Clinical evaluation of the Er:YAG laser in combination with an enamel matrix protein derivative for the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects:: a pilot study

被引:27
|
作者
Schwarz, F
Sculean, A
Georg, T
Becker, J
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, W Deutsch Kieferklin, Dept Oral Surg, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Periodontol & Operat Dent, D-6500 Mainz, Germany
[3] Univ Saarland, Inst Med Biometr Epidemiol & Med Informat, D-6650 Homburg, Germany
关键词
clinical trial; enamel proteins; intrabony defects; lasers/therapeutic use; periodontal regeneration;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00412.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare the combination therapy of deep intrabony periodontal defects using an Er:YAG laser (ERL) and enamel matrix protein derivative (EMD) to scaling and root planing+ ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)+EMD. Material and Methods: Twenty-two patients with chronic periodontitis, each of whom displayed 1 intrabony defect, were randomly treated with access flap surgery and defect debridement with an Er:YAG (160 mJ/pulse, 10 Hz) plus EMD (test) or with access flap surgery followed by scaling and root planing (SRP) with hand instruments plus EDTA and EMD (control). The following clinical parameters were recorded at baseline and at 6 months: plaque index, gingival index, bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), gingival recession, and clinical attachment level (CAL). No differences in any of the investigated parameters were observed at baseline between the two groups. Results: Healing was uneventful in all patients. At 6 months after therapy, the sites treated with ERL and EMD showed a reduction in mean PD from 8.6+/-1.2 mm to 4.6+/-0.8 mm and a change in mean CAL from 10.7+/-1.3 mm to 7.5+/-1.4 mm (p<0.001). In the group treated with SRP+EDTA+EMD, the mean PD was reduced from 8.1+/-0.8 mm to 4.0+/-0.5 mm and the mean CAL changed from 10.4+/-1.1 mm to 7.1+/-1.2 mm (p<0.001). No statistically significant differences in any of the investigated parameters were observed between the test and control group. Conclusion: Within the limits of the present study, it may be concluded that both therapies led to short-term improvements of the investigated clinical parameters, and the combination of ERL and EMD does not seem to improve the clinical outcome of the therapy additionally compared to SRP+EDTA+EMD.
引用
收藏
页码:975 / 981
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects Using Enamel Matrix Derivative: Surgical Reentry After an Observation Period of at Least 5 Years
    Iorio-Siciliano, Vincenzo
    Blasi, Andrea
    Nuzzolo, Paolo
    Matarasso, Marco
    Isola, Gaetano
    Ramaglia, Luca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 39 (04) : 537 - 543
  • [42] Clinical and radiographic findings following application of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of intrabony defects - A series of case reports
    Parashis, A
    Tsiklakis, K
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2000, 27 (09) : 705 - 713
  • [43] Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Intrabony Periodontal Defects Treated with Hyaluronic Acid or Enamel Matrix Proteins: A 6-Month Prospective Study
    Velaa, Octavia-Carolina
    Boariub, Marius
    Rusuc, Darian
    lorio-Sicilianod, Vincenzo
    Sculeane, Anton
    Stratulf, Stefan-loan
    ORAL HEALTH & PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY, 2024, 22 (01) : 257 - 270
  • [44] Effect of EDTA root conditioning on the healing of intrabony defects treated with an enamel matrix protein derivative
    Sculean, Anton
    Berakdar, Mohammad
    Willershausen, Britta
    Arweiler, Nicole B.
    Becker, Juergen
    Schwarz, Frank
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2006, 77 (07) : 1167 - 1172
  • [45] Treatment of Intrabony Defects Using Guided Tissue Regeneration or Enamel Matrix Derivative: A 3-Year Prospective Randomized Clinical Study
    Crea, Alessandro
    Dassatti, Leonardo
    Hoffmann, Oliver
    Zafiropoulos, Gregory-George
    Deli, Giorgio
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2008, 79 (12) : 2281 - 2289
  • [46] Four-year results following treatment of intrabony periodontal defects with an enamel matrix derivative alone or combined with a biphasic calcium phosphate
    Malgorzata Pietruska
    Jan Pietruski
    Katalin Nagy
    Michel Brecx
    Nicole Birgit Arweiler
    Anton Sculean
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2012, 16 : 1191 - 1197
  • [47] THE USE OF ONLY ENAMEL MATRIX DERIVATIVE ALLOWS OUTSTANDING REGENERATION RESULTS IN PERIODONTAL INTRABONY DEFECT TREATMENT: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Bertoldi, C.
    Ferrari, M.
    Giannetti, L.
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS AND HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 2019, 33 (02): : 633 - 636
  • [48] Four-year results following treatment of intrabony periodontal defects with an enamel matrix derivative alone or combined with a biphasic calcium phosphate
    Pietruska, Malgorzata
    Pietruski, Jan
    Nagy, Katalin
    Brecx, Michel
    Arweiler, Nicole Birgit
    Sculean, Anton
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2012, 16 (04) : 1191 - 1197
  • [49] Enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of partially contained intrabony defects: 12-month results
    Corbella, S.
    Alberti, A.
    Calciolari, E.
    Taschieri, S.
    Francetti, L.
    AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2019, 64 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [50] Enamel matrix derivative as an adjunct to minimally invasive non-surgical treatment of intrabony defects: A randomized clinical trial
    Anoixiadou, Styliani
    Parashis, Andreas
    Vouros, Ioannis
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2022, 49 (02) : 134 - 143