Economic and Environmental Criteria and Trade-Offs for Recovery Processes

被引:12
作者
Sharma, Shivom [1 ]
Chua, Y. C. [1 ]
Rangaiah, G. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Singapore 117576, Singapore
关键词
Economic indicators; Environmental indicators; Multiobjective optimization; Solvent recovery; Volatile organic component; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; VOC RECOVERY; SELECTION; ALTERNATIVES; UNCERTAINTY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1080/10426914.2010.544816
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Volatile organic component (VOC) and solvent recovery processes are two industrially important processes to limit the release of potentially harmful components into the environment. The extent of environmental contamination depends on the recovery system used for the harmful components, which indirectly contributes to the cost of process. Recently, VOC and solvent recovery systems have been optimized for multiple economic and environmental criteria such as profit before tax (PBT), net present worth (NPW), and potential environmental impact (PEI). Besides PEI, there are other aggregate environmental indicators such as IMPact Assessment of Chemical Toxics 2002+ (IMPACT), green degree (GD), and inherent environmental toxicity hazard (IETH). In this study, we consider the optimization of VOC and solvent recovery processes for PBT, NPW, PEI, IETH, GD, and IMPACT as well as their individual components as simultaneous objectives, to explore the trade-offs among them. The two processes are simulated using a commercial simulator, and then optimized using the elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithm in a spreadsheet along with an interface to the simulator. From the results, it can be concluded that optimization of aggregated IMPACT indicator is similar to optimization of its individual end-point damage categories. In the case of other environmental indicators, optimization for individual categories may be necessary to explore trade-offs among them.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 445
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], OPTIMIZATION FOOD EN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, MULTI OBJECTIVE OPTI
[3]   The application of life cycle assessment to process optimisation [J].
Azapagic, A ;
Clift, R .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 23 (10) :1509-1526
[4]  
Cave SR, 1997, COMPUT CHEM ENG, V21, pS965, DOI 10.1016/S0098-1354(97)00174-9
[5]   Plant-wide waste management. 1. Synthesis and multiobjective design [J].
Chakraborty, A ;
Linninger, AA .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2002, 41 (18) :4591-4604
[6]   Automating hierarchical environmentaffy-conscious design using integrated software: VOC recovery case study [J].
Chen, H ;
Rogers, TN ;
Barna, BA ;
Shonnard, DR .
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS, 2003, 22 (03) :147-160
[7]  
Crowl D. A., 2001, Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications
[8]   Evaluation of waste minimization alternatives under uncertainty: a multiobjective optimization approach [J].
Dantus, MM ;
High, KA .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 23 (10) :1493-1508
[9]   An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms [J].
Deb, K .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2000, 186 (2-4) :311-338
[10]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197