Patients' views on their decision making during inpatient rehabilitation after newly acquired spinal cord injuryA qualitative interview-based study

被引:32
作者
Scheel-Sailer, Anke [1 ]
Post, Marcel W. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Michel, Franz [1 ]
Weidmann-Hugle, Tatjana [6 ,7 ]
Holzle, Ruth Baumann [6 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Parapleg Ctr, Nottwil, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Parapleg Res, Nottwil, Switzerland
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Rehabil Med, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Ctr Excellence Rehabil Med, Brain Ctr Rudolf Magnus, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] De Hoogstraat Rehabil, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Inst Dialog Eth, Zurich, Switzerland
[7] Univ Zurich, Inst Biomed Eth & Hist Med, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
clinical ethics; health communication; legal obligation; personal autonomy; shared decision-making; subacute care; CENTERED CARE; EDUCATION; AUTONOMY; HEALTH; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; SCIREHAB;
D O I
10.1111/hex.12559
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionInvolving patients in decision making is a legal requirement in many countries, associated with better rehabilitation outcomes, but not easily accomplished during initial inpatient rehabilitation after severe trauma. Providing medical treatment according to the principles of shared decision making is challenging as a point in case for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to retrospectively explore the patients' views on their participation in decision making during their first inpatient rehabilitation after onset of SCI, in order to optimize treatment concepts. MethodsA total of 22 participants with SCI were interviewed in-depth using a semi-structured interview scheme between 6months and 35years post-onset. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed with the Mayring method for qualitative content analysis. ResultsParticipants experienced a substantially reduced ability to participate in decision making during the early phase after SCI. They perceived physical, psychological and environmental factors to have impacted upon this ability. Patients mentioned regaining their ability to make decisions was an important goal during their first rehabilitation. Receiving adequate information in an understandable and personalized way was a prerequisite to achieve this goal. Other important factors included medical and psychological condition, personal engagement, time and dialogue with peers. ConclusionDuring the initial rehabilitation of patients with SCI, professionals need to deal with the discrepancy between the obligation to respect a patient's autonomy and their diminished ability for decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1142
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [11] Evidence-based health information from the users' perspective - a qualitative analysis
    Hirschberg, Irene
    Seidel, Gabriele
    Strech, Daniel
    Bastian, Hilda
    Dierks, Marie-Luise
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
  • [12] Knowledge is not power for patients: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making
    Joseph-Williams, Natalie
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Edwards, Adrian
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2014, 94 (03) : 291 - 309
  • [13] Patient centered goal-setting in a subacute rehabilitation setting
    Leach, Emma
    Cornwell, Petrea
    Fleming, Jenny
    Haines, Terrence
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 32 (02) : 159 - 172
  • [14] Lesky J, 2002, Rehabilitation (Stuttg), V41, P329
  • [15] Concept analysis: patient autonomy in a caring context
    Lindberg, Catharina
    Fagerstrom, Cecilia
    Sivberg, Bengt
    Willman, Ania
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2014, 70 (10) : 2208 - 2221
  • [16] Locatelli Sara M, 2016, Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, V22, P192, DOI 10.1310/sci2016-00027
  • [17] Mayring P., 2011, Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken
  • [18] Nussbaum M.C, 2001, WOMEN HUMAN DEV CAPA, V3
  • [19] The four principles: Can they be measured and do they predict ethical decision making?
    Page, Katie
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2012, 13
  • [20] Pally U., 2014, SCHWEIZERISCHE ARZ 2, V11, P427