Recruitment order of motor neurons promoted by epidural stimulation in individuals with spinal cord injury

被引:13
|
作者
Ibanez, Jaime [1 ,2 ]
Angeli, Claudia A. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Harkema, Susan J. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Farina, Dario [1 ]
Rejc, Enrico [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Bioengn, London, England
[2] UCL, Inst Neurol, Dept Clin & Movement Neurosci, London, England
[3] Univ Louisville, Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Res Ctr, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[4] Univ Louisville, Dept Bioengn, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[5] Univ Louisville Hlth, Frazier Rehabil Inst, Louisville, KY USA
[6] Univ Louisville, Dept Neurol Surg, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
epidural stimulation; motor neuron; spinal cord injury; standing; recruitment order; NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; FIBER CONDUCTION-VELOCITY; LUMBAR CORD; POSTERIOR STRUCTURES; UNIT RECRUITMENT; SKELETAL-MUSCLE; NEUROMODULATION; SIZE; EXCITABILITY; ADAPTATIONS;
D O I
10.1152/japplphysiol.00293.2021
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) combined with activity-based training can promote motor function recovery in individuals with motor complete spinal cord injury (SCI). The characteristics of motor neuron recruitment, which influence different aspects of motor control, are still unknown when motor function is promoted by scES. Here, we enrolled five individuals with chronic motor complete SCI implanted with an scES unit to study the recruitment order of motor neurons during standing enabled by scES. We recorded high-density electromyography (HD-EMG) signals on the vastus lateralis muscle and inferred the order of recruitment of motor neurons from the relation between amplitude and conduction velocity of the scES-evoked EMG responses along the muscle fibers. Conduction velocity of scES-evoked responses was modulated over time, whereas stimulation parameters and standing condition remained constant, with average values ranging between 3.0 +/- 0.1 and 4.4 +/- 0.3 m/s. We found that the human spinal circuitry receiving epidural stimulation can promote both orderly (according to motor neuron size) and inverse trends of motor neuron recruitment, and that the engagement of spinal networks promoting rhythmic activity may favor orderly recruitment trends. Conversely, the different recruitment trends did not appear to be related with time since injury or scES implant, nor to the ability to achieve independent knees extension, nor to the conduction velocity values. The proposed approach can be implemented to investigate the effects of stimulation parameters and training-induced neural plasticity on the characteristics of motor neuron recruitment order, contributing to improve mechanistic understanding and effectiveness of epidural stimulation-promoted motor recovery after SCI. NEW & NOTEWORTHY After motor complete spinal cord injury, the human spinal cord receiving epidural stimulation can promote both orderly and inverse trends of motor neuron recruitment. The engagement of spinal networks involved in the generation of rhythmic activity seems to favor orderly recruitment trends.
引用
收藏
页码:1100 / 1110
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spinal Cord Stimulation Prevents Autonomic Dysreflexia in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Series
    Samejima, Soshi
    Shackleton, Claire
    Malik, Raza N.
    Cao, Kawami
    Bohorquez, Anibal
    Nightingale, Tom E.
    Sachdeva, Rahul
    Krassioukov, Andrei V.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (08)
  • [32] CORTICAL AND VESTIBULAR STIMULATION REVEAL PRESERVED DESCENDING MOTOR PATHWAYS IN INDIVIDUALS WITH MOTOR-COMPLETE SPINAL CORD INJURY
    Squair, Jordan W.
    Bjerkefors, Anna
    Inglis, J. Timothy
    Lam, Tania
    Carpenter, Mark G.
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2016, 48 (07) : 589 - 596
  • [33] A flexible electrode array for determining regions of motor function activated by epidural spinal cord stimulation in rats with spinal cord injury
    Guang-Wei Mao
    Jian-Jun Zhang
    Hao Su
    Zhi-Jun Zhou
    Lin-Sen Zhu
    Xiao-Ying Lü
    Zhi-Gong Wang
    NeuralRegenerationResearch, 2022, 17 (03) : 601 - 607
  • [34] Epidural stimulation of the spinal cord in spinal cord injury: current status and future challenges
    Edgerton, Victor Reggie
    Harkema, Susan
    EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2011, 11 (10) : 1351 - 1353
  • [35] Review of Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation for Augmenting Cough after Spinal Cord Injury
    Hachmann, Jan T.
    Calvert, Jonathan S.
    Grahn, Peter J.
    Drubach, Dina I.
    Lee, Kendall H.
    Lavrov, Igor A.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 11
  • [36] Epidural spinal cord stimulation in the management of spasms in spinal cord injury: A prospective study
    Barolat, G
    SinghSahni, K
    Staas, WE
    Shatin, D
    Ketcik, B
    Allen, K
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 1995, 64 (03) : 153 - 164
  • [37] Selective Activation of the Spinal Cord with Epidural Electrical Stimulation
    Cuellar, Carlos
    Lehto, Lauri
    Islam, Riaz
    Mangia, Silvia
    Michaeli, Shalom
    Lavrov, Igor
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (07)
  • [38] Recruitment of upper-limb motoneurons with epidural electrical stimulation of the cervical spinal cord
    Greiner, Nathan
    Barra, Beatrice
    Schiavone, Giuseppe
    Lorach, Henri
    James, Nicholas
    Conti, Sara
    Kaeser, Melanie
    Fallegger, Florian
    Borgognon, Simon
    Lacour, Stephanie
    Bloch, Jocelyne
    Courtine, Gregoire
    Capogrosso, Marco
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [39] Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation Facilitates Immediate Restoration of Dormant Motor and Autonomic Supraspinal Pathways after Chronic Neurologically Complete Spinal Cord Injury
    Darrow, David
    Balser, David
    Netoff, Theoden I.
    Krassioukov, Andrei
    Phillips, Aaron
    Parr, Ann
    Samadani, Uzma
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2019, 36 (15) : 2325 - 2336
  • [40] Targeting Lumbar Spinal Neural Circuitry by Epidural Stimulation to Restore Motor Function After Spinal Cord Injury
    Karen Minassian
    W. Barry McKay
    Heinrich Binder
    Ursula S. Hofstoetter
    Neurotherapeutics, 2016, 13 : 284 - 294