Water Ecosystem Services Footprint of agricultural production in Central Italy

被引:11
作者
Pacetti, Tommaso [1 ]
Castelli, Giulio [2 ]
Schroeder, Boris [3 ,4 ]
Bresci, Elena [2 ]
Caporali, Enrica [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Firenze, Dept Civil & Environm Engn DICEA, Florence, Italy
[2] Univ Firenze, Dept Agr Food Environm & Forestry DAGRI, Florence, Italy
[3] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Geoecol, Landscape Ecol & Environm Syst Anal, Langer Kamp 19c, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
[4] Berlin Brandenburg Inst Adv Biodivers Res BBIB, Konigin Luise Str 2-4, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Integrated water resources management; Ecosystem services; Water Footprint; SWAT; Arno river; SUPPLY-AND-DEMAND; RIVER; MODEL; NATIONS; BLUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149095
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The appropriate implementation of the concept of Water-related Ecosystem Services (WES) in water resources planning can support the development of productive activities and, at the same time, sustain local ecosystems. However, such implementation it is only possible when both WES supply and demand are evaluated, eventually with a spatially explicit method, for gaining insights into the ecohydrological behavior of a basin and the anthropogenic pressures on the available water resources. Based on the integration of hydrological modelling and Water Footprint (WF) analysis, this study aims at developing a methodology to analyze both the supply and demand of WES, evaluating a Water Ecosystem Services Footprint (WESF) associated with the agricultural sector. The proposed methodology is based on a 3-tiered approach: 1) evaluating the WES demand determined by the agricultural sector using the WF Assessment methodology; 2) quantifying the WES supply by applying the Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT); 3) estimating the green, blue, and gray WESF through dedicated indicators in order to identify the main hotspots. The methodology is applied to a specific case study in the upstream part of the Arno river basin (Central Italy). By means of subnational WF statistics the green, blue, and gray WF of the agricultural sector is calculated, determining the spatial distribution of WES demand in the catchment. SWAT results quantify the available water resources, pointing out the blue/green surface water partitioning, where precipitation is divided into 25% runoff and 46% evapotranspiration, and the associated WES supply. Merging the results, the WESF spatial pattern is evaluated, properly identifying the most critical areas in the catchment. WESF represents an operative tool to look at agricultural water management from an ecosystem-based perspective, supporting the identification of the strategies to explore the sustainable coupling of biosphere and anthroposphere. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Agricultural water-saving potentials with water footprint benchmarking under different tillage practices for crop production in an irrigation district
    Gao, Jie
    Zhuo, La
    Duan, Ximing
    Wu, Pute
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2023, 282
  • [32] Does agricultural intensification cause tipping points in ecosystem services?
    Watson, Stephen C. L.
    Newton, Adrian C.
    Ridding, Lucy E.
    Evans, Paul M.
    Brand, Steven
    McCracken, Morag
    Gosal, Arjan S.
    Bullock, James M.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2021, 36 (12) : 3473 - 3491
  • [33] Managing forest ecosystem services for hydropower production
    Vogl, Adrian L.
    Dennedy-Frank, P. James
    Wolny, Stacie
    Johnson, Justin A.
    Hamel, Perrine
    Narain, Urvashi
    Vaidya, Anil
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2016, 61 : 221 - 229
  • [34] Managing agricultural water-energy-food-environment nexus considering water footprint and carbon footprint under uncertainty
    Yue, Qiong
    Guo, Ping
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2021, 252
  • [35] Tradeoffs between agricultural production and ecosystem services: A case study in Zhangye, Northwest China
    Li, Zhihui
    Deng, Xiangzheng
    Jin, Gui
    Mohmmed, Alnail
    Arowolo, Aisha Olushola
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 707
  • [36] Production pathways for profitability and valuing ecosystem services for willow coppice in intensive agricultural applications
    Livingstone, David
    Smyth, Beatrice M.
    Sherry, Erin
    Murray, Simon T.
    Foley, Aoife M.
    Lyons, Gary A.
    Johnston, Christopher R.
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 36 : 281 - 291
  • [37] Economies of Scope in the Agricultural Provision of Ecosystem Services: An Application to a High Cost Production Region
    Huber, Robert
    Lehmann, Bernard
    GERMAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 59 (02): : 91 - 105
  • [38] A Comprehensive Approach to Assess the Impact of Agricultural Production Factors on Selected Ecosystem Services in Poland
    Bojar, Waldemar
    Zarski, Wojciech
    Kusmierek-Tomaszewska, Renata
    Zarski, Jacek
    Baranowski, Piotr
    Krzyszczak, Jaromir
    Lamorski, Krzysztof
    Slawinski, Cezary
    Mattas, Konstadinos
    Staboulis, Christos
    Natos, Dimitrios
    Koc, Ahmet Ali
    Bayaner, Ahmet
    Ojeda Roldan, Alvaro
    Parra Rivero, Obdulia
    RESOURCES-BASEL, 2023, 12 (09):
  • [39] Impact of climate change scenarios on crop yield and water footprint of maize in the Po valley of Italy
    Bocchiola, D.
    Nana, E.
    Soncini, A.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2013, 116 : 50 - 61
  • [40] An assessment of ecosystem services: Water flow regulation and hydroelectric power production
    Guo, ZW
    Xiao, XM
    Li, DM
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2000, 10 (03) : 925 - 936