Primary immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and antithymocyte globulin for kidney transplant recipients of a suboptimal graft

被引:37
|
作者
Grinyo, JM
Gil-Vernet, S
Seron, D
Hueso, M
Fulladosa, X
Cruzado, JM
Moreso, F
Fernandez, A
Torras, J
Riera, L
Castelao, AM
Alsina, J
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, CSUB, Bellvitge Hosp, Dept Nephrol,Serv Nefrol, Barcelona 08907, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, CSUB, Bellvitge Hosp, Dept Urol, Barcelona 08907, Spain
关键词
antithymocyte globulin; mycophenolate mofetil; suboptimal grafts;
D O I
10.1093/ndt/13.10.2601
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background, In renal transplantation the beneficial immunosuppressive effects of cyclosporin (CsA) may be curtailed by its nephrotoxicity, specially in patients receiving a cadaveric allograft from suboptimal donors or at risk of delayed graft function. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) have each demonstrated to be potent immunosuppressants in renal transplantation. In a prospective analysis we have studied the results at 6 months of the combination of MMF, ATG and low-dose steroids in patients with low immunological risk receiving a first cadaveric renal allograft from a suboptimal donor or at risk of delayed graft function. Methods. Patients with preformed reactive antibodies < 50% receiving a first graft from a suboptimal donor (age greater than or equal to 40 years, non-heart-beating, acute renal failure, arterial hypertension) or at risk of delayed graft function (cold ischaemia time greater than or equal to 24 h) were eligible for this open single-arm pilot trial. From September 1996 to March 1997 we recruited 17 patients. They were treated with MMF 2 g p.o, preoperatively, and after transplantation at 3 g/day; rabbit ATG i.v. at 2 mg/kg preoperatively, and 1.5 mg/kg/day the first day after transplantation, followed by four doses of 1 mg/kg on alternate days; prednisone was given at 0.25 mg/kg/day and reduced progressively to 0.1 mg/kg/day at 3 months. Primary outcomes were incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, delayed graft function, opportunistic infections, graft and patient survival, and the need for introduction of CsA treatment. Results. delayed graft function occurred in two cases (12%). Four of 17 patients (24%) had a biopsy-proven acute rejection (2 grade I and 2 grade II) within the first 3 months after transplantation. CsA was added in two cases with grade II biopsy-proven acute rejection, and in one with grade I biopsy-proven acute rejection. In one patient MMF was replaced by CsA because of gastrointestinal intolerance. Mean serum creatinine 6 months after transplantation was 159+/-59 mu mol/l. Cytomegalovirus tissue invasive disease occurred in one patient (6%). At 6 months followup all patients are alive with functioning allografts. Conclusions. These preliminary results suggest that in low-immunological-risk patients who receive a suboptimal renal allograft or at risk of delayed graft function, the combination of MMF, ATG, and steroids is an efficient immunosuppressive regime that may avoid the use of CsA in 70% of the recipients.
引用
收藏
页码:2601 / 2604
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Mycophenolate mofetil and C-reactive protein in renal transplant recipients
    Wong, Brian M.
    Huang, Michael
    Zaltzman, Jeffrey S.
    Prasad, G. V. Ramesh
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 83 (01) : 48 - 53
  • [43] Mycophenolate mofetil vs. sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen
    Sampaio, Edison L.
    Pinheiro-Machado, Paula G.
    Garcia, Riberto
    Felipe, Claudia R.
    Park, Sung I.
    Casarini, Dulce E.
    Moreira, Silvia
    Franco, Marcello F.
    Tedesco-Silva, Helio, Jr.
    Medina-Pestana, Jose O.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 22 (02) : 141 - 149
  • [44] Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction in Heart Transplant Recipients at High Risk for Rejection
    Kitto, Brent
    Thai, Steven
    Baetz, Brooke
    Patel, Hamang M.
    Mandras, Stacy A.
    Desai, Sapna
    Krim, Selim R.
    OCHSNER JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (02) : 133 - 138
  • [45] Pharmacokinetics and Immunodynamics of Basiliximab in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients on Mycophenolate Mofetil Comedication
    Hoecker, Britta
    Kovarik, John M.
    Daniel, Volker
    Opelz, Gerhard
    Fehrenbach, Henry
    Holder, Martin
    Hoppe, Bernd
    Hoyer, Peter
    Jungraithmayr, Therese C.
    Koepf-Shakib, Sabine
    Laube, Guido F.
    Mueller-Wiefel, Dirk E.
    Offner, Gisela
    Plank, Christian
    Schroeder, Monika
    Weber, Lutz T.
    Zimmerhackl, Lothar B.
    Toenshoff, Burkhard
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 86 (09) : 1234 - 1240
  • [46] Conversion to mycophenolate mofetil for modulating recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients
    Kornberg, A.
    Kuepper, B.
    Wilberg, J.
    Tannapfel, A.
    Thrum, K.
    Baerthel, E.
    Hommann, M.
    Settmacher, U.
    TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2007, 9 (04) : 295 - 301
  • [47] Mycophenolate Mofetil Hepatotoxicity Associated With Mitochondrial Abnormality in Liver Transplant Recipients and Mice
    Warren, Mikako
    Mitsinikos, Tania
    Yanni, George
    Sasaki, Mika
    Sasaki, Atsuo T.
    Thomas, Dan
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2021, 73 (04) : 463 - 470
  • [48] The impact of omeprazole on mycophenolate pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients
    AbdElhalim, Mohamed S.
    Kenawy, Ahmed S.
    El Demellawy, Heba H.
    Azouz, Amany A.
    Alghanem, Sarah S.
    Al-Otaibi, Torki
    Gheith, Osama
    Abd ElMonem, Mohamed
    Afifi, Mohammed K.
    Hussein, Raghda R. S.
    KIDNEY RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 39 (04) : 479 - 486
  • [49] Does Mycophenolate Mofetil Decrease the Recurrent Acute Rejection in Renal Transplant Recipients
    Aneesh Srivastava
    Vishwajeet Singh
    Devendra Kumar
    Anant Kumar
    R K Sharma
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2005, 37 : 615 - 619
  • [50] Mycophenolate mofetil in pediatric heart transplant recipients: A single-center experience
    Dipchand, AI
    Benson, L
    McCrindle, BW
    Coles, J
    West, L
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 5 (02) : 112 - 118