Prostate Cancer Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Does the Choice of Diffusion-Weighting Level Matter?

被引:15
|
作者
Maier, Stephan E. [1 ,2 ]
Wallstrom, Jonas [1 ,3 ]
Langkilde, Fredrik [1 ,3 ]
Johansson, Jens [1 ]
Kuczera, Stefan [1 ]
Hugosson, Jonas [4 ,5 ]
Hellstrom, Mikael [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Radiol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Harvard Med Sch, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
diffusion; b-value; apparent diffusion coefficient; apparent diffusion coefficient ratio; kurtosis; prostate peripheral zone; GLEASON SCORE; PERIPHERAL ZONE; B-VALUE; MATHEMATICAL-MODELS; COEFFICIENT VALUES; WATER DIFFUSION; MRI; TUMOR; RATIO; TIME;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.27895
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging plays an important role in multiparametric assessment of prostate lesions. The derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) could be a useful quantitative biomarker for malignant growth, but lacks acceptance because of low reproducibility. Purpose To investigate the impact of the choice of diffusion-weighting levels (b-values) on contrast-to-noise ratio and quantitative measures in prostate diffusion-weighted MRI. Study Type Retrospective and simulation based on published data. Subjects Patient cohort (21 men with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 score >= 3) from a single-center study. Field Strength/Sequence 3 T/diffusion-weighted imaging with single-shot echo-planar imaging. Assessment Both clinical data and simulations based on previously acquired data were used to quantify the influence of b-value choice in normal peripheral zone (PZ) and PZ tumor lesions. For clinical data, ADC was determined for different combinations of b-values. Contrast-to-noise ratio and quantitative diffusion measures were simulated for a wide range of b-values. Statistical Tests Tissue ADC and the lesion-to-normal tissue ADC ratios of different b-value combinations were compared with paired two-tailed Student's t-tests. A P-value Findings about b-value dependence derived from clinical data and from simulations agreed with each other. Provided measurement was limited to two b-values, simulation-derived optimal b-value choices coincided with PI-RADSv2 recommendations. For two-point measurements, ADC decreased by 15% when the maximum b-value increased from 1000 to 1500 seconds/mm(2), but corresponding lesion-to-normal tissue ADC ratio showed no significant change (P = 0.86 for acquired data). Simulations with three or more measurement points produced ADCs that declined by only 8% over this range of maximum b-value. Corresponding ADC ratios declined between 2.6% (three points) and 3.8% (21 points). Simulations also revealed an ADC reduction of about 19% with the shorter echo and diffusion time evaluated. Data Conclusion The comprehensive assessment of b-value dependence permits better formulation of protocol and analysis recommendations for obtaining reproducible results in prostate cancer diffusion-weighted MRI. Level of Evidence 4 Technical Efficacy Stage 2
引用
收藏
页码:842 / 853
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Coronal Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Kidney: Agreement with Axial Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Imaging in Terms of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values
    Wang, Hai-Yi
    Wang, Jia
    Tang, Ye-Huan
    Ye, Hui-Yi
    Ma, Lin
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 128 (04) : 499 - 503
  • [22] Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in prostate diseases characterization on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Salvaggio, Giuseppe
    Calamia, Mauro
    Purpura, Pierpaolo
    Bartolotta, Tommaso V.
    Picone, Dario
    Dispensa, Nino
    Lunetta, Claudio
    Bruno, Alberto
    Raso, Ludovica
    Salvaggio, Leonardo
    Lo Re, Giuseppe
    Galia, Massimo
    Simonato, Alchiede
    Midiri, Massimo
    Lagalla, Roberto
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2019, 71 (02) : 154 - 160
  • [23] Diffusion-weighted imaging in pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging
    Govind B. Chavhan
    Pablo Caro-Dominguez
    Pediatric Radiology, 2016, 46 : 847 - 857
  • [24] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Uterine Cervical Cancer
    Liu, Ying
    Bai, Renju
    Sun, Haoran
    Liu, Haidong
    Wang, Dehua
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2009, 33 (06) : 858 - 862
  • [25] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ovarian Cancer: Exploiting Strengths and Understanding Limitations
    Gagliardi, Tanja
    Adejolu, Margaret
    DeSouza, Nandita M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (06)
  • [26] Computed diffusion-weighted imaging using 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis
    Yoshida, Rika
    Yoshizako, Takeshi
    Katsube, Takashi
    Tamaki, Yukihisa
    Ishikawa, Noriyoshi
    Kitagaki, Hajime
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2017, 41 : 78 - 82
  • [27] Value of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of cancer prostate
    Afifi, Ahmad Hafez Ahmad Alsayed
    Etaby, Ashraf Naguib
    Ahmad, Mohamad Alsayed Yousef
    Farghaly, Yasmin Tarek
    ALEXANDRIA JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 49 (01) : 57 - 66
  • [28] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen
    Schmid-Tannwald, C.
    Reiser, M. F.
    Zech, C. J.
    RADIOLOGE, 2011, 51 (03): : 195 - 204
  • [29] Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
    Brandao, Alice C.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    Partridge, Savannah C.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 21 (02) : 321 - +
  • [30] Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Cui, Xing-Yu
    Chen, Hong-Wei
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 16 (25) : 3196 - 3201