The effects of propofol-midazolam-ketamine co-induction on hemodynamic changes and catecholamine response

被引:12
|
作者
Abbasivash, Rahman [1 ]
Aghdashi, Mir Moosa [1 ]
Sinaei, Behzad [1 ]
Kheradmand, Fatemeh [2 ]
机构
[1] Urmia Univ Med Sci, Imam Khomeini Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Orumiyeh, Iran
[2] Urmia Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Dept Biochem, Ctr Cellular & Mol Res, Orumiyeh, Iran
关键词
Etomidate hemodynamics; Ketamine hemodynamics; Midazolam; Propofol; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; PROCEDURAL SEDATION; KETOFOL; INTUBATION; PARAMETERS; ANESTHESIA; ANALGESIA; INSERTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.05.014
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of co-induction with propofol-midazolam-ketamine with etomidate as the sole induction agent. Design: Prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Setting: Operating room of a university hospital. Patients: 60 ASA physical status 1 and 2 patients scheduled for limited elective surgery requiring general anesthesia. Interventions: Patients were randomized to two groups to receive etomidate 0.3 mg/kg (single-drug group) or propofol 0.6 mg/kg + ketamine 0.8 mg/kg + midazolam 0.06 mg/kg (three-drug group). Measurements: Hemodynamic responses (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure) were examined at baseline and at one, three, and 5 minutes after tracheal intubation. Plasma catecholamine levels were measured at baseline, one, and 5 minutes after tracheal intubation. Main Results: Heart rate (HR) changes differed significantly between the two groups at three minutes (P = 0.01) and 5 minutes (P = 0.00) after tracheal intubation. However, the HR increase in the three-drug group was in the acceptable range. Percentage changes of epinephrine level differed between the two groups at 5 minutes after tracheal intubation (P = 0.03). Conclusions: The higher norepinephrine/epinephrine ratio noted in the single-drug group may be implicated in lower adrenal sympathetic activity. Propofol-midazolam-ketamine co-induction may be used instead of etomidate for anesthesia induction in patients with hemodynamic instability. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:628 / 633
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SMALL DOSE PROPOFOL OR KETAMINE AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO MIDAZOLAM CO-INDUCTION TO PROPOFOL
    Srivastava, Uma
    Sharma, Neeraj
    Kumar, Aditya
    Saxena, Surekha
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 50 (02) : 112 - 114
  • [2] CO-INDUCTION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MIDAZOLAM KETAMINE AND PROPOFOL AS COINDUCING AGENTS TO PROPOFOL
    Mallikarjuna, Jyothi
    Purneema, K.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (61): : 10666 - 10680
  • [3] A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SMALL DOSE KETAMINE, MIDAZOLAM AND PROPOFOL AS CO-INDUCTION AGENT TO PROPOFOL
    Nema, Neelesh
    Arora, K. K.
    Rana, Abhimanyu
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2014, 3 (47): : 11349 - 11357
  • [4] THE CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS OF MIDAZOLAM CO-INDUCTION TO PROPOFOL FOR INDUCTION IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS
    Kabir, Kaushal
    Arya, Sunil
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2014, 3 (56): : 12737 - 12745
  • [5] The cardiovascular effects of midazolam co-induction to propofol for induction in aged patients
    Lim, Young Soo
    Kang, Dong Hee
    Kim, Se Hwan
    Jang, Tae Ho
    Kim, Kyung Han
    Ryu, Sie Jeong
    Yu, Soo Bong
    Kim, Doo Sik
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 62 (06) : 536 - 542
  • [6] Efficacy of ketamine and midazolam as co-induction agents with propofol for laryngeal mask insertion in children
    Goel, Shiba
    Bhardwaj, Neerja
    Jain, Kajal
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2008, 18 (07) : 628 - 634
  • [7] A comparison of midazolam co-induction with propofol predosing for induction of anaesthesia
    Anderson, L
    Robb, H
    ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 53 (11) : 1117 - 1120
  • [8] Effects of altering the sequence of midazolam and propofol during co-induction of anaesthesia
    Sanchez, Andrea
    Belda, Eliseo
    Escobar, Mayte
    Agut, Amalia
    Soler, Marta
    Laredo, Francisco G.
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2013, 40 (04) : 359 - 366
  • [9] Comparison between effects of ketamine and midazolam as co-induction agents with propofol for proseal (TM) laryngeal mask insertion
    Mohamad, R. Latif
    Tang, S. S. P.
    Yahya, N.
    Izaham, A.
    Yusof, A. Mohamad
    Manap, N. Abdul
    SRI LANKAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 24 (01): : 16 - 21
  • [10] Fentanyl or midazolam for co-induction of anaesthesia with propofol in dogs
    Covey-Crump, Gwen L.
    Murison, Pamela J.
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 35 (06) : 463 - 472