Intraoperative peripheral frozen sections do not significantly affect prognosis after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

被引:29
|
作者
Gillitzer, Rolf [1 ]
Thueroff, Carolin [1 ]
Fandel, Thomas [1 ]
Thomas, Christian [1 ]
Thueroff, Joachim W. [1 ]
Brenner, Walburgis [1 ]
Wiesner, Christoph [1 ]
Jones, Jon [1 ]
Hansen, Torsten [2 ]
Hampel, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Pathol, Univ Med Ctr, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
关键词
frozen sections; prostate cancer; prostate neoplasms; prostate-specific antigen; retropubic prostatectomy; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; ORGAN-CONFINED DISEASE; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; SPECIMENS; IMPACT; PROGRESSION; BIOPSIES; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09591.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? We hypothesized that taking intraoperative frozen section (FS) biopsies of the peripheral margins of resection during radical prostatectomy would allow an intraoperative systematic scan of resection margins. In the case of positive FS, extended resection could be performed with the aim of completely excising residual tumour, improving biochemical recurrence-free survival of patients with positive surgical margins at the inked specimen. To our knowledge, the prognostic value of achieving a negative resection status by systematically taking intraoperative FS of the peripheral margins of resection during radical prostatectomy has not been established to date. OBJECTIVE center dot To determine the value of systematic intraoperative peripheral frozen sections (FS) with or without extended resection during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prediction of biochemical recurrence (BCR) compared with inked surgical margins. PATIENTS AND METHODS center dot Between 1999 and 2003, in a prospective study, multiple peripheral FS (median 14; range 5-20) were taken from the urethral stump, circumferentially from the bladder neck, and from the lateral pedicles in 200 consecutive bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomies for clinically localized prostate cancer by a single surgeon. center dot Patients with stage pT3b or more and/or positive lymph nodes were excluded. center dot Of the 188 patients, 178 (94.7%) were followed over a median of 82 months (62-124). center dot BCR, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >= 0.2 ng/mL, was related to status of both, inked specimen margins and FS. RESULTS center dot Of all 188 prostatectomy specimens, 49 (26.1%) had positive surgical margins (PSM); these were found posterolaterally in 15 (30.6%), apically in 13 (26.5%), basally in 10 (20.4%) and at multiple sites in 11 (22.4%) specimens. center dot Intraoperative peripheral FS were positive in 19 (10.7%) patients, including 6.2% at urethral stump, 3.3% at lateral pedicles and 1.1% at bladder neck. center dot In organ-confined disease, BCR-free survival was 93.3% (111/119) for patients with negative surgical margins (NSM) and 72% (18/25) for patients with PSM (inked specimen), but negative peripheral FS (P < 0.001). center dot Five- and 10-year BCR-free survival for NSM was 94.9% and 92.8%, for PSM with negative peripheral FS it was 75.3% and 70.6%, and for PSM with positive peripheral FS it was 62.5% and 62.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS center dot Frozen section biopsies of peripheral resection margins during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy are not reliable in predicting PSM. center dot Intraoperative achievement of a locally disease-free status, as monitored by negative circumferential intraoperative FS of peripheral margins, is not associated with a statistically significant BCR-free survival benefit compared with patients with negative surgical margins on the prostatectomy specimen. center dot Based on these findings, we do not recommend a routine of systematically taking intraoperative FS biopsies during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 759
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical impact of intraoperative frozen sections during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
    Heinrich, Elmar
    Schoen, Georg
    Schiefelbein, Frank
    Michel, Maurice Stephan
    Trojan, Lutz
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 28 (06) : 709 - 713
  • [2] Intraoperative assessment and reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens to guide nerve-sparing surgery in prostate cancer patients (NeuroSAFE)
    van der Slot, Margaretha A.
    den Bakker, Michael A.
    Klaver, Sjoerd
    Kliffen, Mike
    Busstra, Martijn B.
    Rietbergen, John B. W.
    Gan, Melanie
    Hamoen, Karen E.
    Budel, Leo M.
    Goemaere, Natascha N. T.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Helleman, Jozien
    Roobol, Monique J.
    van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 77 (04) : 539 - 547
  • [3] Fascia surrounding the prostate: clinical and anatomical basis of the nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
    Cornu, Jean-Nicolas
    Phe, Veronique
    Fournier, Georges
    Delmas, Vincent
    Sebe, Philippe
    SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2010, 32 (07): : 663 - 667
  • [4] Evaluatoion of intraoperative histology during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
    Kotov, S. V.
    Byadretdinov, I. S.
    Guspanov, R. I.
    Pulbere, S. A.
    Yusufov, A. G.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2023, 19 (04): : 52 - 60
  • [5] Intraoperative frozen section monitoring of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Cangiano, TG
    Litwin, MS
    Naitoh, J
    Dorey, F
    deKernion, JB
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (03) : 655 - 658
  • [6] Evaluation of Oncological Outcomes and Data Quality in Studies Assessing Nerve-sparing Versus Non-Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy in Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Moris, Lisa
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Vilaseca, Antoni
    Van den Broeck, Thomas
    Briers, Erik
    De Santis, Maria
    Gillessen, Silke
    Grivas, Nikos
    O'Hanlon, Shane
    Henry, Ann
    Lam, Thomas B.
    Lardas, Michael
    Mason, Malcolm
    Oprea-Lager, Daniela
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    van der Poel, Henk
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Willemse, Peter-Paul
    Yuan, Cathy Y.
    Grummet, Jeremy P.
    Tilki, Derya
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Cornford, Philip
    Mottet, Nicolas
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (03): : 690 - 700
  • [7] NERVE-SPARING RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER - THE PROS AND CONS
    ZIMMERN, PE
    LEACH, GE
    CANCER, 1995, 75 (07) : 1944 - 1948
  • [8] Can prostate biopsies predict suitability for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy?
    Connolly, SS
    O'Malley, KJ
    O'Brien, A
    Kelly, DG
    Mulvin, DW
    Quinlan, DM
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2004, 38 (03): : 216 - 220
  • [9] Safe-R: a novel score, accounting for oncological safe nerve-sparing at radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer
    Becker, Andreas
    Coelius, Carolina
    Adam, Meike
    Tennstedt, Pierre
    Kluth, Luis
    Steuber, Thomas
    Heinzer, Hans
    Graefen, Markus
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    Michl, Uwe
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 33 (01) : 77 - 83
  • [10] Erectile Function Recovery After Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: Is Back to Baseline Status Enough for Patient Satisfaction?
    Rossi, Martina Sofia
    Moschini, Marco
    Bianchi, Marco
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Fossati, Nicola
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    Farina, Elena
    Picozzi, Marta
    Salonia, Andrea
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2016, 13 (04) : 669 - 678