
Nilson, Brayden [1 ,2 ]
Jackson, Peter L. [1 ]
Schiller, Corinne L. [1 ,2 ]
Parsons, Matthew T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Northern British Columbia, Dept Geog Earth & Environm Sci, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9, Canada
[2] Environm & Climate Change Canada, Air Qual Sci West, Meteorol Serv Canada, Vancouver, BC V6C 3S5, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
PERFORMANCE; AMBIENT; PM2.5; PURPLEAIR; SENSORS;
D O I
10.5194/amt-15-3315-2022
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Four correction models with differing forms were developed on a training dataset of 32 PurpleAir-Federal Equivalent Method (FEM) hourly fine particulate matter (PM2.5) observation colocation sites across North America (NA). These were evaluated in comparison with four existing models from external sources using the data from 15 additional NA colocation sites. Colocation sites were determined automatically based on proximity and a novel quality control process. The Canadian Air Quality Health Index Plus (AQHI+) system was used to make comparisons across the range of concentrations common to NA, as well as to provide operational and health-related context to the evaluations. The model found to perform the best was our Model 2, PM2.5-corrected = PM2.5-cf-1/( 1 +/- 0.24/ (100/RH% - 1)), where RH is limited to the range [30 %, 70 gc], which is based on the RH growth model developed by Crilley et al. (2018). Corrected concentrations from this model in the moderate to high range, the range most impactful to human health, outperformed all other models in most comparisons. Model 7 (Barkjohn et al., 2021) was a close runner-up and excelled in the low-concentration range (most common to NA). The correction models do not perform the same at different locations, and thus we recommend testing several models at nearby colocation sites and utilizing that which performs best if possible. If no nearby colocation site is available, we recommend using our Model 2. This study provides a robust framework for the evaluation of low-cost PM2.5 sensor correction models and presents an optimized correction model for North American PurpleAir (PA) sensors.
引用
收藏
页码:3315 / 3328
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance Evaluation of Low-cost Particulate Matter Sensors
    Marinov, Marin B.
    Hensel, Stefan
    Ganev, Borislav
    Nikolov, Georgi
    2017 XXVI INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ELECTRONICS (ET), 2017,
  • [2] Evaluation methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors
    Bean, Jeffrey K.
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2021, 14 (11) : 7369 - 7379
  • [3] Development and evaluation of a low-cost aerosol generator for experimental inhalation exposure to particulate matter
    Curbani, F.
    Mendes, R. M. A.
    dos Santos, J. G.
    Olivieri, D. N.
    Tadokoro, C. E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 20 (11) : 12267 - 12284
  • [4] Ambient and laboratory evaluation of a low-cost particulate matter sensor
    Kelly, K. E.
    Whitaker, J.
    Petty, A.
    Widmer, C.
    Dybwad, A.
    Sleeth, D.
    Martin, R.
    Butterfield, A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2017, 221 : 491 - 500
  • [5] Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Beijing
    Mei, Han
    Han, Pengfei
    Wang, Yinan
    Zeng, Ning
    Liu, Di
    Cai, Qixiang
    Deng, Zhaoze
    Wang, Yinghong
    Pan, Yuepeng
    Tang, Xiao
    SENSORS, 2020, 20 (16) : 1 - 17
  • [6] Development and evaluation of a low-cost aerosol generator for experimental inhalation exposure to particulate matter
    F. Curbani
    R. M. A. Mendes
    J. G. dos Santos
    D. N. Olivieri
    C. E. Tadokoro
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2023, 20 : 12267 - 12284
  • [7] A low-cost monitor for simultaneous measurement of fine particulate matter and aerosol optical depth - Part 1: Specifications and testing
    Wendt, Eric A.
    Quinn, Casey W.
    Miller-Lionberg, Daniel D.
    Tryner, Jessica
    L'Orange, Christian
    Ford, Bonne
    Yalin, Azer P.
    Pierce, Jeffrey R.
    Jathar, Shantanu
    Volckens, John
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2019, 12 (10) : 5431 - 5441
  • [8] A low-cost particulate matter (PM2.5) monitor for wildland fire smoke
    Kelleher, Scott
    Quinn, Casey
    Miller-Lionberg, Daniel
    Volckens, John
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2018, 11 (02) : 1087 - 1097
  • [9] Evaluation of Low-Cost Particulate Matter (PM) Sensors: A Preliminary Investigation
    Qian, Defeng
    Pang, Zhihong
    O'Neill, Zheng
    2018 ASHRAE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2018,
  • [10] Laboratory and field evaluation of three low-cost particulate matter sensors
    Ghamari, Mohammad
    Soltanpur, Cinna
    Rangel, Pablo
    Groves, William A.
    Kecojevic, Vladislav
    IET WIRELESS SENSOR SYSTEMS, 2022, 12 (01) : 21 - 32