BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutational profile and prevalence in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) probands from Southern Brazil: Are international testing criteria appropriate for this specific population?

被引:34
作者
Alemar, Baarbara [1 ,2 ]
Gregorio, Cleandra [1 ,2 ]
Herzog, Josef [3 ]
Bittar, Camila Matzenbacher [1 ,2 ]
Oliveira Netto, Cristina Brinckmann [4 ]
Artigalas, Osvaldo [5 ]
Schwartz, Ida Vanessa D. [4 ,6 ]
Coffa, Jordy [7 ]
Camey, Suzi Alves [8 ]
Weitzel, Jeffrey [3 ]
Ashton-Prolla, Patricia [1 ,2 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Programa Posgrad Genet & Biol Mol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Hosp Clin Porto Alegre, Lab Med Genom, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Div Clin Canc Genom, Dept Populat Sci, Duarte, CA USA
[4] Hosp Clin Porto Alegre, Serv Genet Med, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[5] Hosp Moinhos Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[6] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Genet, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[7] MRC Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Estat, Programa Posgrad Epidemiol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
GERMLINE MUTATIONS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; GUIDELINES; STATEMENT; VARIANTS; GENETICS; GENOMICS; SOCIETY; GENES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0187630
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) are the main cause of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC). Methods In this study we evaluated the mutational profile and prevalence of BRCA pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants among probands fulfilling the NCCN HBOC testing criteria. We characterized the clinical profile of these individuals and explored the performance of international testing criteria. Results A pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant was detected in 19.1% of 418 probands, including seven novel frameshift variants. Variants of uncertain significance were found in 5.7% of individuals. We evaluated 50 testing criteria and mutation probability algorithms. There was a significant odds-ratio (OR) for mutation prediction (p <= 0.05) for 25 criteria; 14 of these had p <= 0.001. Using a cutoff point of four criteria, the sensitivity is 83.8%, and the specificity is 53.5% for being a carrier. The prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants for each criterion ranged from 22.1% to 55.6%, and criteria with the highest ORs were those related to triple-negative breast cancer or ovarian cancer. Conclusions This is the largest study of comprehensive BRCA testing among Brazilians to date, and the first to analyze clinical criteria for genetic testing. Several criteria that are not included in the NCCN achieved a higher predictive value. Identification of the most informative criteria for each population will assist in the development of a rational approach to genetic testing, and will enable the prioritization of high-risk individuals as a first step towards offering testing in low-income countries.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Prevalence of Hispanic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients from Brazil reveals differences among Latin American populations [J].
Alemar, Barbara ;
Herzog, Josef ;
Oliveira Netto, Cristina Brinckmann ;
Artigalas, Osvaldo ;
Schwartz, Ida Vanessa D. ;
Bittar, Camila Matzenbacher ;
Ashton-Prolla, Patricia ;
Weitzel, Jeffrey N. .
CANCER GENETICS, 2016, 209 (09) :417-422
[2]   A global reference for human genetic variation [J].
Altshuler, David M. ;
Durbin, Richard M. ;
Abecasis, Goncalo R. ;
Bentley, David R. ;
Chakravarti, Aravinda ;
Clark, Andrew G. ;
Donnelly, Peter ;
Eichler, Evan E. ;
Flicek, Paul ;
Gabriel, Stacey B. ;
Gibbs, Richard A. ;
Green, Eric D. ;
Hurles, Matthew E. ;
Knoppers, Bartha M. ;
Korbel, Jan O. ;
Lander, Eric S. ;
Lee, Charles ;
Lehrach, Hans ;
Mardis, Elaine R. ;
Marth, Gabor T. ;
McVean, Gil A. ;
Nickerson, Deborah A. ;
Wang, Jun ;
Wilson, Richard K. ;
Boerwinkle, Eric ;
Doddapaneni, Harsha ;
Han, Yi ;
Korchina, Viktoriya ;
Kovar, Christie ;
Lee, Sandra ;
Muzny, Donna ;
Reid, Jeffrey G. ;
Zhu, Yiming ;
Chang, Yuqi ;
Feng, Qiang ;
Fang, Xiaodong ;
Guo, Xiaosen ;
Jian, Min ;
Jiang, Hui ;
Jin, Xin ;
Lan, Tianming ;
Li, Guoqing ;
Li, Jingxiang ;
Li, Yingrui ;
Liu, Shengmao ;
Liu, Xiao ;
Lu, Yao ;
Ma, Xuedi ;
Tang, Meifang ;
Wang, Bo .
NATURE, 2015, 526 (7571) :68-+
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PROTOCOL 2 BRCA1 BRC
[4]   Genomic analysis in the clinic: benefits and challenges for health care professionals and patients in Brazil [J].
Ashton-Prolla P. ;
Goldim J.R. ;
Vairo F.P. ;
da Silveira Matte U. ;
Sequeiros J. .
Journal of Community Genetics, 2015, 6 (3) :275-283
[5]   Mutation detection rates associated with specific selection criteria for BRCA1/2 testing in 1854 high-risk families: A monocentric Italian study [J].
Azzollini, Jacopo ;
Scuvera, Giulietta ;
Bruno, Eleonora ;
Pasanisi, Patrizia ;
Zaffaroni, Daniela ;
Calvello, Mariarosaria ;
Pasini, Barbara ;
Ripamonti, Carla B. ;
Colombo, Mara ;
Pensotti, Valeria ;
Radice, Paolo ;
Peissel, Bernard ;
Manoukian, Siranoush .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 32 :65-71
[6]   PredictSNP: Robust and Accurate Consensus Classifier for Prediction of Disease-Related Mutations [J].
Bendl, Jaroslav ;
Stourac, Jan ;
Salanda, Ondrej ;
Pavelka, Antonin ;
Wieben, Eric D. ;
Zendulka, Jaroslav ;
Brezovsky, Jan ;
Damborsky, Jiri .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2014, 10 (01)
[7]   Comprehensive Analysis of BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 Germline Mutation and Tumor Characterization: A Portrait of Early-Onset Breast Cancer in Brazil [J].
Carraro, Dirce Maria ;
Azevedo Koike Folgueira, Maria Aparecida ;
Garcia Lisboa, Bianca Cristina ;
Ribeiro Olivieri, Eloisa Helena ;
Vitorino Krepischi, Ana Cristina ;
de Carvalho, Alex Fiorini ;
de Carvalho Mota, Louise Danielle ;
Puga, Renato David ;
Maciel, Maria do Socorro ;
Depieri Michelli, Rodrigo Augusto ;
de Lyra, Eduardo Carneiro ;
Giorgi Grosso, Stana Helena ;
Soares, Fernando Augusto ;
de Souza Waddington Achatz, Maria Isabel Alves ;
Brentani, Helena ;
Moreira-Filho, Carlos Alberto ;
Brentani, Maria Mitzi .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (03)
[8]  
Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, 2017, GEN FAM HIGH RISK AS
[9]  
Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, 2014, GEN FAM HIGH RISK AS
[10]   A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO [J].
Evans, DGR ;
Eccles, DM ;
Rahman, N ;
Young, K ;
Bulman, M ;
Amir, E ;
Shenton, A ;
Howell, A ;
Lalloo, F .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2004, 41 (06) :474-480