Promotion of self-regulated learning in classrooms: investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance

被引:177
作者
Kistner, Saskia [1 ]
Rakoczy, Katrin [2 ]
Otto, Barbara [1 ]
Dignath-van Ewijk, Charlotte [3 ]
Buettner, Gerhard [1 ]
Klieme, Eckhard [2 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Psychol, D-60325 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] German Inst Int Educ Res DIPF, D-60486 Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Univ Groningen, Dept Educ Sci, NL-9712 TG Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Self-regulated learning; Learning environment; Video observation; Instructional effectiveness; Classroom research; METACOGNITION; METAANALYSIS; STRATEGIES; COMPONENTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11409-010-9055-3
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
An implication of the current research on self-regulation is to implement the promotion of self-regulated learning in schools. Teachers can promote self-regulated learning either directly by teaching learning strategies or indirectly by arranging a learning environment that enables students to practise self-regulation. This study investigates teachers' direct and indirect promotion of self-regulated learning and its relation to the development of students' performance. Twenty German mathematics teachers with their overall 538 students (grade 9) were videotaped for a three-lesson unit on the Pythagorean Theorem. Students' mathematics performance was tested several times before and after the observed lessons. A low-inferent coding system was applied to assess the teachers' implicit or explicit instruction of cognitive strategies (e.g., organisation), metacognitive strategies (e.g., planning), and motivational strategies (e.g., resource management). High-inferent ratings were used to assess features of the learning environment that foster self-regulation. Results reveal that a great amount of strategy teaching takes place in an implicit way, whereas explicit strategy teaching and supportive learning environment are rare. The instruction of organisation strategies and some features of the learning environment (constructivism, transfer) relate positively to students' performance development. In contrast to implicit strategy instruction, explicit strategy instruction was associated with a gain in performance. These results reveal a discrepancy between the usefulness of explicit strategy instruction and its rare occurrence in classrooms.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 171
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], DOKUMENTATION ERHEBU
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, Methodology, DOI [10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86, DOI 10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86, 10.1027/1614-1881.1.3.86, DOI 10.1027/1614-1881.1.3.86]
  • [3] Artelt C., 2000, Strategisches Lernen
  • [4] Boekaerts M., 1999, INT J EDUC RES, V31, P445, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2, 10.1016/s0883-0355(99)00014-2]
  • [5] Self-regulated Learning at the Junction of Cognition and Motivation
    Boekaerts, Monique
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1996, 1 (02) : 100 - 112
  • [6] Brown A. L., 1981, Educational Researcher, V10, P14, DOI DOI 10.3102/0013189X010002014
  • [7] Collins Allan, 1991, American Educator, V6, P38, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10833-009-9107-0
  • [8] The CLIA-model: A framework for designing powerful learning environments for thinking and problem solving
    De Corte, E
    Verschaffel, L
    Masui, C
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2004, 19 (04) : 365 - 384
  • [9] Can offline metacognition enhance mathematical problem solving?
    Desoete, A
    Roeyers, H
    De Clercq, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 95 (01) : 188 - 200
  • [10] DIGNATH CC, 2010, ASSESSING TEAC UNPUB