BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutational profile and prevalence in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) probands from Southern Brazil: Are international testing criteria appropriate for this specific population?

被引:34
作者
Alemar, Baarbara [1 ,2 ]
Gregorio, Cleandra [1 ,2 ]
Herzog, Josef [3 ]
Bittar, Camila Matzenbacher [1 ,2 ]
Oliveira Netto, Cristina Brinckmann [4 ]
Artigalas, Osvaldo [5 ]
Schwartz, Ida Vanessa D. [4 ,6 ]
Coffa, Jordy [7 ]
Camey, Suzi Alves [8 ]
Weitzel, Jeffrey [3 ]
Ashton-Prolla, Patricia [1 ,2 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Programa Posgrad Genet & Biol Mol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Hosp Clin Porto Alegre, Lab Med Genom, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Div Clin Canc Genom, Dept Populat Sci, Duarte, CA USA
[4] Hosp Clin Porto Alegre, Serv Genet Med, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[5] Hosp Moinhos Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[6] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Genet, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[7] MRC Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Estat, Programa Posgrad Epidemiol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 11期
关键词
GERMLINE MUTATIONS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; GUIDELINES; STATEMENT; VARIANTS; GENETICS; GENOMICS; SOCIETY; GENES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0187630
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) are the main cause of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC). Methods In this study we evaluated the mutational profile and prevalence of BRCA pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants among probands fulfilling the NCCN HBOC testing criteria. We characterized the clinical profile of these individuals and explored the performance of international testing criteria. Results A pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant was detected in 19.1% of 418 probands, including seven novel frameshift variants. Variants of uncertain significance were found in 5.7% of individuals. We evaluated 50 testing criteria and mutation probability algorithms. There was a significant odds-ratio (OR) for mutation prediction (p <= 0.05) for 25 criteria; 14 of these had p <= 0.001. Using a cutoff point of four criteria, the sensitivity is 83.8%, and the specificity is 53.5% for being a carrier. The prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants for each criterion ranged from 22.1% to 55.6%, and criteria with the highest ORs were those related to triple-negative breast cancer or ovarian cancer. Conclusions This is the largest study of comprehensive BRCA testing among Brazilians to date, and the first to analyze clinical criteria for genetic testing. Several criteria that are not included in the NCCN achieved a higher predictive value. Identification of the most informative criteria for each population will assist in the development of a rational approach to genetic testing, and will enable the prioritization of high-risk individuals as a first step towards offering testing in low-income countries.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Prevalence of Hispanic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients from Brazil reveals differences among Latin American populations
    Alemar, Barbara
    Herzog, Josef
    Oliveira Netto, Cristina Brinckmann
    Artigalas, Osvaldo
    Schwartz, Ida Vanessa D.
    Bittar, Camila Matzenbacher
    Ashton-Prolla, Patricia
    Weitzel, Jeffrey N.
    [J]. CANCER GENETICS, 2016, 209 (09) : 417 - 422
  • [2] A global reference for human genetic variation
    Altshuler, David M.
    Durbin, Richard M.
    Abecasis, Goncalo R.
    Bentley, David R.
    Chakravarti, Aravinda
    Clark, Andrew G.
    Donnelly, Peter
    Eichler, Evan E.
    Flicek, Paul
    Gabriel, Stacey B.
    Gibbs, Richard A.
    Green, Eric D.
    Hurles, Matthew E.
    Knoppers, Bartha M.
    Korbel, Jan O.
    Lander, Eric S.
    Lee, Charles
    Lehrach, Hans
    Mardis, Elaine R.
    Marth, Gabor T.
    McVean, Gil A.
    Nickerson, Deborah A.
    Wang, Jun
    Wilson, Richard K.
    Boerwinkle, Eric
    Doddapaneni, Harsha
    Han, Yi
    Korchina, Viktoriya
    Kovar, Christie
    Lee, Sandra
    Muzny, Donna
    Reid, Jeffrey G.
    Zhu, Yiming
    Chang, Yuqi
    Feng, Qiang
    Fang, Xiaodong
    Guo, Xiaosen
    Jian, Min
    Jiang, Hui
    Jin, Xin
    Lan, Tianming
    Li, Guoqing
    Li, Jingxiang
    Li, Yingrui
    Liu, Shengmao
    Liu, Xiao
    Lu, Yao
    Ma, Xuedi
    Tang, Meifang
    Wang, Bo
    [J]. NATURE, 2015, 526 (7571) : 68 - +
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, PROTOCOL 2 BRCA1 BRC
  • [4] Genomic analysis in the clinic: benefits and challenges for health care professionals and patients in Brazil
    Ashton-Prolla P.
    Goldim J.R.
    Vairo F.P.
    da Silveira Matte U.
    Sequeiros J.
    [J]. Journal of Community Genetics, 2015, 6 (3) : 275 - 283
  • [5] Mutation detection rates associated with specific selection criteria for BRCA1/2 testing in 1854 high-risk families: A monocentric Italian study
    Azzollini, Jacopo
    Scuvera, Giulietta
    Bruno, Eleonora
    Pasanisi, Patrizia
    Zaffaroni, Daniela
    Calvello, Mariarosaria
    Pasini, Barbara
    Ripamonti, Carla B.
    Colombo, Mara
    Pensotti, Valeria
    Radice, Paolo
    Peissel, Bernard
    Manoukian, Siranoush
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 32 : 65 - 71
  • [6] PredictSNP: Robust and Accurate Consensus Classifier for Prediction of Disease-Related Mutations
    Bendl, Jaroslav
    Stourac, Jan
    Salanda, Ondrej
    Pavelka, Antonin
    Wieben, Eric D.
    Zendulka, Jaroslav
    Brezovsky, Jan
    Damborsky, Jiri
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2014, 10 (01)
  • [7] Comprehensive Analysis of BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 Germline Mutation and Tumor Characterization: A Portrait of Early-Onset Breast Cancer in Brazil
    Carraro, Dirce Maria
    Azevedo Koike Folgueira, Maria Aparecida
    Garcia Lisboa, Bianca Cristina
    Ribeiro Olivieri, Eloisa Helena
    Vitorino Krepischi, Ana Cristina
    de Carvalho, Alex Fiorini
    de Carvalho Mota, Louise Danielle
    Puga, Renato David
    Maciel, Maria do Socorro
    Depieri Michelli, Rodrigo Augusto
    de Lyra, Eduardo Carneiro
    Giorgi Grosso, Stana Helena
    Soares, Fernando Augusto
    de Souza Waddington Achatz, Maria Isabel Alves
    Brentani, Helena
    Moreira-Filho, Carlos Alberto
    Brentani, Maria Mitzi
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (03):
  • [8] Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, 2017, GEN FAM HIGH RISK AS
  • [9] Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, 2014, GEN FAM HIGH RISK AS
  • [10] A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO
    Evans, DGR
    Eccles, DM
    Rahman, N
    Young, K
    Bulman, M
    Amir, E
    Shenton, A
    Howell, A
    Lalloo, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2004, 41 (06) : 474 - 480