Forecasting Ionospheric foF2 Based on Deep Learning Method

被引:22
作者
Li, Xiaojun [1 ]
Zhou, Chen [1 ]
Tang, Qiong [2 ]
Zhao, Jun [3 ]
Zhang, Fubin [1 ]
Xia, Guozhen [1 ]
Liu, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Elect Informat, Dept Space Phys, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol, Inst Space Sci & Appl Technol, Shenzhen 518000, Peoples R China
[3] Res Inst Radiowave Propagat, Qingdao 266107, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ionospheric foF2; neural network; long short-term memory; forecasting model; deep learning; NEURAL-NETWORKS; MODEL; TEC; PARAMETERS; F(O)F(2); NUMBER; WIND; GPS;
D O I
10.3390/rs13193849
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this paper, a deep learning long-short-term memory (LSTM) method is applied to the forecasting of the critical frequency of the ionosphere F2 layer (foF2). Hourly values of foF2 from 10 ionospheric stations in China and Australia (based on availability) from 2006 to 2019 are used for training and verifying. While 2015 and 2019 are exclusive for verifying the forecasting accuracy. The inputs of the LSTM model are sequential data for the previous values, which include local time (LT), day number, solar zenith angle, the sunspot number (SSN), the daily F10.7 solar flux, geomagnetic the Ap and Kp indices, geographic coordinates, neutral winds, and the observed value of foF2 at the previous moment. To evaluate the forecasting ability of the deep learning LSTM model, two different neural network forecasting models: a back-propagation neural network (BPNN) and a genetic algorithm optimized backpropagation neural network (GABP) were established for comparative analysis. The foF2 parameters were forecasted under geomagnetic quiet and geomagnetic disturbed conditions during solar activity maximum (2015) and minimum (2019), respectively. The forecasting results of these models are compared with those of the international reference ionosphere model (IRI2016) and the measurements. The diurnal and seasonal variations of foF2 for the 4 models were compared and analyzed from 8 selected verification stations. The forecasting results reveal that the deep learning LSTM model presents the optimal performance of all models in forecasting the time series of foF2, while the IRI2016 model has the poorest forecasting performance, and the BPNN model and GABP model are between two of them.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] The 22-year cycle in the geomagnetic 27-day recurrences reflecting on the F2-layer ionization
    Apostolov, EM
    Altadill, D
    Todorova, M
    [J]. ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2004, 22 (04) : 1171 - 1176
  • [2] Atulkar R., 2014, AM J ASTRON ASTROPHY, V2, P61, DOI 10.11648/j.ajaa.20140206.11
  • [3] International Reference Ionosphere 2007: Improvements and new parameters
    Bilitza, D.
    Reinisch, B. W.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2008, 42 (04) : 599 - 609
  • [4] International Reference Ionosphere 2016: From ionospheric climate to real-time weather predictions
    Bilitza, D.
    Altadill, D.
    Truhlik, V.
    Shubin, V.
    Galkin, I.
    Reinisch, B.
    Huang, X.
    [J]. SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2017, 15 (02): : 418 - 429
  • [5] Blaunstein N., 2008, IONOSPHERE APPL ASPE, DOI [10.1201/9781420055177, DOI 10.1201/9781420055177]
  • [6] Spatial correlation of foF2 and vTEC under quiet and disturbed ionospheric conditions: A case study
    Cander, Ljiljana R.
    [J]. ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2007, 55 (03) : 410 - 423
  • [7] Ionospheric forecasting technique by artificial neural network
    Cander, LR
    Milosavljevic, MM
    Stankovic, SS
    Tomasevic, S
    [J]. ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 1998, 34 (16) : 1573 - 1574
  • [8] Chen DJ, 2007, CHINESE J GEOPHYS-CH, V50, P18
  • [9] Cherrier N., 2017, P BIG DAT SPAC BIDS
  • [10] An optimizing BP neural network algorithm based on genetic algorithm
    Ding, Shifei
    Su, Chunyang
    Yu, Junzhao
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2011, 36 (02) : 153 - 162