Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals

被引:55
作者
Rowland, Christopher A. [1 ]
DeLosh, Edward L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Psychol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
Retrieval practice; Retention interval; Testing effect; Episodic memory; Delay; ELABORATIVE RETRIEVAL; TESTS; STRENGTH; RECALL;
D O I
10.1080/09658211.2014.889710
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The testing effect refers to the retention benefit conferred by prior retrieval of information from memory. Although the testing effect is a robust phenomenon, a common assumption is that reliable memory benefits only emerge after long retention intervals of days or weeks. The present study focused on potential test-induced retention benefits for brief retention intervals on the order of minutes and tens of seconds. Participants in four experiments studied lists of words. Some of the items were subjected to an initial cued recall test, and others were re-presented for additional study. Free recall tests were administered in each experiment following retention intervals ranging from 30 s to 8 min. When initial retrieval practice was successful (Experiments 1 through 3), or feedback compensated for unsuccessful retrieval (Experiment 4), significant testing effects emerged at all retention intervals. Results are discussed in the context of a bifurcated item-distribution model and highlight the importance of initial test performance and the type of analysis employed when examining testing effect data.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 419
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Covert Retrieval Practice Benefits Retention as Much as Overt Retrieval Practice
    Smith, Megan A.
    Roediger, Henry L., III
    Karpicke, Jeffrey D.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2013, 39 (06) : 1712 - 1725
  • [2] Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: The mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format
    Abel, Magdalena
    Roediger, Henry L., III
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2017, 45 (01) : 81 - 92
  • [3] Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: The mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format
    Magdalena Abel
    Henry L. Roediger
    Memory & Cognition, 2017, 45 : 81 - 92
  • [4] Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborative encoding
    Karpicke, Jeffrey D.
    Smith, Megan A.
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2012, 67 (01) : 17 - 29
  • [5] Retrieval Practice Benefits Deductive Inference
    Eglington, Luke G.
    Kang, Sean H. K.
    EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2018, 30 (01) : 215 - 228
  • [6] Confidence in accuracy moderates the benefits of retrieval practice
    Zhang, Mengting
    Chen, Xi
    Liu, Xiaonan L.
    MEMORY, 2019, 27 (04) : 548 - 554
  • [7] Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention
    Karpicke, Jeffrey D.
    Roediger, Henry L., III
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2007, 33 (04) : 704 - 719
  • [8] Benefits from retrieval practice are greater for students with lower working memory capacity
    Agarwal, Pooja K.
    Finley, Jason R.
    Rose, Nathan S.
    Roediger, Henry L., III
    MEMORY, 2017, 25 (06) : 764 - 771
  • [9] The Benefits of Retrieval Practice Depend on Item Difficulty and Intelligence
    Minear, Meredith
    Coane, Jennifer H.
    Boland, Sarah C.
    Cooney, Leah H.
    Albat, Marissa
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2018, 44 (09) : 1474 - 1486
  • [10] Retrieval practice benefits memory precision
    Schuetze, Brendan A.
    Eglington, Luke G.
    Kang, Sean H. K.
    MEMORY, 2019, 27 (08) : 1091 - 1098