Winter wheat production using conventional, conservation and no-till system

被引:0
|
作者
Kosutic, S [1 ]
Zimmer, R [1 ]
Filipovic, D [1 ]
Kovacev, I [1 ]
Husnjak, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Agron Fak Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
关键词
soil tillage; conventional conservation and no-till; winter wheat; Slavonia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The paper presents one year experiment results in. winter wheat production with three different soil tillage systems carried out in Slavonia, at fields of agricultural enterprise Hana Nasice d.o.o, location Lila. Test crop was winter wheat, variety Renan. Tillage systems were: conventional, conservation and no-till. Energy requirement comparison showed extraordinary, expensiveness of conventional tillage with specific consumption of 39.38 kg ha(-1) and 6.07 kg t(-1) of diesel fuel. Conservation tillage I (B) system required 34.06 kg ha(-1) and 5.53 kg t(-1), which is 13.5 % less. Conservation tillage II (C) required 10.86 kg ha(-1) and 1.60 kg t(-1) which is 72.4 % less energy per hectare and 73.6 less energy per ton. The most energy saving soil tillage system is no-till with fuel consumption of only 5.50 kg ha(-1) and 0.81 kg t(-1) of diesel fuel or 86.7 % less than conventional system. Soil tillage systems comparison regarding labour requirement unveiled that conventional tillage (A) required 2.01 h ha(-1) and 0.32 h t(-1) while conservation tillage 1 (B) required 1.54 h ha(-1) and 0.25 h t(-1) or 23.83 % and 21.87 % less labour requirement than conventional tillage system respectively. Conservation tillage II (C) required 0.43 h ha(-1) and 0.06 t(-1) (r or 78.61 % and 81.25 % less labour requirement. No-till required only 0.43 h ha(-1) and 0.06 h t(-1) which is 78.61 % and 81.25 % less than conventional tillage system. No-till system enabled saving of 115,40 E ha(-1). The lowest yield of 6.16 t ha(-1) achieved conservation tillage I (B), while the highest yield of 6.82 t ha(-1) achieved conservation tillage II (C).
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 476
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Crop production and soil water management in conservation agriculture, no-till, and conventional tillage systems in Malawi
    TerAvest, Dan
    Carpenter-Boggs, Lynne
    Thierfelder, Christian
    Reganold, John P.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 212 : 285 - 296
  • [22] Deficit irrigation for sugarbeet under conventional and no-till production
    Nilahyane, Abdelaziz
    Chen, Chengci
    Afshar, Reza Keshavarz
    Sutradhar, Apurba
    Stevens, William Bart
    Iversen, William
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 3 (01)
  • [23] Comparison of conventional soil tillage, reduced tillage and no-till system in maize production
    Zimmer, R
    Kosutic, S
    Jurisic, M
    Duvnjak, V
    ACTUAL TASKS ON AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 32 : 427 - 433
  • [24] Adaptability of Wheat Cultivars to a Late-Planted No-Till Fallow Production System
    Higginbotham, Ryan W.
    Jones, Stephen S.
    Carter, Arron H.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (08) : 1224 - 1233
  • [25] NO-TILL GRAIN-SORGHUM PRODUCTION FOLLOWING WHEAT
    VIATOR, HP
    MARSHALL, JG
    LOUISIANA AGRICULTURE, 1981, 25 (01): : 16 - 17
  • [26] Weed management in no-till winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
    Calado, Jose M. G.
    Basch, Gottlieb
    de Carvalho, Mario
    CROP PROTECTION, 2010, 29 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [27] Evaluation of incorporated phosphorus fertilizer recommendations on no-till managed winter wheat
    Reed, Vaughn
    Watkins, Patrick
    Souza, Joao
    Arnall, Brian
    CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT, 2021, 7 (02)
  • [28] A COMPARISON OF BROADCAST AND DRILL METHODS FOR NO-TILL SEEDING WINTER-WHEAT
    COLLINS, BA
    FOWLER, DB
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1992, 72 (04) : 1001 - 1008
  • [29] Genotype-environment interaction of no-till winter wheat in Western Canada
    Domitruk, DR
    Duggan, BL
    Fowler, DB
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2001, 81 (01) : 7 - 16
  • [30] Optimizing nitrogen application timing in no-till soft red winter wheat
    Weisz, R
    Crozier, CR
    Heiniger, RW
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2001, 93 (02) : 435 - 442