Prostate Cancer Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Does the Choice of Diffusion-Weighting Level Matter?

被引:15
|
作者
Maier, Stephan E. [1 ,2 ]
Wallstrom, Jonas [1 ,3 ]
Langkilde, Fredrik [1 ,3 ]
Johansson, Jens [1 ]
Kuczera, Stefan [1 ]
Hugosson, Jonas [4 ,5 ]
Hellstrom, Mikael [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Radiol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Harvard Med Sch, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
diffusion; b-value; apparent diffusion coefficient; apparent diffusion coefficient ratio; kurtosis; prostate peripheral zone; GLEASON SCORE; PERIPHERAL ZONE; B-VALUE; MATHEMATICAL-MODELS; COEFFICIENT VALUES; WATER DIFFUSION; MRI; TUMOR; RATIO; TIME;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.27895
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging plays an important role in multiparametric assessment of prostate lesions. The derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) could be a useful quantitative biomarker for malignant growth, but lacks acceptance because of low reproducibility. Purpose To investigate the impact of the choice of diffusion-weighting levels (b-values) on contrast-to-noise ratio and quantitative measures in prostate diffusion-weighted MRI. Study Type Retrospective and simulation based on published data. Subjects Patient cohort (21 men with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 score >= 3) from a single-center study. Field Strength/Sequence 3 T/diffusion-weighted imaging with single-shot echo-planar imaging. Assessment Both clinical data and simulations based on previously acquired data were used to quantify the influence of b-value choice in normal peripheral zone (PZ) and PZ tumor lesions. For clinical data, ADC was determined for different combinations of b-values. Contrast-to-noise ratio and quantitative diffusion measures were simulated for a wide range of b-values. Statistical Tests Tissue ADC and the lesion-to-normal tissue ADC ratios of different b-value combinations were compared with paired two-tailed Student's t-tests. A P-value Findings about b-value dependence derived from clinical data and from simulations agreed with each other. Provided measurement was limited to two b-values, simulation-derived optimal b-value choices coincided with PI-RADSv2 recommendations. For two-point measurements, ADC decreased by 15% when the maximum b-value increased from 1000 to 1500 seconds/mm(2), but corresponding lesion-to-normal tissue ADC ratio showed no significant change (P = 0.86 for acquired data). Simulations with three or more measurement points produced ADCs that declined by only 8% over this range of maximum b-value. Corresponding ADC ratios declined between 2.6% (three points) and 3.8% (21 points). Simulations also revealed an ADC reduction of about 19% with the shorter echo and diffusion time evaluated. Data Conclusion The comprehensive assessment of b-value dependence permits better formulation of protocol and analysis recommendations for obtaining reproducible results in prostate cancer diffusion-weighted MRI. Level of Evidence 4 Technical Efficacy Stage 2
引用
收藏
页码:842 / 853
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Coronal Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Kidney: Agreement with Axial Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Imaging in Terms of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values
    Wang Hai-Yi
    Wang Jia
    Tang Ye-Huan
    Ye Hui-Yi
    Ma Lin
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2015, 128 (04) : 499 - 503
  • [42] Correlation of Clinical Risk Factors with Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Images in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive Radiotherapy
    Erbay, Gurcan
    Onal, Cem
    Guler, Ozan C.
    Karadeli, Elif
    Koc, Zafer
    UHOD-ULUSLARARASI HEMATOLOJI-ONKOLOJI DERGISI, 2015, 25 (02): : 88 - 97
  • [43] Magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging: extraneurological applications
    Colagrande, S
    Carbone, SF
    Carusi, LM
    Cova, M
    Villari, N
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2006, 111 (03): : 392 - 419
  • [44] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of pancreas tumours
    Kartalis, Nikolaos
    Lindholm, Terri L.
    Aspelin, Peter
    Permert, Johan
    Albiin, Nils
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (08) : 1981 - 1990
  • [45] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the temporal bone
    De Foer, B.
    Vercruysse, J-P.
    Spaepen, M.
    Somers, T.
    Pouillon, M.
    Offeciers, E.
    Casselman, J. W.
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2010, 52 (09) : 785 - 807
  • [46] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the management of cholesteatoma
    Jindal, Mudit
    Doshi, Jayesh
    Srivastav, Manoj
    Wilcock, David
    Irving, Richard
    De, Ranit
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 267 (02) : 181 - 185
  • [47] Efficacy of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and staging of endometrial tumors
    Kececi, I. S.
    Nural, M. S.
    Aslan, K.
    Danaci, M.
    Kefeli, M.
    Tosun, M.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2016, 97 (02) : 177 - 186
  • [48] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and pediatric epilepsy
    Malfait, Domitille
    Tucholka, Alan
    Lippe, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC EPILEPSY, 2013, 2 (01) : 49 - 61
  • [49] Quantitative Evaluation of Computed High b Value Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate
    Maas, Marnix C.
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Scheenen, Tom W. J.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (11) : 779 - 786
  • [50] Use of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Gastric Cancer Staging
    Soydan, Levent
    Demir, Ali Aslan
    Torun, Mehmet
    Cikrikcioglu, Makbule Arar
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 16 (10) : 1278 - 1289