Role of information in preparing men for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a qualitative study embedded in the ProtecT trial

被引:14
|
作者
Wade, Julia [1 ]
Rosario, Derek J. [2 ]
Howson, Joanne [3 ]
Avery, Kerry N. L. [1 ]
Salter, C. Elizabeth [1 ]
Goodwin, M. Louise [2 ]
Blazeby, Jane M. [1 ]
Lane, J. Athene [1 ]
Metcalfe, Chris [1 ]
Neal, David E. [4 ]
Hamdy, Freddie C. [5 ]
Donovan, Jenny L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Acad Urol Unit, Sheffield S10 2JF, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Protect Study Urol Res, Sheffield S10 2JF, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Addenbrookes Hosp, Ctr Oncol, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[5] Univ Oxford, John Radcliffe Hosp, Nuffield Dept Surg Sci, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
来源
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
Biopsy; Cancer; Patient information; Prostate; Qualitative methods; CANCER; MORTALITY; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-015-0729-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The histological diagnosis of prostate cancer requires a prostate needle biopsy. Little is known about the relationship between information provided to prepare men for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (TRUS- Bx) and how men experience biopsy. The objectives were a) to understand men's experiences of biopsy as compared to their expectations; and b) to propose current evidence-based information for men undergoing TRUS-Bx. Methods: Between February 2006 and May 2008, 1,147 men undergoing a standardised 10-core transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy protocol under antibiotic cover following a PSA 3.0-19.9 ng/ml in the Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) trial, completed questionnaires about biopsy symptoms. In this embedded qualitative study, in-depth interviews were undertaken with 85 men (mean age 63.6 yrs, mean PSA 4.5 ng/ml) to explore men's experiences of prostate biopsy and how the experience might be improved. Interview data were analysed thematically using qualitative research methods. Findings from the qualitative study were used to guide selection of key findings from the questionnaire study in developing a patient information leaflet preparing men for biopsy. Results: Although most men tolerated TRUS-Bx, a quarter reported problematic side-effects and anxiety. Side effects were perceived as problematic and anxiety arose most commonly when experiences deviated from information provided. Men who were unprepared for elements of TRUS-Bx procedure or its sequelae responded by contacting health professionals for reassurance and voiced frustration that pre-biopsy information had understated the possible severity or duration of pain/discomfort and bleeding. Findings from questionnaire and interview data were combined to propose a comprehensive, evidence-based patient information leaflet for TRUS-Bx. Conclusions: Men reported anxiety associated with TRUS-Bx or its side-effects most commonly if they felt inadequately prepared for the procedure. Data from this qualitative study and the previous questionnaire study have been used to propose an updated, comprehensive evidence-based set of information for men undergoing TRUS-Bx.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental Impact of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Thiel, Cassandra L.
    Gordon, Ilyssa O.
    Nolte, Adam C.
    Perecman, Aaron
    Loeb, Stacy
    Overcash, Michael
    Sherman, Jodi D.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 (05) : 463 - 471
  • [32] Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Transrectal Extended Prostate Biopsy in Patients Receiving Low-Dose Aspirin
    Kariotis, Ioannis
    Philippou, Prodromos
    Volanis, Demetrios
    Serafetinides, Efraim
    Delakas, Demetrios
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2010, 36 (03): : 308 - 314
  • [33] Operator is an Independent Predictor of Detecting Prostate Cancer at Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Toi, Ants
    Lockwood, Gina A.
    Evans, Andrew
    Finelli, Antonio
    O'Malley, Martin
    Margolis, Myles
    Ghai, Sangeet
    Fleshner, Neil E.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06) : 2659 - 2663
  • [34] Risks and complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy:: A prospective study and review of the literature
    Rodríguez, LV
    Terris, MK
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (06) : 2115 - 2120
  • [35] Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: current approach
    Akduman, Bulent
    Crawford, E. David
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 36 (01): : 25 - 32
  • [36] The clinical utility of transperineal template-guided saturation prostate biopsy for risk stratification after transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy
    Song, Wan
    Kang, Minyong
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2019, 60 (06) : 454 - 462
  • [37] Safety of 12 core transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in patients on aspirin
    Vasudeva, Pawan
    Kumar, Niraj
    Kumar, Anup
    Singh, Harbinder
    Kumar, Gaurav
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2015, 41 (06): : 1096 - 1100
  • [38] Complications of Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Impact of Prebiopsy Enema
    Kam, Sung Chul
    Choi, See Min
    Yoon, Sol
    Choi, Jae Hui
    Lee, Seong Hyun
    Hwa, Jeong Seok
    Chung, Ky Hyun
    Hyun, Jae Seog
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 55 (11) : 732 - 736
  • [39] A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of topical glyceryl trinitrate for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
    Rochester, MA
    Le Monnier, K
    Brewster, SF
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (02) : 418 - 420
  • [40] Evaluation of targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective cohort trial
    Zembower, Teresa R.
    Maxwell, Kelly M.
    Nadler, Robert B.
    Cashy, John
    Scheetz, Marc H.
    Qi, Chao
    Schaeffer, Anthony J.
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 17