Prostate Cancer Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Does the Choice of Diffusion-Weighting Level Matter?

被引:15
|
作者
Maier, Stephan E. [1 ,2 ]
Wallstrom, Jonas [1 ,3 ]
Langkilde, Fredrik [1 ,3 ]
Johansson, Jens [1 ]
Kuczera, Stefan [1 ]
Hugosson, Jonas [4 ,5 ]
Hellstrom, Mikael [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Radiol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Harvard Med Sch, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
diffusion; b-value; apparent diffusion coefficient; apparent diffusion coefficient ratio; kurtosis; prostate peripheral zone; GLEASON SCORE; PERIPHERAL ZONE; B-VALUE; MATHEMATICAL-MODELS; COEFFICIENT VALUES; WATER DIFFUSION; MRI; TUMOR; RATIO; TIME;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.27895
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging plays an important role in multiparametric assessment of prostate lesions. The derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) could be a useful quantitative biomarker for malignant growth, but lacks acceptance because of low reproducibility. Purpose To investigate the impact of the choice of diffusion-weighting levels (b-values) on contrast-to-noise ratio and quantitative measures in prostate diffusion-weighted MRI. Study Type Retrospective and simulation based on published data. Subjects Patient cohort (21 men with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 score >= 3) from a single-center study. Field Strength/Sequence 3 T/diffusion-weighted imaging with single-shot echo-planar imaging. Assessment Both clinical data and simulations based on previously acquired data were used to quantify the influence of b-value choice in normal peripheral zone (PZ) and PZ tumor lesions. For clinical data, ADC was determined for different combinations of b-values. Contrast-to-noise ratio and quantitative diffusion measures were simulated for a wide range of b-values. Statistical Tests Tissue ADC and the lesion-to-normal tissue ADC ratios of different b-value combinations were compared with paired two-tailed Student's t-tests. A P-value Findings about b-value dependence derived from clinical data and from simulations agreed with each other. Provided measurement was limited to two b-values, simulation-derived optimal b-value choices coincided with PI-RADSv2 recommendations. For two-point measurements, ADC decreased by 15% when the maximum b-value increased from 1000 to 1500 seconds/mm(2), but corresponding lesion-to-normal tissue ADC ratio showed no significant change (P = 0.86 for acquired data). Simulations with three or more measurement points produced ADCs that declined by only 8% over this range of maximum b-value. Corresponding ADC ratios declined between 2.6% (three points) and 3.8% (21 points). Simulations also revealed an ADC reduction of about 19% with the shorter echo and diffusion time evaluated. Data Conclusion The comprehensive assessment of b-value dependence permits better formulation of protocol and analysis recommendations for obtaining reproducible results in prostate cancer diffusion-weighted MRI. Level of Evidence 4 Technical Efficacy Stage 2
引用
收藏
页码:842 / 853
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy
    Iannelli, Giancarlo
    Caivano, Rocchina
    Rago, Luciana
    Simeon, Vittorio
    Lotumolo, Antonella
    Rabasco, Paola
    Villonio, Antonio
    Gioioso, Matilde
    Mastrangelo, Pietro
    Barchetti, Flavio
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Macarini, Luca
    Guglielmi, Giuseppe
    Cammarota, Aldo
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2016, 102 (01): : 71 - 76
  • [2] Usefulness of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Wu, Lian-Ming
    Xu, Jian-Rong
    Gu, Hai-Yan
    Hua, Jia
    Chen, Jie
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhu, Jiong
    Ye, Yong-Quan
    Hu, Jiani
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2012, 19 (10) : 1215 - 1224
  • [3] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Comparison With Sextant Biopsy
    Yamamura, Jin
    Salomon, Georg
    Buchert, Ralph
    Hohenstein, Arne
    Graessner, Joachim
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Adam, Gerhard
    Wedegaertner, Ulrike
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2011, 35 (02) : 223 - 228
  • [4] Clinical utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer
    Afaq, Asim
    Koh, Dow-Mu
    Padhani, Anwar
    van As, Nicholas
    Sohaib, S. Aslam
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (11) : 1716 - 1722
  • [5] Meta-analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Prostate Cancer
    Jin, Guanqiao
    Su, Dan Ke
    Luo, Ning Bin
    Liu, Li Dong
    Zhu, Xuna
    Huang, Xiang Yang
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2013, 37 (02) : 195 - 202
  • [6] Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer evaluation
    Rinaldi, D.
    Fiocchi, F.
    Ligabue, G.
    Bianchi, G.
    Torricelli, P.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2012, 117 (08): : 1429 - 1440
  • [7] Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient value on diffusion-weighted MR imaging and Gleason score in prostate cancer
    Wu, X.
    Reinikainen, P.
    Vanhanen, A.
    Kapanen, M.
    Vierikko, T.
    Ryymin, P.
    Hyodynmaa, S.
    Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P. -L.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2017, 98 (01) : 63 - 71
  • [8] Diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer
    Tamada, Tsutomu
    Ueda, Yu
    Ueno, Yoshiko
    Kojima, Yuichi
    Kido, Ayumu
    Yamamoto, Akira
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (04) : 533 - 547
  • [9] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Head and Neck
    Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2010, 34 (06) : 808 - 815
  • [10] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detects Significant Prostate Cancer with High Probability
    Bains, Lauren J.
    Studer, Urs E.
    Froehlich, Johannes M.
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Triantafyllou, Maria
    Fleischmann, Achim
    Thoenyt, Harriet C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (03): : 737 - 742