What drives fluctuations of labor wedge and business cycles? Evidence from Japan

被引:1
作者
Inaba, Masaru [1 ,2 ]
Nutahara, Kengo [2 ,3 ]
Shirai, Daichi [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kansai Univ, 3-3-35 Yamate Cho, Suita, Osaka 5648680, Japan
[2] Canon Inst Global Studies, Chiyoda Ku, 1-5-1 Marunouchi, Tokyo 1006511, Japan
[3] Senshu Univ, Tama Ku, 2-1-1 Higashimita, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2148580, Japan
[4] Tohoku Gakuin Univ, Aoba Ku, 1-3-1 Tsuchitoi, Sendai, Miyagi 9808511, Japan
关键词
Labor wedge; DSGE model; Structural shocks; Measurement error; Prior distribution; INVESTMENT; POLICY; 1990S; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmacro.2022.103402
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The literature has empirically shown that the labor wedge worsens during recessions. Taking this statement into consideration, this study poses two questions: First, what is the main driving force of the labor wedge, and second, is the main driver of the labor wedge the same as that of business cycles? In this study, we employ a commonly used medium-scale dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with nominal and real frictions to analyze which structural shocks drive the fluctuation of the labor wedge and of business cycles. The model is estimated using Japanese data. Our estimation strategy is a particularly novel approach. In standard Bayesian estimation, the prior distribution of the parameters for the standard deviations of the structural shocks is the inverse gamma distribution, which does not support zero value and assumes the existence of structural shocks. By contrast, we employ a more flexible prior distribution of the parameters for the standard deviations of structural shocks and measurement errors to allow for the non-existence of structural shocks. Under the standard prior distribution, the estimation results imply that the labor wedge is mainly driven by preference and transitory technology shocks, whereas the investment adjustment cost shock is the most important for the business cycle fluctuations. However, under our relaxed prior distribution, which allows for the nonexistence of structural shocks, the estimation results imply that both the labor wedge and business cycles are mainly driven by permanent technology and investment adjustment cost shocks.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   Is there a Trade-Off between Inflation and Output Stabilization? [J].
Justiniano, Alejandro ;
Primiceri, Giorgio E. ;
Tambalotti, Andrea .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MACROECONOMICS, 2013, 5 (02) :1-31
[22]   Investment shocks and the relative price of investment [J].
Justiniano, Alejandro ;
Primiceri, Giorgio E. ;
Tambalotti, Andrea .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2011, 14 (01) :102-121
[23]   Investment shocks and business cycles [J].
Justiniano, Alejandro ;
Primiceri, Giorgio E. ;
Tambalotti, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2010, 57 (02) :132-145
[24]   What caused Japan's Great Stagnation in the 1990s? Evidence from an estimated DSGE model [J].
Kaihatsu, Sohei ;
Kurozumi, Takushi .
JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE AND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIES, 2014, 34 :217-235
[25]   Sources of business fluctuations: Financial or technology shocks? [J].
Kaihatsu, Sohei ;
Kurozumi, Takushi .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2014, 17 (02) :224-242
[26]   Home production, labor wedges, and international business cycles [J].
Karabarbounis, Loukas .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2014, 64 :68-84
[27]   The labor wedge: MRS vs. MPN [J].
Karabarbounis, Loukas .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2014, 17 (02) :206-223
[28]  
King RG, 1999, HBK ECON, V15, P927
[29]   Business cycle accounting for the Japanese economy [J].
Kobayashi, Keiichiro ;
Inaba, Masaru .
JAPAN AND THE WORLD ECONOMY, 2006, 18 (04) :418-440
[30]   The Economic Crisis from a Neoclassical Perspective [J].
Ohanian, Lee E. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 24 (04) :45-66