Water Ecosystem Services Footprint of agricultural production in Central Italy

被引:11
作者
Pacetti, Tommaso [1 ]
Castelli, Giulio [2 ]
Schroeder, Boris [3 ,4 ]
Bresci, Elena [2 ]
Caporali, Enrica [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Firenze, Dept Civil & Environm Engn DICEA, Florence, Italy
[2] Univ Firenze, Dept Agr Food Environm & Forestry DAGRI, Florence, Italy
[3] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Geoecol, Landscape Ecol & Environm Syst Anal, Langer Kamp 19c, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
[4] Berlin Brandenburg Inst Adv Biodivers Res BBIB, Konigin Luise Str 2-4, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Integrated water resources management; Ecosystem services; Water Footprint; SWAT; Arno river; SUPPLY-AND-DEMAND; RIVER; MODEL; NATIONS; BLUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149095
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The appropriate implementation of the concept of Water-related Ecosystem Services (WES) in water resources planning can support the development of productive activities and, at the same time, sustain local ecosystems. However, such implementation it is only possible when both WES supply and demand are evaluated, eventually with a spatially explicit method, for gaining insights into the ecohydrological behavior of a basin and the anthropogenic pressures on the available water resources. Based on the integration of hydrological modelling and Water Footprint (WF) analysis, this study aims at developing a methodology to analyze both the supply and demand of WES, evaluating a Water Ecosystem Services Footprint (WESF) associated with the agricultural sector. The proposed methodology is based on a 3-tiered approach: 1) evaluating the WES demand determined by the agricultural sector using the WF Assessment methodology; 2) quantifying the WES supply by applying the Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT); 3) estimating the green, blue, and gray WESF through dedicated indicators in order to identify the main hotspots. The methodology is applied to a specific case study in the upstream part of the Arno river basin (Central Italy). By means of subnational WF statistics the green, blue, and gray WF of the agricultural sector is calculated, determining the spatial distribution of WES demand in the catchment. SWAT results quantify the available water resources, pointing out the blue/green surface water partitioning, where precipitation is divided into 25% runoff and 46% evapotranspiration, and the associated WES supply. Merging the results, the WESF spatial pattern is evaluated, properly identifying the most critical areas in the catchment. WESF represents an operative tool to look at agricultural water management from an ecosystem-based perspective, supporting the identification of the strategies to explore the sustainable coupling of biosphere and anthroposphere. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of water footprint of production: A case study for Diyarbakir province
    Muratoglu, Abdullah
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2020, 35 (02): : 845 - 858
  • [22] An innovative approach to combine solar photovoltaic gardens with agricultural production and ecosystem services
    Semeraro, Teodoro
    Scarano, Aurelia
    Santino, Angelo
    Emmanuel, Rohinton
    Lenucci, Marcello
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 56
  • [23] Do provisioning ecosystem services change along gradients of increasing agricultural production?
    Ronju Ahammad
    Stephanie A. Tomscha
    Sarah E. Gergel
    Frédéric Baudron
    Jean-Yves Duriaux-Chavarría
    Samson Foli
    Davidson Gumbo
    Dominic Rowland
    Josh van Vianen
    Terry C. H. Sunderland
    Landscape Ecology, 2024, 39
  • [24] Modeling trade-offs among ecosystem services in agricultural production systems
    Balbi, Stefano
    del Prado, Agustin
    Gallejones, Patricia
    Geevan, Chandanathil Pappachan
    Pardo, Guillermo
    Perez-Minana, Elena
    Manrique, Rosa
    Hernandez-Santiago, Cuitlahuac
    Villa, Ferdinando
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2015, 72 : 314 - 326
  • [25] Impact of Social Factors in Agricultural Production on the Crop Water Footprint in Xinjiang, China
    Zhang, Pei
    Deng, Xiaoya
    Long, Aihua
    Hai, Yang
    Li, Yang
    Wang, Hao
    Xu, Hailiang
    WATER, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [26] Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services
    Gordon, Line J.
    Finlayson, C. Max
    Falkenmark, Malin
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2010, 97 (04) : 512 - 519
  • [27] Do provisioning ecosystem services change along gradients of increasing agricultural production?
    Ahammad, Ronju
    Tomscha, Stephanie A.
    Gergel, Sarah E.
    Baudron, Frederic
    Duriaux-Chavarria, Jean-Yves
    Foli, Samson
    Gumbo, Davidson
    Rowland, Dominic
    van Vianen, Josh
    Sunderland, Terry C. H.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2024, 39 (01)
  • [28] Ecosystem services and Australian agricultural enterprises
    Sandhu, Harpinder S.
    Crossman, Neville D.
    Smith, F. Patrick
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 74 : 19 - 26
  • [29] Assessing water scarcity in agricultural production system based on the generalized water resources and water footprint framework
    Cao Xinchun
    Wu Mengyang
    Guo Xiangping
    Zheng Yalian
    Gong Yan
    Wu Nan
    Wang Weiguang
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 609 : 587 - 597
  • [30] The Impact of Cattle Grazing on Recreational Ecosystem Services in a Park Area: a Gray Water Footprint Assessment
    Allocca, V.
    Marzano, E.
    Tramontano, M.
    Celico, F.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 10 (03) : 269 - 278