Reported barriers to the implementation of person-centred planning for people with intellectual disabilities in the UK

被引:30
作者
Robertson, Janet [1 ]
Hatton, Chris
Emerson, Eric
Elliott, Johan
McIntosh, Barbara
Swift, Paul
Krinjen-Kemp, Emma
Towers, Christine
Romeo, Renee
Knapp, Martin
Sanderson, Helen
Routledge, Martin
Oakes, Peter
Joyce, Theresa
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Inst Hlth Res, Lancaster LA1 4YW, England
[2] Fdn People Learning Disabilities, London, England
[3] Inst Psychiat, Ctr Econ Mental Hlth, London SE5, England
[4] Helen Sanderson Associates, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Valuing People Support Team, Dept Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] Univ Hull, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
[7] S London & Maudsley NHS Trust & Kings Coll London, Estia Ctr, London, England
关键词
barriers; intellectual disabilities; person-centred planning;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-3148.2006.00333.x
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Background Research in the US and UK has demonstrated the effectiveness of person-centred planning (PCP) for people with intellectual disabilities. However, it is important to acknowledge problems that arise when implementing PCP. This paper considers barriers to PCP reported during a longitudinal study of the impact of PCP. Methods Person-centred planning was introduced over a 2-year period for 93 people of whom 65 had a plan developed. Information was collected regarding barriers to PCP every 3 months from key informants using self-completion questionnaires. Results Barriers to PCP were widespread particularly in relation to: availability of trained facilitators; availability of services; lack of time and reluctance of people other than paid support staff to engage in the PCP process. Conclusions Services need to be aware of potential barriers to PCP so that strategies can be developed to overcome them, the first of which should be the ongoing training and support of facilitators.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 307
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, IND WELL BEING CHOIC
[2]  
BLISS V, 1999, N W AUDIT SUPPORTED
[3]  
Cabinet Office, 2005, IMPR LIF CHANC DIS P
[4]  
Coyle K., 1999, J. Vocat. Rehabil, V12, P175
[5]  
*DEP HLTH DEP ED S, 2004, NAT SERV FRAM CHILDR
[6]  
Department of Health, 2001, VAL PEOPL NEW STRAT
[7]  
DUMAS S, 2002, PERSON CTR PLANNING, P223
[8]  
Emerson E, 2000, AM J MENT RETARD, V105, P81, DOI 10.1352/0895-8017(2000)105<0081:QACOCR>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]  
Emerson E, 2001, AM J MENT RETARD, V106, P401, DOI 10.1352/0895-8017(2001)106<0401:QACOSL>2.0.CO