Recurrent stroke secondary to late patent foramen ovale-closure device thrombus: a case report

被引:1
|
作者
Jerzyna, Lennox [1 ]
Prashar, Abhisheik [2 ,3 ]
Youssef, George [2 ,3 ]
Sader, Mark [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wollongong Hosp, Div Med, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia
[2] St George Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Sydney, NSW 2217, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
Thrombus; Patent foramen ovale; PFO closure device; Stroke; Myelofibrosis; Case report; AMPLATZER PFO OCCLUDER; ATRIAL SEPTAL-DEFECT; PERCUTANEOUS CLOSURE; PARADOXICAL EMBOLISM; MEDICAL THERAPY; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1093/ehjcr/ytab313
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure has been well established in the secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke with overall low rates of procedural complications. One such complication is PFO closure device thrombus formation which is now rarely reported with newer generation devices. Case summary We present the unusual case of a 59-year-old woman with myelofibrosis who developed late-onset recurrent embolic strokes related to Amplatzer PFO closure device thrombus whilst therapeutically anticoagulated on Warfarin. Surgical management was deemed too high risk and our patient was conservatively managed with enoxaparin. Serial transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated a reduction in thrombus size and the patient had no further neurological events. Discussion Overall, the risk of serious complications following percutaneous PFO closure, such as device-associated thrombus, remains low. The risk of thrombus formation in patients with hypercoagulable states is not well characterized. Despite good evidence for the efficacy in preventing recurrent cryptogenic stroke, the role of PFO closure in addition to anticoagulation is unclear. Given this uncertain benefit of PFO closure in anticoagulated patients and the unclear risk profile, patient selection, and thorough pre-procedural evaluation are vital when assessing the appropriateness of percutaneous PFO closure.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patent Foramen Ovale Stroke and Device Closure
    Suradi, Hussam S.
    Hijazi, Ziyad M.
    CARDIOLOGY CLINICS, 2016, 34 (02) : 231 - +
  • [2] Patent foramen ovale closure for secondary stroke prevention
    Alkhouli, Mohamad
    Sievert, Horst
    Holmes, David R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 (28) : 2339 - +
  • [3] Patent foramen ovale closure for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke
    Kolte, Dhaval
    Palacios, Igor F.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2021, 19 (03) : 211 - 220
  • [4] Thrombus straddling a patent foramen ovale and pulmonary embolism: A case report
    Huang, Yi-Xiong
    Chen, Yu
    Cao, Yi
    Qiu, Yi-Gang
    Zheng, Jian-Yong
    Li, Tian-Chang
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2020, 8 (20) : 4902 - 4907
  • [5] Recurrent Stroke due to Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Device Thrombus Eight Years after Implantation
    Kodankandath, Thomas V.
    Mishra, Sanskriti
    Libman, Richard B.
    Wright, Paul
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2016, 25 (09) : E161 - E162
  • [6] Patent Foramen Ovale Closure for Stroke Prevention and Other Disorders
    Collado, Fareed Moses S.
    Poulin, Marie-France
    Murphy, Joshua J.
    Jneid, Hani
    Kavinsky, Clifford J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2018, 7 (12):
  • [7] Stroke due to late device thrombosis following successful percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure
    Korabathina, Ravikiran
    Thaler, David E.
    Kimmelstiel, Carey
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 80 (03) : 498 - 502
  • [8] Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Stroke and Beyond
    Randhawa, Sandeep
    Mehta, Jawahar L.
    Dhar, Gaurav
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2024, 20 (03) : 77 - 86
  • [9] Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure After Stroke
    Lee, Oh-Hyun
    Kim, Jung-Sun
    KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2022, 52 (11) : 801 - 807
  • [10] Recurrent Events After Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale
    Wallenborn, Julia
    Bertog, Stefan C.
    Franke, Jennifer
    Steinberg, Daniel H.
    Majunke, Nicolas
    Wilson, Neil
    Wunderlich, Nina
    Sievert, Horst
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 82 (04) : 541 - 546