Egg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range)

被引:103
作者
Dikmen, B. Yilmaz [1 ]
Ipek, A. [1 ]
Sahan, U. [1 ]
Petek, M. [2 ]
Sozcu, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Uludag Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Anim Sci, TR-16059 Bursa, Turkey
[2] Uludag Univ, Dept Zootech, Fac Vet Med, TR-16059 Bursa, Turkey
关键词
conventional cage; enriched cage; free range; egg production; welfare; BONE BREAKING STRENGTH; FOOT-PAD DERMATITIS; PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE; QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS; FURNISHED CAGES; BLOOD-PLASMA; GROUP-SIZE; STRAINS; PERCHES; TRAITS;
D O I
10.3382/ps/pew082
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare egg production performance and welfare traits of laying hens kept in conventional cage (CC), enriched cage (EC), and free range (FR). Lohmann Brown laying hens (n = 480 with 160 per housing type) were studied across a production cycle from placement at 17 wk until depopulation at 66 wk. The hens were randomly allocated into cages or pens of housing system groups; within each system there were four replicates with 40 hens in each pen or cage. The hen day egg production (P = 0.037), feed intake (FI) (P < 0.001), egg mass (EM) (P < 0.001), and dirty egg ratio of hens were higher in the FR system but similar in the CC and EC systems. The highest mortality ratio was found in EC system hens (P = 0.020). The best feather score was found in FR system hens (P < 0.001). The worse body wound score was found in EC system hens (P = 0.038). On the other hand, the worse bumble foot and footpad lesions were found in FR system hens (P < 0.001). The highest tibia breaking strength was found in FR system hens compared with in CC and EC system hens (P < 0.001). The highest Heterophil/Lymphocyte (H/L) ratio was found in CC system hens (P = 0.006) but the blood phosphorus (P) level was higher in FR system hens (P = 0.013). The tonic immobility, blood glucose, total cholesterol, triglyceride, and Ca values of hens were found to be similar in all systems (P > 0.05). The hens in the FR system had additional space for optimum comfort and better feather and bone traits, but the dirty egg ratio, feed consumption, and foot lesions were higher than in CC and EC systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1564 / 1572
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Effects of group size on performance health and birds' use of facilities in furnished cages for laying hens
    Abrahamsson, P
    Tauson, R
    [J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1997, 47 (04): : 254 - 260
  • [2] Comparison of Aviary, Barn and Conventional Cage Raising of Chickens on Laying Performance and Egg Quality
    Ahammed, M.
    Chae, B. J.
    Lohakare, J.
    Keohavong, B.
    Lee, M. H.
    Lee, S. J.
    Kim, D. M.
    Lee, J. Y.
    Ohh, S. J.
    [J]. ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2014, 27 (08): : 1196 - 1203
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1994, NUTRIENT REQUIREMENT
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. Current through revision 4
  • [5] The Edinburgh Modified Cage: Effects of group size and space allowance on brown laying hens
    Appleby, MC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH, 1998, 7 (02) : 152 - 161
  • [6] Anionic variation of diets on bone characteristics of broilers at 7 and 14 days of age
    Araujo, Gilson Mendes
    Vilar da Silva, Jose Humberto
    Vieites, Flavio Medeiros
    Kling de Moraes, George Henrique
    de Souza, Rafael Barbosa
    Barbosa, Anderson de Almeida
    Caramori Junior, Joao Garcia
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 41 (09): : 2124 - 2128
  • [7] The utilization of the Welfare Quality® assessment for determining laying hen condition across three housing systems
    Blatchford, R. A.
    Fulton, R. M.
    Mench, J. A.
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2016, 95 (01) : 154 - 163
  • [8] Clark P., 2009, ATLAS CLIN AVIAN HEM, P200
  • [9] BONE STRENGTH AS A TRAIT FOR ASSESSING MINERALIZATION IN SWINE - A CRITICAL-REVIEW OF TECHNIQUES INVOLVED
    CRENSHAW, TD
    PEO, ER
    LEWIS, AJ
    MOSER, BD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1981, 53 (03) : 827 - 835