Use of Economic Evaluation in Decision Making Evidence and Recommendations for Improvement

被引:5
|
作者
Simoens, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Res Ctr Pharmaceut Care & Pharmacoecon, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL-EXCELLENCE; PHARMACEUTICAL CARE; NATIONAL-INSTITUTE; TASK-FORCE; INFORMATION; EUROPE; GROWTH; NICE;
D O I
10.2165/11538120-000000000-00000
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Information about the value for money of a medicine as derived from an economic evaluation can be used for decision-making purposes by policy makers, healthcare payers, healthcare professionals and pharmaceutical companies. This article illustrates the use of economic evaluation by decision makers and formulates a number of recommendations to enhance the use of such evaluations for decision-making purposes. Over the last decades, there has been a substantial increase in the number of economic evaluations assessing the value for money of medicines. Economic evaluation is used by policy makers and healthcare payers to inform medicine pricing/reimbursement decisions in more and more countries. It is a suitable tool to evaluate medicines and to present information about their value for money to decision makers in a familiar format. In order to fully exploit the use of economic evaluation for decision-making purposes, researchers need to take care to conduct such economic evaluations according to methodologically sound principles. Additionally, researchers need to take into account the decision-making context. They need to identify the various objectives that decision makers pursue and discuss how decision makers can use study findings to attain these objectives. These issues require further attention from researchers, policy makers, healthcare payers, healthcare professionals and pharmaceutical companies with a view to optimizing the use of economic evaluation in decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:1917 / 1926
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Applying an Implementation Framework to the Use of Evidence from Economic Evaluations in Making Healthcare Decisions
    Merlo, Gregory
    Page, Katie
    Zardo, Pauline
    Graves, Nicholas
    APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2019, 17 (04) : 533 - 543
  • [33] Bridging the Gap: Exploring the Barriers to Using Economic Evidence in Healthcare Decision Making and Strategies for Improving Uptake
    Merlo, Gregory
    Page, Katie
    Ratcliffe, Julie
    Halton, Kate
    Graves, Nicholas
    APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2015, 13 (03) : 303 - 309
  • [34] Economic aspects and evidence-based decision making in evaluating patients with suspected small bowel disorders
    Gerson, Lauren B.
    TECHNIQUES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 14 (02) : 123 - 128
  • [35] Quality of Evidence and Legal Decision-Making
    Jose Ganuza, Juan
    Gomez, Fernando
    Penalva, Jose
    AMERICAN LAW AND ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2022, 24 (01) : 327 - 368
  • [36] Improving Juror Assessments of Forensic Testimony and Its Effects on Decision-Making and Evidence Evaluation
    LaBat, Devon E.
    Goldfarb, Deborah
    Evans, Jacqueline R.
    Compo, Nadja Schreiber
    Koolmees, Cassidy J.
    LaPorte, Gerald
    Lothridge, Kevin
    LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2023, 47 (05) : 566 - 578
  • [37] The role of health economic analyses in vaccine decision making
    Black, Steven
    VACCINE, 2013, 31 (51) : 6046 - 6049
  • [38] Recommendations for Preoperative Assessment and Shared Decision-Making in Cardiac Surgery
    Mihalj, Maks
    Carrel, Thierry
    Urman, Richard D.
    Stueber, Frank
    Luedi, Markus M.
    CURRENT ANESTHESIOLOGY REPORTS, 2020, 10 (02) : 185 - 195
  • [39] Recent evidence of economic evaluation of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology
    Ruamviboonsuk, Paisan
    Ruamviboonsuk, Varis
    Tiwari, Richa
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 34 (05) : 449 - 458
  • [40] PREDICTORS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS OF CANCER DRUGS IN DECISION MAKING: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    Wang, Y.
    Qiu, T.
    Nikodem, M.
    Francois, C.
    Toumi, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S511 - S512